Tuesday, October 28, 2008

VIDEO: TV ONE 3rd John Key Helen Clark debate, Nov 5 2008





Helen Clark and John Key are all smiles in the final leaders' debate before the election - source ONE News



Watch the last debate between John Key and Helen Clark, broadcast live on TV One Wednesday 5 November 2008 , 7.00 pm and posted here shortly afterwards for you to watch in excruciating detail and the ability to slow down Helen Clark's lips as she lies her way towards another term in office.



Ist TV One Leaders debate





c Political Animal 2008



Labour plays race card twice in one week

So the answer to all our problems is for Labour to establish a free to air taxpayer funded "Pacific Islands" TV channel:

Labour would make establishing a free-to-air Pacific Islands television channel a priority if it wins re-election.


This is the second time this week that Labour has used the race card in the run up to the 2008 Election.

Earlier this week it was Helen Clark and her pointless racially motivated dig at Lockwood Smith for expressing the facts about migrant workers and now a bid for votes in South Auckland by buying our pacific cuzzies a TV station.

Remember the cost of the Maori TV station?  Well over $100 million and counting, and this time likely to cost more than that.

Apart from the racial separatism, New Zealand simply cannot afford this kind of luxury. 

What happened to the closed cheque book that Saint Helen talked about earlier this week? 




c Political Animal 2008



Monday, October 27, 2008

VIDEO: TV ONE Minor Party Debate, 27 October 2008

Tonight's TV One minor party debate was a mish mash of political dinosaurs and hucksters vying for your vote and vying for support from either of the two major parties.

Some were clear about their choice for major party; the Greens, Anderton Peter Dunne and Rodney Hide, but others were less clear; Winston Peters and The Maori Party:


The ONE News Election 08 Kingmakers Debate, October 27 2008

Winston Peters VS Kiwis

I haven't revisited the Winston Peters payola saga, because quite frankly the amount of time and energy put into it has been wasted. 


Nothing anyone has done has been able to put Peters where he belongs. Behind the bars of a prison.

Most of us know he is a crook and wouldn't spit at him if his fancy taxpayer suit caught on fire but there are those that are so deluded and bitter with the world that they will vote for him in spite of us all. 

They have a right to be stupid.

The Serious Fraud Office failure to go after him for secret donations from the Vela Family and Sir Robert Jones is merely another gap in law that allows politician from all hues to get away with breaking such laws because of technicalities and time restricted legislation.

Peters is as guilty as they come, morally and legally and in another jurisdiction would be doing time with petty crims, rapists and murderers but our light fisted legal and justice system has let him off.

Forget that he also stole $158,000 of taxpayer money before the 2005 Election and has so far refused to pay it back. Forget that he took money from a billionaire, lied about it in tandem with his lawyer, then continued to lie to try and squirm his way out.

Forget that money paid to him from the Velas was reciprocated by Peters pouring millions of taxpayer dollars into the racing industry. Forget also that he lied about the Sir Robert Jones donation, how much it was and who solicited it.

Forget that he continues to lie to this day about every part of his political funding process.

Just remember before you vote this November 8.

Winston Peters has lied, cheated and bought his way through 30 years of his Parliamentary career and while that might be a perfect CV for a politician he simply should have no place in politics representing New Zealanders.


c Political Animal 2008

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Cullen has put NZ financial sytem in grave danger

Michael Cullen's belated move last week to guarantee deposits in the wake of a major world credit meltdown is his dumbest move ever as Finance Minister in 9 years and puts our banking and financial system at massive risk.


We needed a deposit guarantee system but it needed to be properly put together, with guarantees for interbank lending, which is the real crux of the credit meltdown, and a guarantee of deposits at our stable banks, not finance companies, which have a much higher risk and offer higher interest rates than banks.

In the haphazard way in which it the deposit guarantee has been constructed, it has already distorted various financial markets and had a run on money coming from banks, managed funds, the New Zealand stockmarket and proceeds from recent house sales and going towards risky and dodgy finance companies.

And why wouldn't you put your money into finance companies?

They now have the same guarantees as the major banks but with higher returns !

Cullen has now produced a scenario that the banks, which were receiving money from finance companies because they were too risky and most of them dodgy, are now unfairly put at risk themselves as depositors money is removed from their vaults to go to higher return finance companies.

