Showing posts with label 2011 Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2011 Election. Show all posts

Monday, November 21, 2011

2011 Election: A Choice between success and failure

In the last 5 days before the election voters must pause to look at the choices they have.


A vote for Labour and its fellow left travelers NZ First, the Green Party, and Hone Harawira will be a return to the nastiness, divisiveness and heavy hand of the nanny state that got the country into the mess this country is still trying to recover from.

Now that we are in tough global economic times Labour's economic prescription (if its leader and finance minister can remember what it is) of high taxes, increased borrowing and bigger government means within a possible 3 year term under their leadership we will see us needing a rescue from the IMF.

You simply cannot borrow and tax your way into prosperity, it is a recipe for economic disaster and voters should remember that is why we are in the position we are now after 9 years of economic mismanagement by Labour between 1999 and 2008.

The nats could do better to live within a budget with more cuts to Govt spending but that would cause social unrest and that is the last thing we need right now. We need good economic management in these tough times and they have proven themselves over the last 3 years of economic conditions not seen since the Great Depression.

You have a choice this Saturday. Vote Labour and face a forced sale of state assets (under National it will be done on our terms) and economic direction from the IMF or vote the nats and get moderate experienced economic management that has been proven to work over the last 3 years.

You decide.

Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011



Thursday, November 10, 2011

Labour Limbos to a new low



Supposedly this election for Labour was going to be about policy but so far it has just been a constant stream of personal attacks - doesn't work hard enough, is a liar, doesn't care about kids, yadda, yadda, yadda - on John Key with this one today as reported in Stuff.co.nz

"People at the top have got a lot of money and they take their holidays in Hawaii," Goff said.

"People at the bottom can't even afford to put good food on the table for their kids."

Key, a multi-millionaire, regularly holidays with his family at a home he owns in Hawaii.

Who the fuck cares, the public are sick of lets kick the rich guy because he has done well and most of us admire him for his hard work and success.

If Labour should have learned anything from the 2008 election then it would be that personal attacks on Johnny didn't work for them, in fact they backfired because the public really doesn't like the politics of envy

It has Trevor Mallard DNA all over it and mirrors the Labour Party attack on the middle income earner who they are going to tax more for "earning too much" to give to those either too lazy or those that cant legitimately work.

It is kinda nice watching the self-destruction of the left into a pool of their own hatred and jealously.

Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011





Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Labour to spend billions more on welfare

One would have thought Labour might have learned from their last 9 years in power that promising people free money through welfare schemes like Working for Families, paid maternity leave and taxpayer funded childcare is unaffordable at the best of times but during the worst economic times since the Great Depression extending all these vote buying schemes is morally, socially and fiscally wrong.


There may have been a ray of light in these policies if they had actually worked for the populace but Working for Families has incentivised staying on the same income and thereby lowering productivity, paid maternity leave and taxpayer funded childcare has drained taxpayer coffers so that those that don't qualify for this welfare are struggling to pay for these things themselves.

These things are not only unaffordable but they don't actually work in the long-term.

If welfare was such a success when introduced into New Zealand in the 1930s under Labour it would have seen itself bow out of existence because it would have cured all the ills politicians said it would.

Instead what we know has happened is that it has fostered crime, relative "poverty", child abuse and murder and made hundreds of thousands of us dependent on their fellow taxpayer.

There are more of us on welfare in New Zealand than at any other time in our history and clearly things are not well in the garden of eden.

You would think then, that politicians, especially those on the left, would learn that doing more of the same that has got us here is the pure definition of insanity.

State welfare doesn't work and we need to recognise that.

For Labour to ignore these facts, especially at a time when our economy could be on the brink of collapse over the next 5 years, just to buy votes for an election win is just suicide for the country as whole.

The money for all this extra spending will come from borrowing from China and increased and new taxes across the board for all workers. There is no other way this can happen.

Billions more in extra spending on non-productive policies and possible difficulties in borrowing more money means this would put the whole country in danger of defaulting sometime in the future.

Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011





Friday, November 4, 2011

Show me the Money: Money for Nothing & Everything free

http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/cartoo3.gif


Emmerson's take on Goff's cunning plan to win the 2011 Election.

On the money indeed.


Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011




Show me the Money: Labour hides borrowing & additional taxes

The political intrigue over Phil Goff's failure to accurately cost his election promises came to a head a few days ago at a Wednesday debate when John Key asked Goff to "show him the money".


