Monday, March 28, 2011

Share Investor Portfolio: Value at 28 March 2011

The Share Investor Portfolio was up in the forth week of March. The portfolio was up by 1.02% or $2760.00 on the March 21 update . For the first 12 weeks of 2011 the portfolio has increased by 5.6% or $13978.77. This weeks rise was due, primarily, to a 15c rise in FRE, WHS rising slightly and a 34c rise in FBU, with a wide range of other smaller variations up and down across the portfolio.

$140.00 net was added from HLG from dividends after their 2011 HY profit result.

The total of unspent dividends and interest in the bank from the 2010 - 2011 earnings years is $ $23479.21 at close of reporting season for 2010 and partway through the 2011 year. There are also approx $50000.00 in tax credits earned from the portfolio since it began in late 2002.


Share Investor Portfolio as at 10:01:59, Monday 28 March, 2011 (NZDT)

Stock
Quantity
Cost price
Total cost
Market price
Market value
Change
%
AIA

2,000 $1.700 $3,400.00 $2.190 $4,380.00 $980.00 28.82%
AIA

2,000 $1.510 $3,020.00 $2.190 $4,380.00 $1,360.00 45.03%
AIA

558 $0.000 $0.00 $2.190 $1,222.02 $1,222.02
AIA

754 $2.150 $1,621.10 $2.190 $1,651.26 $30.16 1.86%
ASBPB

3,027 $0.000 $0.00 $0.675 $2,043.23 $2,043.23
ASBPB

6,973 $1.000 $6,973.00 $0.675 $4,706.78 $2,266.23 32.50%
BGR

619 $0.000 $0.00 $1.340 $829.46 $829.46
BGR

2,381 $0.990 $2,357.19 $1.340 $3,190.54 $833.35 35.35%
FBU

284 $0.000 $0.00 $9.040 $2,567.36 $2,567.36
FBU

830 $9.750 $8,092.50 $9.040 $7,503.20 $589.30 7.28%
FPH

3,000 $2.350 $7,050.00 $3.120 $9,360.00 $2,310.00 32.77%
FPH

541 $0.000 $0.00 $3.120 $1,687.92 $1,687.92
FPH

1,459 $3.720 $5,427.48 $3.120 $4,552.08 $875.40 16.13%
FRE

2,054 $0.000 $0.00 $3.200 $6,572.80 $6,572.80
FRE

6,577 $3.630 $23,874.51 $3.200 $21,046.40 $2,828.11 11.85%
GFF

586 $0.000 $0.00 $1.650 $966.90 $966.90
GFF

1,414 $2.330 $3,294.62 $1.650 $2,333.10 $961.52 29.18%
HLG

299 $0.000 $0.00 $3.800 $1,136.20 $1,136.20
HLG

701 $2.530 $1,773.53 $3.800 $2,663.80 $890.27 50.20%
KIP

190 $0.000 $0.00 $1.015 $192.85 $192.85
KIP

810 $1.480 $1,198.80 $1.015 $822.15 $376.65 31.42%
MFT

1,000 $7.960 $7,960.00 $8.740 $8,740.00 $780.00 9.80%
MFT

1,838 $8.000 $14,704.00 $8.740 $16,064.12 $1,360.12 9.25%
MFT

657 $0.000 $0.00 $8.740 $5,742.18 $5,742.18
MFT

1,505 $4.200 $6,321.00 $8.740 $13,153.70 $6,832.70 108.10%
MHI

1,646 $0.860 $1,415.56 $0.870 $1,432.02 $16.46 1.16%
MHI

7,000 $0.630 $4,410.00 $0.870 $6,090.00 $1,680.00 38.10%
MHI

494 $1.050 $518.70 $0.870 $429.78 $88.92 17.14%
MHI

860 $0.000 $0.00 $0.870 $748.20 $748.20
PPG

31 $0.000 $0.00 $0.280 $8.68 $8.68
PPG

1,500 $0.440 $660.00 $0.280 $420.00 $240.00 36.36%
PPG

1,004 $0.800 $803.20 $0.280 $281.12 $522.08 65.00%
PPL

1,000 $3.090 $3,090.00 $1.310 $1,310.00 $1,780.00 57.61%
PPL

1,000 $2.870 $2,870.00 $1.310 $1,310.00 $1,560.00 54.36%
PPL

939 $4.200 $3,943.80 $1.310 $1,230.09 $2,713.71 68.81%
PPL

975 $0.000 $0.00 $1.310 $1,277.25 $1,277.25
PPL

1,086 $1.530 $1,661.58 $1.310 $1,422.66 $238.92 14.38%
RYM

459 $0.000 $0.00 $2.370 $1,087.83 $1,087.83
RYM

4,586 $1.970 $9,034.42 $2.370 $10,868.82 $1,834.40 20.30%
SKC

5,750 $7.430 $42,722.50 $3.340 $19,205.00 $23,517.50 55.05%
SKC

1,000 $7.600 $7,600.00 $3.340 $3,340.00 $4,260.00 56.05%
SKC

2,750 $7.700 $21,175.00 $3.340 $9,185.00 $11,990.00 56.62%
SKC

1,431 $8.750 $12,521.25 $3.340 $4,779.54 $7,741.71 61.83%
SKC

272 $4.720 $1,283.84 $3.340 $908.48 $375.36 29.24%
SKC

25,712 $0.000 $0.00 $3.340 $85,878.08 $85,878.08
STU

78 $0.000 $0.00 $2.550 $198.90 $198.90
STU

303 $4.740 $1,436.22 $2.550 $772.65 $663.57 46.20%
WHS

4,500 $3.730 $16,785.00 $3.430 $15,435.00 $1,350.00 8.04%
WHS

6,979 $6.000 $41,874.00 $3.430 $23,937.97 $17,936.03 42.83%
WHS

15 $3.710 $55.65 $3.430 $51.45 $4.20 7.55%
WHS

3,506 $0.000 $0.00 $3.430 $12,025.58 $12,025.58


22.22%


Total cost Market value Change

$270,928.45 $331,142.14 $60,213.69



Share Investor Portfolio @ Share Investor

Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 14 March 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 8 March 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 28 February 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 21 February 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 14 February 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 7 February 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 31 January 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 24 January 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 17 January 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 10 January 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 3 January 2011
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 27 December 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 20 December 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 13 December 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 6 December 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 29 November 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 22 November 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 15 November 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 8 November 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 1 November 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 25 October 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 18 October 2010
Share Investor Portfolio: Value @ 11 October 2010
Share Investor Dividends


Share Investor's Annual Stock Picks

Share Investor's 2011 Stock Picks
Share Investor's 2010 Stock Picks
Share Investor's 2009 Stock Picks
Share Investor's 2008 stock picks

Brokers 2011 Stock Picks


Related Amazon Reading


The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition)
The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) by Benjamin Graham
Buy new: $14.95 / Used from: $9.73
Usually ships in 24 hours

Security Analysis: The Classic 1934 Edition
Security Analysis: The Classic 1934 Edition by GRAHAM
Buy new: $37.80 / Used from: $29.48
Usually ships in 24 hours

Buy these two Books @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond




c Share Investor 2011

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Darren Hughes Saga: A Question of Leadership


The issue over Darren Hughes and his sexual dalliances with young boys is more of a side issue if you can get over the image of a distressed, naked teenager running down the road away from Mr Hughes abode a few weeks ago.

What is at issue here as far as politics goes is Leadership and the failure of Phil Goff to be open and honest with first his own voters and then the New Zealand public at large.

Did he really think he could keep this quiet?

On that issue alone one would have to question his decision making on.

When you drill down further though there are also moral and honesty issues involved here.

What kind of leader tries to hide a sexual offense of a subordinate and then tries to deflect appropriate criticism brought on him by blaming the Government for "leaking the information to the media"?

Darren Hughes is also the chief whip of the Labour party, responsible for keeping Labour colleagues in line, how is he supposed to be the arbiter of good judgement if his leader allows him to trip the light fantastic all over the country with every teenage boy that takes his fancy?

Mr Goff has been aware of Darren's track record for hitting on teen boys as least as far back as Christmas 2009, where he hit on another boy at a Labour Party shindig so what on earth was Goff doing allowing Darren Hughes to continue in his role when there was so much evidence that Hughes was not fit for the job?

The answers he has given to defend his series of bad decisions just doesn't satisfy the public at large let alone Labour supporters.

Under pressure he has looked ineffectual, evasive, very uncomfortable and dishonest.

You have to ask yourself, is this a man you want leading your country post November 26?

Anyone for Gingernuts and a cup of tea?