This is a nightmare unfolding and in effect puts the major banks at a huge disadvantage. They would have been more financially sound had Cullen done nothing.

Unfortunately Michael Cullen can do little to ameliorate the problem because hundreds of millions of dollars have already been transferred to finance companies and it wouldn't now be prudent to backtrack, practically and of course for himself and Labour would be politically disastrous.

What he could easily do now, since he has interfered already, is direct finance companies to limit their future interest rates and therefore stem the run on banks.

Unfortunately we have a man who is pig headed, does things politically instead of for practical reasons, is way out of his depth and experience and far too slow to react.

The man the he criticises, far from being an opportunist, is able to make the sorts of decisions that Cullen should have made; quickly, timely and with far more experience and accuracy.

As a currency trader, timing for John Key was crucial; not months, not weeks, not days, not hours, not minutes but seconds separated him from making a bad or a good decision.

And he was working in Trillions of dollars everyday, so today's economic climate is comparably like a walk in the park.

We all know how good he was at his job.

Cullen is not yesterdays man, he simply was never up to the job of Finance Minister in the first place and needs to fall on the sharp corners of his faux gold edged framed Doctorate of History degree before he ruins us financially.




POLL: TV One Colmar Brunton Poll, 26 October 2008

According to the latest TV  ONE News Colmar Brunton poll for 26 October 2008, National have slipped two points.

A mini trend that has closed the gap from more than 20 points to 12 has happened over the last few polls.

The previous year-long plus trend was a large National lead:

The poll released on Sunday shows National without an absolute majority for the first time in a year.

The last poll a week ago showed National 14 points ahead of Labour, but this has now narrowed to 12 points.

The National Party has dropped back three points, down to 47%. Labour has also dropped back by one point, now on 35%. Labour's friends, the Green Party have bounced back, up to 8%. Meanwhile, New Zealand First is on 3%, edging closer to the magic 5% threshold.

The Maori Party is sitting on 2.8%, however, their focus is on the electorate seats, so they will not be too concerned with the low party vote. The Act Party is still just above 2%.

Under those numbers, National has 59 seats in parliament and would need the three Act seats to get a majority of 62. UnitedFuture has one seat and would line up with National.

In opposition, Labour has 44 seats, the Greens have 10 and the Progessives one seat.

The Maori Party has four seats, but will not yet say who they will side with, and with these numbers, New Zealand First is out of parliament.

Key is still the preferred choice for Prime Minister on 38% but the race has closed right up. Clark is now breathing down Key's neck on 37%, up by three points. 

More

Polls were expected to close as the election drew nearer but National is still expected to win the majority of seats and votes on election night.


Colmar Brunton Polls

Friday, October 24, 2008

POLL: Roy Morgan Poll, 24 October 2008

The Latest Roy Morgan Poll for October 24 2008 shows a comfortable lead for National and is in stark contrast to the October 10 Roy Morgan poll which showed Labour and National as close as 4.5%.


It is hard to see how  polling could vary by such a large amount over just a week without questioning the validity of last weeks poll which showed a break in the year long trend that today's poll re-confirms.

Federal Poll : Finding No. 4330 : This latest Morgan Poll on voting intention was conducted by telephone with a New Zealand-wide cross-section of 743 electors from October 6-19, 2008. : October 24, 2008

In mid October 2008 with the “World Financial Crisis” worsening the New Zealand Roy Morgan Poll shows National Party support at 43% (up 2.5%), a healthy lead over the Labour Party 32% (down 5.5%). If the Election were held this weekend the National Party would form Government with the help of a minor party.

Support for the Greens 11.5% (up 2.5%) is at its highest level since the last election, while support for NZ First is 4.5% (up 0.5%), ACT NZ 3.5% (unchanged), the Maori Party 2.5% (up 0.5%), Progressive Party 0.5% (down 0.5%), United Future 0.5% (down 0.5%) and Others and Independents 2% (up 0.5%).

The Roy Morgan New Zealand Consumer Confidence Rating (97.0 points, down 5.3 points) has dropped sharply, falling back below 100 after only a few weeks in ‘positive territory’. Only 23% of New Zealanders expect New Zealand as a whole to have good times economically over the next 12 months.
Full article.