Even the rabid left's John Armstrong is having a go at him over this serious leadership failure.

Goff had been found seriously wanting as his increased spending to buy an election win showed the flaws on the Labour election balance sheet. The increased debt exposure Goff that the Labour Party would put the country in at a time when debt used in the wrong way is looked at very suspiciously by our lenders and whoever leads us needs to tread the debt boards very carefully should we end up like Greece or the USA.

The billions of extra spending Goff has been campaigning on will come via borrowing from Mums and Dads in China and as there is still an unexplained gap after what Labour say they will borrow, Labour will do what they have always done and introduce a slew of news taxes on the middle classes and those "rich pricks" that Labour hammered in their previous 9 years in Government.

The only problem is there is still a massive gap in funding after the borrowing and funds raised from increased taxes and the only two conclusions the public can come to are that they will have to borrow more than indicated or what is more probable hit Kiwis with undisclosed new taxes or increases in current tax rates.

Phil Goff says he will show us the money today but his credibility must be looked at more than a little askance because one would have to ask why haven't these costings and important figures been calculated before promises were made? He says they have been but it has taken 2 days so far to produce his costings but so far not a sausage.

The public awaits to see with interest what this economic magician can pull out of his hat but judging on this latest incident should voters be putting their trust in someone with their hard earned taxpayer dollars whose maths would have 1+1 equal 3?


Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011



Tuesday, November 1, 2011

National's Welfare "Reform" : Is that it?

The much talked about "welfare reform" from the National Party has turned into a bit of an underwhelming damp squib for me:


"All of those currently on the unemployment and sickness benefits will be put on a new 'Jobseeker Support Benefit,' and required to look for full time work. Single parents with children aged over 14 would go on the same benefit.

Parents on the domestic purposes benefit would instead get 'Sole Parent Support' until their youngest turned 14.

Solo parents would be required to undergo work testing when their child turned one and would be expected to work at least part time when their youngest was five.

The term 'invalids benefit' would also be scrapped and those with permanent, severe disabilities and terminal illnesses would instead receive a "supported living payment."

They would not face work obligations". NZ Herald

Why wouldn't you make solo parents look for work after 12 weeks? People with jobs regularly go back to work to provide for the family and it seems a tad bizarre that solo parents would have the luxury of 5 years looking after little Johnny or Susie at home while the rest of us wage slaves only see our kids in the morning and evenings.

It seems like a good start but incentives really need to be focused on making it harder for Mums to pop out kids on the DPB and easier if one chooses to be honest with others and themselves and work for a living to support themselves and their family.

I wait in hope.

Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011




Monday, October 31, 2011

TV One Leaders debate, 31 October 2011

Goff and Key clash in fiery opening debate


The first leaders debate this evening between John Key & Phil Goff was an easy win to Key.

Phil started reasonably strongly but could only last about 5 minutes before he resorted to name calling, interrupting Key and the moderator.

This formula Goff stuck to for the full 90 minutes and it didn't work for him.

His media minder Brian Edwards clearly told him to be aggressive and engage with Key instead of the moderator and Goff managed to make Key look a bit awkward a few times as Key nodded his head politely to what he had to say.

After a while Key decided he wasn't going to turn to Goff in this manner and looked the better for it as Goff was found getting angry, butting in or smirking when Key was talking.

Key was confident where Goff was as convincing as Marty McFly's father in Back to the Future at times.

The Mr Angry routine just didn't do any favours for Goffy and he was left shouting in the wake of Key explaining policy while Goff wanted to talk over him.

The TV text poll rated the debate a 61/39 vote in Key's favour but I would put it at more like 70/30.

Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011




Loopy



This just posted on the Labour party Facebook site.

Says it all about their proposed rail loop really.


Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011



Twits of the week

Labour have a blog called "Red Alert" and have what I think is a weekly diatribe called Tweet of the Week.


They seem to be focused on their opposition and trivial stuff instead of the things potential Labour voters want to hear:

Screen shot 2011-10-30 at 5.14.54 PM


Just like Labour this tweet/twit doesn't make sense, so is lost on most kiwis bar Labour Party insiders and left-wing bloggers.


Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011




Green Party Election Campaign Opening




Contact: Metiria Turei & Russel Norman
Tag: Election 2011

VO METIRIA: This is a party political broadcast from the Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

VOX POPS:

>> I think a richer NZ would be one where the economy, and people and the environment are considered one system

>> There'd be more opportunities for everyone.