Bookmark and Share

Friday, March 25, 2011

Class Action Suit Against Finance Company Trustees: How to Register

New Zealand law firm Turner Hopkins, in conjunction with Australian law firm Slater Gordon, while not promising to return investors funds in collapsed finance companies, is however going to pursue some sort of justice by taking a class action suit against trustees of these finance companies, trustees whose job it was to keep a watchful eye on the day to day business activities of the directors and CEOs of these disgraced finance companies.

The trustees in finance companies such as Hanover, Capital & Merchant, Bridgecorp, Nathans and the like were trusted to have investors interests at heart first and that meant any irregularities would have to be looked at and investigated if need be. The majority of these trustees failed to adequately acquit themselves of their positions and in the absence of justice from the directors and CEOS of finance companies the trustees are the ideal candidates to now apply some heat to.

The following detail from the Turner Hopkins website explains in detail who is eligible to register to become part of the class action against these failed trustees. There will be no funds to pay to register or be part of the suit. I have no idea how it will be funded but it will and I am assuming that the respective law firms will be taking their cut at the end of a successful prosecution and so they should as it is admirable what they are trying to achieve.

Please see below for the detail of the class action suit and how to register to become part of it.

These claims will be in the form of representative proceedings on behalf of large groups of investors in one or more of the failed finance companies. The claims are expected to allege a breach of trust on the part of the corporate trustees appointed to monitor and supervise the activities of the failed finance companies and protect investors. Investors may well be entitled to recover economic losses incurred by them as a result.

Slater & Gordon are Australasia’s largest law practice and have decades of experience in class action and representative claims of this nature. They bring invaluable experience and expertise to this type of litigation. In particular Slater & Gordon have recently commenced a claim on behalf of investors against trustees of a failed finance company in Queensland and achieved an outstanding result for the investors.

Turner Hopkins has been working alongside Slater & Gordon for the past 12 months in analysing these potential claims. Being a specialist boutique practice situated in Auckland, Turner Hopkins’ partnership with Slater & Gordon provides the ideal mix of specialisation and experience to perform for the best interests of investors in a claim of this nature.

In addition we have secured the services and assistance of a highly experienced and skilled team of experts including one of Auckland’s most senior and well regarded Queen’s Counsel and accounting and financial specialists.

Funded Litigation

It is anticipated that the costs of bringing these claims will be met through litigation funding. This would mean that investors would not be required to make any payment at all for bringing this case. Nor would investors be exposed to any risk of adverse costs or other awards against them should the claim be unsuccessful. Funding arrangements of this type are relatively novel in New Zealand. We expect details of the funding arrangement to be available shortly.

Registration

We are currently seeking expressions of interest from investors who have sustained losses following the collapse of any of the New Zealand finance companies during the period between 2006 to 2009. If you were an investor and have lost money in one of those companies (regardless of whether it is now in liquidation, receivership or moratorium) we would be very pleased to receive your registration.

Registration will entitle you to receive directly from us regular updates on progress towards commencing these claims as well as information specifically relevant to the finance company/corporate trustee claim that may be available in your particular circumstances. We will also provide updates as to arrangements being made as to litigation funding arrangements that are being made. We look forward to hearing from you.

Register Now - Click Here


Related Share Investor Reading

List of Trustees & Finance Companies they managed


Mark Hotchin Comes Out Swinging
Hanover's "White Knights" are really daylight robbers
Hanover collapse: It was just a matter of time
Money Managers Saga: 3 Story wrap
Money Managers gives First Step investors the middle finger
Greed is bad: Geneva Finance Folds
Financial 101: Learn before you leap
Kevin's Blog


Recommended Fishpond Reading

Crisis: One Central Bank Governor and the Global Financial Collapse

Buy The Intelligent Investor & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


c Share Investor 2011

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Queenstown Airport: Queenstown Airport Update

If you have been following the issues closely surrounding Auckland International Airport Ltd [AIA.NZX] and their purchase of a 24.99% stake in Queenstown Airport you will probably already know that a couple of significant pieces of news have been released on this matter over the last week or so.

Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC), through council owned subsidary Queenstown Airport Ltd, initially gave the green light for the deal last year and members on council are now opposing it and have completed a comprehensive 76 page report on it and have come to various conclusions as only a long winded ratepayer funded report can.