There will be another couple of polls this weekend, from Fairfax Nielson and Colmar Brunton and one last round of polls from the 4 main pollsters next week before an embargo the week of the election.

c Political Animal 2008

Friday Funny

Who would Helen Clark turn straight for?


POLL: NZ Herald Digipoll, October 24 2008

The latest New Zealand Herald Digipoll for October 24 2008 shows National still with a commanding lead ahead of Labour.  This continues the trend of big leads for National and contrast yesterdays TNS poll:

If the poll results were translated into votes, National could govern alone with 50.4 per cent of decided voters and 63 seats.

Prime Minister and Labour leader Helen Clark has improved in the preferred Prime Minister stakes, by 2.3 points, putting her fractionally ahead of National leader John Key, 45.4 per cent to 44.8 per cent. It is the first time she has been ahead since January.

Labour's 37 per cent poll figure means it would be able to muster 54 seats with the Progressives and the Greens.

The Maori Party, with four seats, would not hold the balance of power. Nor would it do so if it won all seven Maori seats but stayed on its 2.4 per cent poll rating in the party vote.

NZ Herald

It looks likely that National party will govern alone based on today's polling.


Herald Digipolls


c Political Animal 2008


Thursday, October 23, 2008

Long-term portfolio view wins the investing battle

Carrying on from last weeks look at my Portfolio and how it is getting a pasting, I have to make a point to those that have poked their ignorant little tongues at my propensity to invest in companies for the long-term.

As many who follow the Share Investor Blog might know I follow Warren Buffett's approach to investing as much as I can; buy stocks at a price that I consider value for the long-term, in good companies that have a competitive advantage, a good track record, excellent prospects for growth and good dividends.

The bulk of my portfolio is around 6 years old, but I have added some more stocks with additional money and dividend income.

My portfolio is currently up by around 7% when tax credits are included and in my not so humble opinion, considering the pasting global stockmarkets have been getting over the last year and especially in the last month a stockmarket meltdown rivaling the 1987 crash and yet my portfolio has performed extremely well.

This is principally because I have taken a long-term view to my stockmarket investing, received healthy dividends, re-invested most of them and haven't sold and because of that it has put the portfolio in good stead during the inevitable current downturn.

Of course, short-term things could get worse but long-term you will wish you didn't sell up because I will still be there when you start buying again.


Recent Share Investor Reading

Related Amazon Reading

Bear Market Investing Strategies (Wiley Trading)
Bear Market Investing Strategies (Wiley Trading) by Harry D. Schultz
Buy new: $58.93 / Used from: $16.99
Usually ships in 24 hours


c Share Investor 2008

Deluded media beat-up denies public the truth

The media attention to Lockwood Smith's comments 2 days ago about immigrants and their abilities or otherwise to do particular jobs or the inability to toilet themselves without coaching were interesting.


It wasn't the comments that were controversial in any way whatsoever because certain races do have particular physical or mental traits that make them good at one thing and crap at another. Lockwood Smith was simply conveying the truth, from information passed on by employers who have experience with immigrant workers.

The controversy really lies at the reaction from the politically correct media, lefty politicians and John Key's over the top reaction to publicly censor Smith for no particular reason other than he might have pissed a few Wellington egg heads off, and to get the snivelling media off his back.

For Smith to have to apologise to professional racist Taniana Turia is really scraping the barrel of filth.

One might also like to point out that the All Blacks have mostly Island and Maori Boys, the Tall Blacks have mostly tall players, most sprinters and the majority of NBA players are black, jockeys are small and light and mostly white and the New Zealand Woman's netball team is, well, fully comprised of women.

All participants in these sports are picked because of their particular abilities and certainly black athletes prevail in sports that require strength, speed, and brute force.

Nothing racist about picking people by ability in this way at all, or to point it out, like Lockwood Smith did, that this is the case.

To vilify an individual in this way by using PC group speak such as "racist" and "bigot" is merely giving way to an intellectually bankrupt idea that those that speak the loudest, with inappropriate labeling and have the opportunity to do so-such as the media and barking mad socialists like Helen Clark-are right simply because someone might be "offended" by the truth.

What this does is stifle free and open speech and quite simply removes us several factors away from truth and therefore democracy.