>> There'd be a better public transport system.

>> There'd be a decent minimum wage.

>> There'd be a smaller gap between the haves and have nots.

>> There'd be housing you could afford

>> I reckon in a richer NZ there would be more jobs

>> We'd have MMP.

>> Well, healthy food would be cheaper.

>> I think in a Richer NZ we'd measure success in more ways than just monetary gain.

RUSSEL:

Kia Ora I'm Russel Norman,

METIRIA:

Tena koutou I'm Metiria Turei,

Together we're the co-leaders of the Green party

METIRIA:

18 years ago I was a young mum on the DPB with no education, no prospects, but with this beautiful baby who needed me. And I needed help. I used the welfare system to take care of us both to go to university to get my law degree. I understand first hand how important a supportive government is. For me, a richer Aotearoa is one where every parent is valued and where every child has a roof over their head and food on the table.

RUSSEL:

I grew up in Australia, I came to NZ 15 years ago for work and for study and I loved it here and I have been here ever since.

I've worked in factories, on farms and in offices. I've got a doctorate of political science, I'm a member of parliament, and a dad.

I believe a richer New Zealand is one that works for our people and we look after the environment.

RUSSEL:

This election the Green Party has three priorities for the next three years, to help us build a Richer New Zealand.

We're going to clean up rivers, get kids out of poverty and grow green jobs.

RUSSEL:

We have a plan to stimulate 100,000 new green jobs through government leadership and business incentives.

METIRIA:

It will add resilience to our economy, without taking our country further into debt. And you can read all about the details on our website.

RUSSEL:

One action is extending the home insulation scheme we created to a further 200,000 homes.

METIRIA:

We will encourage businesses to join the green economy through research subsidies, and tax incentives. We need government support for sustainable services and products which can be sold around the world.

RUSSEL:

A good example of this is a kiwi company called Aquaflow. They've developed a way to turn sewage into bio fuel, fertilizer, and clean water.

METIRIA:

But we've got to keep it kiwi, with government support in partnership with investors we can keep our best and brightest anchored in New Zealand.

RUSSEL:

We get the ongoing benefits of jobs and research, and we don't lose all the profits overseas.

METIRIA:
And while we're on the topic, selling off our state assets, even "part sale" won't make New Zealand richer. The Green Party will keep our country's assets in public ownership and we will put them to work as catalysts for our common economic good.

RUSSEL

Global investment in clean energy will double to US$800 billion by 2015. With the right incentives, we can get at least 1% of that global market. Just 1% would generate billions of dollars in exports from Z and employ tens of thousands of people in green jobs, right here.

METIRIA

If you want New Zealand to get a piece of the clean energy action, you need to Party Vote Green.

VOX POPS:

>> In a richer NZ all our lakes would be clean.

>> I just want my kids to be able to swim in our estuary.

METIRIA:

GO! (kids jump in) haha, when I was a kid I used to swim in the mighty Manawatu… but now, it's one of the most polluted rivers in the world.

RUSSEL:

The good news is that we can clean it up.

The Green Party has a plan to make all our rivers and lakes clean enough to swim in again, just like this one. (kids splash) After all, It's every Kiwi kid's birthright.

METIRIA:

Having healthy waterways is good for our clean green brand which underpins our tourism and agricultural exports.

RUSSEL:

The Green Party will set standards to control the amount of water taken from our rivers and cut pollution going into them.

METIRIA:

We'll introduce fair charges for irrigation and use the funds to clean up our rivers, and create green jobs.

RUSSEL:

We need to support our farmers and industry to find solutions that work for everyone.

METIRIA:

A Green Party Vote at this election is a start to making our rivers clean enough to swim in again.

(splash)

VOX POPS:

>> Well I think in a Richer NZ there should be more care for parents and their young children.

>> Our kids are really important

METIRIA:

We're here at Edmund Hillary School in South Auckland to celebrate a positive story…

VO METIRIA:

As a decile 1 school they've had their fair share of challenges, but by developing their own Mahinga Kai gardening & learning programme they've changed attitudes and brought their community together to support each other.

RUSSEL:

It's a great start in the battle against some of the problems caused by real hardship.

Child poverty is a reality in our country, and the Greens plan to do something about it.

METIRIA:

We have developed four solutions to bring 100,000 children out of poverty by 2014.

VO METIRIA:

We will give parents on a benefit access to the training incentive allowance, helping them to study and take care of their kids.