Their main point seems to be that Auckland Airport paid too much for their shareholding:

Page 41 of the report finds that the price paid by AIA for the first tranche shares (24.99%) was $6.91 per share:
“This incorporates a discount of approximately 7.5% on the value of 100% of the shares assessed by QAC and AIAL at that time of $7.47 per share. This discount is relatively low (and the price per share relatively high) for non-controlling, albeit large shareholding and may, arguably, have included a ‘strategic premium’ to gain a cornerstone stake.” – PricewaterhouseCoopers.
This is something I agree with, they did in the short term but perhaps not over the long-term as there have already been some good gains on the balance sheet for AIA.

The disclosure in this report that AIA has paid a significant premium to the present day value of the company surely runs counter to the council's opposition to the AIA/Queenstown ports arrangement? The Queenstown Airport and by default the council (which majority owns the airport) got good value for the 24.99% stake and for Queenstown ratepayers and they should be given a pat on the back for extracting every last cent out of AIA that they have. This clearly should bode well for AIA in court proceedings brought against AIA by QLDC/Queenstown Community Strategic Assets Group (QCSAG) and Air New Zealand Ltd [AIR.NZX].

There has also been an agreement by both Queenstown Airport and AIA that the option to by a further stake up to 35% is going to be given the bullet:

“On one hand Queenstown Airport could have received further cash of between $11 million and $21 million, of which the community could have received a sizable portion (around $10 million) as a dividend. On the other hand if Council ownership fell below 75% it would no longer have control of the constitution,” Ms Lawson said.
In the event that the Council’s shareholding fell below 75% page 38 of the report stated:
“It will no longer have control of the constitution, be able to pass special resolutions and pass ordinary resolutions without a meeting of shareholders. It will still have in excess of 50% of the ordinary shares and so will be able to pass ordinary resolutions and control the composition of the Board. However moving below 75% will diminish the control the Council can exercise over the Company.” – PricewaterhouseCoopers.
This important development pretty much removes any opposition to the deal where AIA has a 24.99% stake, clearly still has some board influence but will not attain a sizable controlling stake in the business, points which the local council, local business people and Air NZ have issues about.

The latest developments pretty much put Queenstown Airport in the box seat as far as their partnership with AIA goes. They have a cornerstone shareholder that has allowed them to release much needed capital back onto the balance sheet and they can also use the expertise, management and size of Auckland Airport to leverage growth for the Queenstown Port.

Lets be clear though, it will be mutually beneficial for both partners but Queenstown Airport is in the box seat and will make its business decisions as it sees fit.

The High Court Judicial Review latter on this year on the port deal looks tenuous for the proponents.

Disc I own AIA shares in the Share Investor Portfolio


Queenstown Airport Buyout @ Share Investor

Auckland Airport CEO on Queenstown Airport Fracas
Queenstown Airport: Court Case looks set to Drag
Queenstown Airport: Loud Voices & Loyalty
Queenstown Airport: Air New Zealand's Crocodile Tears
Queenstown Airport: AIA purchase good Long-Term but will cost shareholders Short-Term

AIA @ Share Investor

Share Investor Q & A: Auckland Airport's Simon Moutter
Auckland Council look set for a Auckland Airport Takeover
Auckland City Council new AIA Policy Doc
Make me an offer I cant refuse: Auckland International Airport Ltd
Long Term View: Auckland International Airport
VIDEO - Simon Moutter on Australian Airport Purchase
Auckland Airport Capital Raising a fair call
Auckland International Airport lands Australian Ports
What Infratil sale of Auckland Airport stake means...
Is another Auckland Airport bid likely under a business friendly Government?
Latest Airport coverage
Cullen's move on Auckland Airport has far reaching effects
Cullen's move on AIA tax plan Anti-Business
AIA profit stays grounded
Softening opposition to CPPIB bid for AIA
Directors of AIA bribe brokers not to sell
What is Auckland Airport worth to you?
Second bite at AIA by CPPIB might just fly
AIA new directors must focus on shareholders
Auckland Airport merger deal nosedives
The Canadians have landed
AIA incentive scheme must fly out the window
Government market manipulation over AIA/DAE deal
DAE move on AIA: Will it fly?


Discuss this Stock @ Share Investor Forum - Register free
Download AIA Company Reports



Think Bigger: How to Raise Your Expectations and Achieve Everything

THINK BIGGER: HOW TO RAISE YOUR EXPECTATIONS AND ACHIEVE EVERYTHING
BY MICHAEL HILL






c Share Investor 2011