Interesting that David Cunliffe, who apparently has a propensity to try and eradicate racism from the face of the earth had a go at the Asian accent Benny Hill Style in 2005 when he mocked Pansy Wong's  in Parliament but little was made of it by the mainstream media.

Go figure.




.

POLL: TV3 TNS Poll, 23 October 2008

The latest TV3 TNS political poll for October 23 still shows a clear lead for the National Party:

National is steady on 45.1 percent, and Labour actually drops to 37.4 percent. But the Greens are on 8.8 percent, and can be added to Labour's total.

New Zealand First has crept up to 3.5 percent, so Winston Peters cannot be ruled out making a return to Parliament. National leader John Key will be sweating - remember he has ruled working with Peters out.

The Maori Party is on 2.3 percent, but they are expected to win six, or perhaps even all seven Maori seats. ACT is on 1.7 percent, with just two MPs.

Peter Dunne's United Future is pretty unpopular, polling at 0.2 percent, as were the Progressives, on 0.1.

On this poll, Parliament would overhang to 123 seats. National would have 57 seats, ACT two, and United Future one – a total of 60 seats, and not enough to govern. In opposition Labour has 47 seats, the Greens 11 and the Progressives one – a total of 59, also not enough to govern.

TV3.co.nz

The TNS poll is one of 4 different political polls done in New Zealand and the most inaccurate of the 4.

Other polls have shown a much larger lead for national and have consistently done so for almost 2 years.

c Political Animal 2008

Leaving the nest

The latest stats for immigration of Kiwis to Oz is a record number, no surprise there, those that have money, prospects, ambition and are sick to death with government interference in their lives, to the extent now they want regulate shower times, are leaving. Sure it is the easy way out, why not stay and fight?


Well, it is increasingly getting difficult to stay because of the heavy burden that Labour have laid on them. 

What is clear is that the 47, 200 New Zealanders leaving will just be the tip of the iceberg should Labour get re-elected come Novemeber 8:

Figures published by Statistics New Zealand yesterday show about 47,200 people left New Zealand for Australia on a permanent or long-term basis during the year to September. About 13,200 came the other way.

That produced a net outflow of 33,900 people from NZ to Australia - the highest since records were first compiled in 1978.

The previous peak was 33,700 in January 1989.

NZ Herald

I personally will be leaving to go somewhere(I can hear a collective cheer from some) either Dallas or somewhere in Australia and will take my wife, money and hard-working taxpaying arse with me because the future would be bleak with another Marxist, socialist Labour Government.

We can look forward to more of the same bullshit. More welfare, more Government interfering, more mis-managing of the economy, more State directed dependence, crumbling government services and yes, shorter showers.

Part of me wants to see Labour returned to power so they can completely stuff up the possibility of being re-elected for a generation but I care too much about this country to see that happen.

It is going to be tough going for any government over the next 5 or six years because of the economic direness that Labour have managed us into but the coming tough times will have John Key in his element. Finance and economics is his specialty.

To have the Helen and Mikey show again is going to be fantastic for Air New Zealand and for those leaving on their planes to Australia, they will do well, because the best people are leaving and most will not come back.

The record numbers presently leaving will look small in proportion to those if a Labour government is re-elected.

Vote wisely this election.

c Political Animal 2008

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Shareholders should look for companies with fiscal disaster plans

One thing to consider for shareholders with stocks in New Zealand listed companies is managements planning for and reaction to the current credit crises and its associated recession-the one we are currently experiencing is the work of Michael Cullen, New Zealands Finance Minister.

The current recession is going to get worse because of the downturn in the global economy and that is clearly going to affect business in this country and our business leaders, CEOs and directors are going to be soundly tested over the next couple of years as they try to manage their businesses through a recession that could be worse than the one in the 1970s if not managed properly and may very well last longer.

How well have our CEOs prepared for this?

The recession in New Zealand has been indicated by the economic numbers for more than 6 months, so as shareholders we should expect that prudent managers have put the necessary groundwork into a business plan that will get them through the hard years coming.

What plans should they have made?

Well, clearly cutting any unnecessary costs first would be a priority, but there are a number of other things that could and should still be done and you should do some thorough research into our NZX listed companies above and beyond the normal facts and figures one looks at. How management have spent their shareholder dollars in the past and whether they even have plans to get them through a recession are a couple of good points to start on.