VO RUSSEL:

We will extend Working for Families to 140,000 of the poorest households with children.

METIRIA:

We will raise the minimum wage to $15 immediately to help working parents provide for their children.

RUSSEL:

And we'll create insulation standards for rental properties to ensure warm, healthy homes for thousands of kids.

METIRIA:

Child poverty costs this country around $6b billion every year. If we invest just a fraction of that in our kids now, we will save money and save lives. Ensuring a better future for all of us.

RUSSEL:

We just need your party vote to make it happen.

VOX POPS:

>> A richer New Zealand would have more Green MPs.

>> I think we more Green MPs in Parliament.

RUSSEL:

The Greens are a growing, popular party, with fresh new way of looking at world we live in.

METIRIA:

New Zealand was the home of the world's first Green Party and we've been represented in Parliament now for well over a decade. We're a successful, independent party and we've delivered positive change regardless of who's been in government.

RUSSEL:

In just the last three years, working alongside Government we've made 100,000 homes warm and dry. We've got the funding for cycling, the cleanup of toxic sites, for pest control and more.

METIRIA:

Your vote can deliver more positive change in the next three years.

To find out more about what we believe in, and why you should support us this election, please visit our website

RUSSEL:

We have a full range of policies on economics, health, education, justice, and so much more

METIRIA:

If you share our vision for a richer New Zealand

One with clean rivers, where everyone has a job, and where every child has enough to eat …

RUSSEL

If you want a smart, green economy that works for everyone….

in this election…


RUSSEL & METIRIA: Party Vote Green!


Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


C c c Darren Rickard 2011




Sunday, October 30, 2011

The loop to Knowheresville

Ghost Train by ML87

Political running mates the Labour Party and Len Brown and his left wing branch of the Auckland council have colluded to fleece Aucklanders and the country at large of billions of dollars to expand 300 year old technology because they think it might work as a means of transport in the 21st century:

"If Labour was elected to government it would pay $1.2 billion or half of the cost of the proposed inner Auckland rail loop, Labour leader Phil Goff told around 100 supporters at an open air party meeting today.

The loop is projected to cost $2.4 billion.

Auckland City would have to pay half, and a Goff lead government would pay the other half by cancelling a "holiday highway" north of Auckland.

Goff said to become the world class city Auckland wants to become, it needs a world class transport system.

The current western and southern motorways were "bloody nightmares" he said.

Labour wanted to support Auckland Mayor Len Brown's plan for an inner city underground rail loop which would double the amount of trains the Britomart transport system could handle.

He attacked Transport Minister Steven Joyce, saying he was "mesmerised" by motorways and was planning to build a $1.7 billion motorway from Puhoi to Wellsford, which would link popluar beach destinations". Stuff.co.nz

The only problem with this proposal is that the 2.4 billion price tag is conservative, barely 2% of Aucklanders use trains and over the life of any proposed system the loop and its extension will lose billions more dollars that Aucklanders and Kiwis simply don't have.

Another major drawback is that motorists will be subsidizing rail through increased petrol taxes, road tolls and congestion charges.

Put simply it may have been a good idea 2 -300 years ago but technology as it is now means a rail loop and expanded rail network is expensive, uneconomic, polluting, inefficient and will not solve any current or future perceived transport problems.

Add to this that Labour want to ditch the long needed Northern motorway extension to help fund the government's share under their proposal and you clearly have a lose lose, situation.

The extension north will save lives, be a boon for trade between Northland and Auckland and the rest of the North Island and provide a much needed stimulus to a long-lagging Northland economy.

Labour want to ditch that in favour of a wet dream of train-tracks crisscrossing Auckland that will be a white elephant that ratepayers and taxpayers will be paying for dearly as long as it exists.

We need fiscal restraint at this time, not pork barrel politics and favours for mates.

Think Bigger


Darren Rickard 2011




John Key - Speech to National Party Campaign Opening

Rt Hon John Key, Prime Minister & Leader of the National Party

Speech to National Party Campaign Opening

Sky City Convention Centre, Auckland

Ladies and Gentlemen, fellow National Party members,

I'm proud to be launching National's campaign for the 2011 election.

It's an election where the stakes for New Zealand are high.

And you are an important part of it.

All of us have a role to play in this election, whether it's door knocking, putting up hoardings, posting flyers, driving people to the polls, or any of the hundreds of jobs that need to be done between now and November 26.

And we all have to be at the top of our game, because election campaigns are tough, and there is no room at all for complacency.

We need to be out there every day, selling our case.

For each of the next 27 days until the election, I will be out there talking about our plan for a brighter future and I want you to join me in doing that.

You can be assured that your MPs and candidates are working tirelessly to get our message across.

And what a great team we have.

Today I want to acknowledge their efforts and look forward to them joining me on the stage at the end of my speech.

In the end, this election is going to come down to two things.

First, it's about who can provide strong, stable leadership in difficult and uncertain times.

The world remains a turbulent place.

The images we see on our televisions from Europe and the United States remind us that strong political leadership is absolutely vital.

National has shown over the last three years that we can deliver strong and stable government in what have been very difficult times.

We've shown that we can work constructively with a number of other parties in Parliament to get things done for the benefit of New Zealand.

And the alternative is too awful to think about - a directionless, Labour-led government without a real plan to deal with these critical times.

Instead, all they have is a formula for more borrowing, more spending, more tax, and some vague notion of paying it off in the never-never. They would also impose big new costs on business.

That would be a recipe for disaster, just as New Zealand is starting to grow again and bedding in the economic recovery.

Which brings me to the second key factor in the election - who has the most credibility when it comes to the economy.

That's vitally important because when we talk about the economy we really mean our economy.

We are all a part of it.

Our economy keeps firms in business, people in their jobs, and families in their homes; it pays for medicines and health care, educates our kids, and pays our Super when we're older.

So whether a party has economic credibility or not has very real consequences for very real people.

National has a straightforward and comprehensive plan to build a more competitive, stronger economy.

We're balancing the books sooner by getting back to surplus in three years.

That means less debt and lower interest rates for households and businesses.

We're creating incentives for people to work hard, save and get ahead, through changes to tax and welfare.

And we're building better roads, broadband and other infrastructure so New Zealand businesses can grow.

Through these actions, we're creating a more competitive economy and backing Kiwis' ability to get out there and take on the world.

That means a more export-focused economy with more jobs for our kids.

And it means we can have better frontline services in health and education, stay strong on crime, and get on with the job of rebuilding Christchurch.

That's our plan, and what I can promise you this election is a continuation of that plan.

It's working, despite the difficult circumstances we've all endured over the last few years, including a recession in 2008, the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression, and the devastating series of earthquakes that hit Canterbury and destroyed whole parts of Christchurch.

182 people died in the earthquake on 22 February this year and our thoughts remain with the families and friends of all the victims.

I know it's been a difficult time for New Zealanders over the last few years.

We've had more than our fair share of adversity, and we've all been tested during this time.

But difficult times are when sound, stable and responsible government matters more than ever.

Faced with challenges, the National-led Government set about dealing with them in a measured and balanced way.

We supported New Zealanders through the recession, while at the same time putting in place measures to halt the rapid growth in government debt.

We undertook the biggest overhaul of the tax system in 25 years.

We cut personal tax, company tax, and taxes on savings; increased taxes on consumption and property investment; and closed a lot of loopholes and opportunities for tax avoidance.

We tightened our belt, and reprioritised billions of dollars towards front-line services in areas like health and education.

We put aside money to fund the government's share of Christchurch reconstruction.

And we took a number of steps to increase genuine national savings.

The results are already starting to show.

The economy has grown in eight of the nine quarters since our first Budget was delivered, despite the earthquakes and the lingering impact of the global recession.

Interest rates have fallen to 45 year lows.

Households this year will have a positive savings rate for the first time in nearly a decade.

Exporters have been getting very good prices for what they produce and our trade with Asia is booming.

The important thing is that ordinary New Zealanders have benefited from this recovery, even though it hasn't always been easy.

43,000 jobs were created last year.

Wages in the pocket have been rising faster than prices.

And the Government has been able to deliver better public services, with a focus on results.

Hospitals are performing 27,000 more elective procedures each year, with more frontline doctors and nurses. Emergency dept and cancer waiting times are down. And we're making visits to after-hours clinics free for children under six.

We've passed 18 new laws to clamp down on illegal behaviour. We've taken a much tougher line with boy racers, sentencing, parole and bail. We've clamped down on gangs and P, and we've given the Police more tools to do their job.

Crime is down in every region of the country.

We've invested heavily in infrastructure projects that will help deliver a brighter future, like new State highways, rolling out ultra-fast broadband, and upgrading the rail network.