Pay down that outstanding debt as much as possible and cut back dividends (I know, that is hard to say) to shareholders and use that to pay down debt in the future-interest rates are set to rise and the terms of lending and the ability to borrow will be tougher.

Cull company middle management as much as possible, little is done by middle management anyway so they wont be missed and the company team will be able to communicate better and more efficiently without them.

Forgo massive directors fee price hikes. Now isn't the time for a pay rise and the next reporting season in February isn't likely to make shareholders think you deserved a rise anyway.

On average, of the 18 odd companies that I have shares in, directors are asking for around 25% more than last year. They don't deserve that much based on the August reporting season, let alone next years results.

Contact Energy for example are asking for 100% more in directors fees! I know, its more over the top than a pregnant Dolly Parton.

Re-visit contracts with suppliers and negotiate lower prices for future contracts where possible. The current economic climate will mean that some companies will do better deals just to do business-hopefully not the one that you own shares in though.

Put off non-core related capital spending-those company Commodores will last another few years more and image isn't everything if it means there is no company left because you just bought or leased 50 spanking new Toyota Prius'.

Good management will be cost conscious even at the best of economic times and that is clearly the best preparation for the tough times.

Some Kiwi listed companies that have done this well are Mainfreight, Freightways, Michael Hill International and Hallenstein Glasson.

Companies that have done this poorly include Sky City Entertainment, Auckland International Airport ,The Warehouse and Contact Energy.

I am a little annoyed that along with the vast amount of shareholder correspondence that we have all received this reporting season, scant column inches have been devoted to mapping out a plan for individual companies and how they will deal with a long economic downturn.

Yes, it would be nice to know our companies have a plan.

Good fiscal management should be a matter of course for all companies, countries, finance Ministers and individuals because living beyond ones means can get one into trouble and planning before a downturn hits can be crucial for company survival.

But even as we continue our way through the recession continued financial prudence is needed, even by those who have already prepared.

For those who haven't?

Well, some are definitely going to fail and that is just the way it should be.

Disclosure: I own Mainfreight, The Warehouse, Michael Hill, Freightways, Sky City, Auckland Airport and Hallenstein shares.

c Share Investor 2008

Labour's taxpayer funded election supported by their Electoral Finance Act

In 2005 Labour stole over $800,000 of your money to print pledge cards to buy the election that year and when taken to task decided to change the law retrospectively to make what they did legal.


December 2007 the Electoral Finance Act was passed by Labour and its lap dogs in Parliament.

The law was sloppy, badly drafted, contradictory, anti free speech, impossible to use clearly and favoured the incumbent government in an election year, in terms of election funding and right to speak freely.

Less than 3 weeks before the 2008 election and it is 2005 all over again, except this time the passing of the EFA means that what was illegal in 2005 is now legal.

The contentious issue in 2008 is Labour's "information kit for the over-60s", a 50 page volume (it ain't a pamphlet as Labour call it) that has cost taxpayers more than $60,000 when you include postage and other costs and has gone out to 64,000 oldies.

My argument here isn't about the fact of whether or not it is electioneering at taxpayer expense because it clearly is, what is in question is the passing of the EFA by Labour to make election advertising at taxpayer expense such as this legitimate.

The "information kit" was designed by Labour to circumvent statutes in their law that would otherwise deem it advertising and thus make the cost of it come back on the Labour Party not the taxpayer.

It is also clear that the part of the EFA that pertains to Labours ability to circumvent its own law is the only part of the act that is clear otherwise the Electoral Commission wouldn't have given the document their approval-even though they have previously said that the EFA was hard to define, impossible to interpret clearly and highly contradictory.

A cynical ploy to get around previous laws and allow Labour to do what they did in 2005?

You bet ya.

Not only did it make spending by legitimate third parties like the Brethren illegal unless they went through the expense and electoral red tape of registering themselves as a third party, in effect it made it OK to steal taxpayer funds to run your election campaign but for a willing individual or group it becomes very difficult.

Once again mainstream media is found wanting when it comes to questioning the Labour Party over what is now a "mis-use" of taxpayer funds and not the illegal act that it was in 2005, to persuade over 60s voters to vote for labour but in 2005 a legitimate organisation, the Brethren and the National were run over the coals for doing the same thing, except it was done willingly with private money, not hard earned taxpayer dosh.

It seems my reasons for protesting twice over the last year have been vindicated and I can only shake my head in disbelief as we roll hopelessly toward a Mugabe like dictatorship.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Heads Up

A little birdy has told me there is more from Ian Wishart over the donations for passports scandal that Labour has been involved in and the mainstream media has pretty much ignored and misreported.


Unless Wisharts new stuff is a knockout blow, I doubt whether mainstream media will show it the due attention it clearly deserves.

I think it is probably due to lack of resources and or priorities. The mainstream seem to be too busy following leaders around while they kiss babies, waiting for Saint Helen to get angry or Winston Peters mouthing off by being a racist pig for political mileage.  

Investigative Journalism seems to be something left to the "fringe" these days and while Ian Wishart is one of the best at it, he sometimes gets it wrong.

I guess Journos too have become rather blase' about the corruption of the incumbent Government.

Perhaps its supporters have as well.

How bloody sad.


Come and knock on my door

I just wonder out loud to nobody particular, if National or any other party are so desperate to get their feet on the parliamentary carpet then why haven't seen any knocking on my door?


As much as I loath most pollies, it takes balls to knock on someones door not knowing the political persuasion of the occupant or if you are a National Party campaigning in Otara, not knowing if you will get lynched.

Anyone coming to my door with their brand of politics gets my respect, Labour, NZ First, the Greens, and Labour will eventually get the bums rush they deserve but I will listen and debate, that is what politics should be all about.

If you are a political party wanting to sway swinging voters(not voters who swing) the personal touch is a very good way of making peoples minds up.

It is also cheap and doesn't breach the Electoral Finance Act if one has gone over budget.

It works for Rodney Hide in Epsom.

Im still waiting.


c Political Animal 2008


Monday, October 20, 2008

Government survey extends nanny State further

Are Helen Clark and her Labour Government "Mugabe like", as the Maori Party contends she is?


You decide:

Statistics NZ has been labelled threatening and heavy-handed by one respondent, who was sent a highlighted copy of the Statistics Act penalties schedule when he complained and tried to quit.

In 2002, 22,000 people were randomly selected to take part in the Statistics NZ Survey of Family, Income and Employment.

Wairarapa graphic artist Alistair Hughes has taken part for six years, but he and his wife asked to be excused last year as they thought the survey had become an offensive invasion of privacy. They were asked detailed questions relating to their income and expenditure, personal health and what surgery they might have had.

Statistics NZ wrote back telling Mr Hughes he was legally obliged to complete the survey, "though it is important we gain the cooperation of all those selected to take part", the letter said.

The highlighted penalty schedule was attached.

Standard of living manager Andrea Blackburn said though some people were reluctant to take part in the survey, they eventually agreed and there had been no prosecutions to date.

"Most people are willing to complete surveys once their value to New Zealand is explained," she said.

The survey is the first nationally representative, long-term study done in New Zealand. It was done randomly to ensure an even spread of respondents.

Mrs Blackburn said the data provided a valuable picture of changes in Kiwis' economic wellbeing. It was used to plan a range of issues - from retirement planning and programmes that helped move people into work, to determining levels of support for families and children.

"Used to plan a range of issues"?

When did anything the Government "plan" go right

Standard of living manager Andrea Blackburn said though some people were reluctant to take part in the survey, they eventually agreed and there had been no prosecutions to date.

Stuff.co.nz

New Zealand has a "standard of living" manager?  WTF?

I wonder Andrea if a criminal prosecution and a large fine might have something to do with the zero prosecution rate.

This is the sort of nonsense we can do without, an extension of nanny State that serves no purpose and clearly hasn't been of any benefit so far as the results of the survey seem to have led to increased welfare, poorer education, increases in crime, a crumbling health system and a whole lot of other government planning stuff that simply doesn't work.

It does work well in one of its key objectives though.

It interferes in peoples lives where government is not wanted or needed.


c Political Animal 2008




.

TV3, 60 Minutes, Owen Glenn Doco, Monday 20 October 2008

An interesting TV3 60 Minutes segment on Monday 20 October 2008 is the story of Owen Glenn, and some more input on donations to New Zealand First and the Labour Party and his regret at doing so.


Reporter Karen McCarthy meets the man who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to New Zealand political parties, and then regretted every cent.

This is Owen Glenn as you have never seen him before. He is having fun handing out his money, sunning himself on an exclusive Fijian Island with his gorgeous entourage and talking about his life.

Why does he want to donate so much of his wealth? How rich is he anyway? What kind of happiness does extreme money bring? And is he as lonely as he sometimes looks?



A timely reminder of how low the present caretaker Government, the Labour Party are, and just one of the scandals they have been involved in this year, the latest one being the donation for passport saga.


c Political Animal 2008

Sunday, October 19, 2008

POLL: TV One Colmar Brunton Poll: 19 October 2008

The latest Colmar Brunton TV One poll for 19 October 2008 shows a slight gain by Labour and a small drop in support for National.


The TV One Colmar Brunton poll released tonight shows National down one point to 50 per cent support and Labour up three points to 36 per cent.

The gap was 14 points compared with 18 a week ago.

On 50 per cent support National would have 61 seats in Parliament and Labour 44.

NZ Herald.co.nz

The latest Colmar Brunton poll continues the trend of a large lead for National, which has been the case for more than a year.


Mainstream media reluctant players in Labour's passport for donation scandal



It is interesting to see mainstream media reaction to Ian Wishart's major scoop in his TGIF Edition electronic newspaper.

Wishart's expose' of donations to Labour for a New Zealand passport have had exposure in the New Zealand Herald:

The Herald on Sunday understands Yang Liu donated $5000 to Cabinet minister Chris Carter's Te Atatu electorate committee before the last election. Wagering a bob each way, he also met National's John Key and donated another $5000 to that party.


We find out additionally that National have received a donation also, but they were not aware of his dodgy background, Labour was, and that is the story here. We also know that larger donors usually give similar donations to each major party so as to not show bias or arouse any suspicion.

We can all surmise who was given the 5000 first. 

From Stuff.co.nz , NZ Heralds main competitor, we have nothing at all.

This is their alternative headline instead:

An Australian bookmaker has John Key as a certainty to be our next prime minister, while the odds on Helen Clark retaining her job have blown out to $A5.


No wonder I don't buy the Sunday Star Times anymore(I don't buy the Herald anymore either for different reasons).

If you dont look past TV3s misleading main headline and first paragraph,which is the way many people get their news, you could be forgiven for thinking that National have done something horribly wrong:

The thorny issue of political donations is back, only this time it is not New Zealand First but Labour and National who are on the receiving end. Both parties have accepted money from a man called 'Bill Liu' who is reported to be a criminal in China, his country of birth...

It is not until well into the TV3 story that you get to the meat of the matter, that Labour have turned a blind eye to Yang Liu's dodgy past and given him a New Zealand Passport. Receiving $5000 from him at the same time is, once again, the story.

Tv One had a story last night on the scandal but I cannot find anything on their website. Instead we have this as the leading political story:

A Fairfax Nielsen poll has the Labour party languishing at 33% , but Helen Clark remains a popular choice to lead the country... more

A rehashing of the Fairfax Poll out on Friday and good spin for Labour.

The Labour Party Blog, The Standard, took a while to get spinning but the laughs just keep coming from them in The best that They've got? :

The allegation of corruption is simply dumb. Liu gave a small amount of money to both major parties, the Minister correctly stood aside from the decision given his personal acquaintance with Liu. The idea that Labour is giving citizenship to people who give them $5000 donations is laughable, the guy isn’t even a Labour man he has just been getting to know politicians, regardless of party. Indeed, he seems to have known National better.

Of course National are not the government and they didn't grant a passport to an individual who also gave money to them. Labour did, and that, yet again, is the story here. 

]We need to know more.

The best that "they" can come up with? Very conspiratorial if you ask me.

The they that the Labour Party writer talks about is but one person, Ian Wishart, not a leftist Labour Party cabal set up to dig insubstantial dirt on National as has been the Labour Party's modus operandi for many years and especially over the last few months.

No wonder I am bitter and twisted.

At least I still have my looks to fall back on.

Passport scandal @ Political Animal 




c Political Animal 2008



The two faces of subterfuge


The two different identities of the man that Ian Wishart has fingered in the donations for citizenship scandal that has hit Labour this weekend.


Yang Liu, a Chinese National, has donated money to the Labour Party, so Wishart has said.

It has yet to be established how deep the links to Labour go with this individual but Labour are not talking and are currently in damage mode.

With Ian Wishart anything is possible but he says he has documentation to back up his story and New Zealanders will look with interest as to whether mainstream media will pick this potential big story up and do some decent investigation into the allegations and their validity.

Things certainly look very very fishy and we have a right to know before an election if Ian Wishart's story has a sound basis in fact because if even half true it once again goes to the dishonesty of the current government and the fact they will do anything to get re-elected. 

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Whaleoil & KiwiBlog: 1 + 1 = at least 2

From KiwiBlog and Whaleoil come some lighthearted shenanigans with photo shop software and a Labour Party billboard.

In case you have your head in the clouds or somewhere else, It is in reference to the cash for passports accusation that Ian Wishart has made.

Labour’s official billboard.

Clever little arseholes those guys are too.

c Political Animal & those other guys, oh and Labour too

Labour in Spin mode over immigration scandal

The standard line taken directly from Labours political handbook over the passport for donations scandal has been played out today in reaction to Ian Wisharts latest expose'.


"All citizenship decisions are made by the Minister of Internal Affairs, except where there may be an actual or perceived conflict of interest," said Mr Barker.

In that circumstance, a decision was made by another minister.

Mr Barker said an investigation was being made into "the possibility of immigration fraud in this case".

He did not want to jeopardise this process, and there would be no further comment from ministers.

NZ Herald.co.nz

No further comment was the line from Labour before the 2005 election over the Phillip Field immigration scandal which is now before the courts but this time the implications for Labour are much more serious. There are allegations made by Wishart that the individual at the centre of the scandal, Yang Liu, a Chinese National with several identities, has made donations to Labour in return for New Zealand citizenship and the much coveted New Zealand passport.

Watch now for Labour Party insiders, directed by Labour leak some sort of baseless lie or "leaked tape" to misdirect the groveling leftist media again.

This is another standard Labour political line when they are in a corner.

A Fairfax Poll out today indicates that Labour Party muck raking directed at National has had no effect and the opposition still have a clear and consistent lead, which has been the trend for nearly two years.

Read Wisharts full account of the money for passports scandal


c Political Animal 2008


POLL: Fairfax Nielson, 18 Oct 2008



More bad news for Labour. In a continuing trend of polls for almost 2 years the latest Fairfax Media poll shows another comfortable lead for National:

Today's Fairfax Nielsen poll suggests voters have been largely unmoved by the rapidly unfolding events of recent weeks, including a worsening economic outlook in the wake of the international credit crisis, the big campaign launches on Sunday, the release of National and Labour's economic packages, and the first televised leaders' debate between Labour's Helen Clark and National's John Key.

The poll puts National on 51 per cent and Labour on 33 per cent - figures virtually unchanged from a month ago.

Only the Green Party makes it above the 5 per cent threshold for winning seats in Parliament, rising two points to 7 per cent.

The biggest change has been in the preferred prime minister ratings, with Miss Clark moving up five points to 35 per cent. Mr Key is down two points to 43 per cent.

Stuff.co.nz

Every poll bar one recent Roy Morgan Poll last week has shown a trend of a lead by National and in polling it is the trend that should be believed and the trend continues to show a strong lead for National and New Zealanders wanting a change of Government. 

Last weeks TV One Colmar Brunton Poll also confirms the trend established by the Fairfax poll

Interesting that last week Helen Clark belied the aforementioned Roy Morgan poll that showed the gap between Labour and National at a round 4 points but today's Fairfax Nielson poll which shows National well in the lead:

Mr Key said yesterday that the poll was encouraging, but there was still a long way to go, while Miss Clark made it clear she did not believe the result.

"That doesn't reflect the trend in other recent polls," she said.

Stuff.co.nz

Oh but it does Helen, it does.

Fairfax Nielson polls


Fairfax Nielson Poll: 20 Sept 2008

Fairfax Nielson Poll: August 16 2008

Fairfax Nielson Poll: 19 July 2008

Fairfax Neilson Poll: 21 June 2008

Fairfax Neilson Poll: 17 May 2008

Fairfax Neilson Poll: 23 Feb 2008

c Stuff.co.nz & Political Animal 2008