National has delivered for New Zealanders in difficult times.

And what does the future hold?

You know what you'll be getting under National because it's largely set out in the Treasury's independent pre-election analysis - the PREFU.

This shows the budget deficit reducing significantly over the next two years before we run a $1.5 billion surplus in 2014/15.

After that we will be paying off debt, while other countries continue to borrow.

The economy is expected to grow at an average of three per cent a year over the next four years, with 170,000 more jobs than at the time of the Budget.

Unemployment will fall steadily to below 5 per cent.

Wages will continue to rise.

Interest rates will remain low.

And the government will continue to invest in high-quality public services.

That's pretty good, but I actually think we can do better than this.

There are huge opportunities out there for New Zealand.

We are a food-producing country in a world that is demanding more food.

Our trade is increasingly shifting towards Asia - the most vibrant economic region in the world.

A growing middle class in China, India and across the continent is tuning in to the goods and services New Zealand can supply.

I'm unashamedly positive for New Zealand. I think we've got a great future ahead of us.

But we need to get out and seize that future - it won't come delivered on a plate.

No-one owes New Zealand a living - we have to earn it.

That's why it's so important to create a more competitive economy.

An economy where businesses have the confidence to invest, expand, and take on new staff.

And an economy where we sell more of what the world wants to buy.

However, the world comes with challenges too.

The global environment is full of uncertainties and the Treasury has highlighted the European debt crisis as a major risk to the world economy.

That makes it even more important to have a strong, stable government at the helm.

So that is what National has to offer this election:

� strong, stable government, with a great team of Ministers and MPs

� sound, proven economic management that builds off our progress over the last three years

� and a positive vision for New Zealand , where the dividends of growth are seen in jobs, wages and better public services.

The alternative is Labour.

Where do I start?

Labour is a party without a plan.

Instead, they have a collection of election gimmicks and slogans, like GST off bananas, all of which would come with a hefty price tag.

Together these would create a $16 billion hole in the government's accounts over the next 4 years alone - and far more over the longer term - which would have to be funded through borrowing.

Labour knows that.

So they have suddenly decided that every New Zealander can work another two years longer, to pay for some of their spending spree.

Even then, their numbers are a long way from adding up, because their retirement changes don't start having a significant effect for at least 15 years.

Where does that leave us?

Labour would simply borrow more, spend more, tax more, and impose more costs on every business in the country.

And now they now want to push back everyone's well-earned retirement.

Why would you vote for that?

Why would you vote for a party that thinks the answer to a global debt crisis is more debt?

It just doesn't make sense.

But it's certainly true to form.

When Labour was last in government they increased their spending by 50 per cent in only five years.

In Opposition, they have opposed every piece of spending restraint we've introduced.

Yes, every one.

And now their election promises consist of - you guessed it - more spending.

And when it comes to loading costs onto business, they are in a league of their own.

A big increase in the minimum wage, a compulsory KiwiSaver policy that hugely ramps up costs to employers, a new capital gains tax on all businesses, a more expensive ETS, an irrigation tax on farmers, more transport taxes, and a1970s industrial relations policy - all of these would add up to big cost increases for the 500,000 businesses in New Zealand.

That's seven big, extra costs on business.

Businesses, both big and small, have only a few ways to meet these sorts of costs - reduce wages, cut jobs, increase prices or simply shut up shop altogether.

This is not the future I want for my kids - and I know you don't want it either.

Let's face it - Labour just does not understand how businesses work.

I know, and you know, that the only way people get jobs, and wage rises, is when someone is prepared to put money and time into their business, seek out new opportunities and grow.

Through the promises it's made, Labour is telling those people not to bother.

Well I am far more optimistic than Mr Goff.

I back New Zealanders to get ahead.

But we have to give them the right environment to operate in, and a platform from which they can compete with the best in the world.

That only happens when we think carefully about things like taxes, and about regulations, and about the overall flexibility of the economy.

And it only happens when we keep debt low, invest in modern infrastructure and encourage savings.

That last point is what I want to talk more about this afternoon - keeping debt low, investing in modern infrastructure, and encouraging savings.

Because that's precisely what our extension of the mixed-ownership model is all about.

As I go around New Zealand and talk to people, I find they increasingly understand what we're planning to do with the mixed-ownership model.

They understand that we already have a living, breathing example of mixed ownership in Air New Zealand, which has been operating under this model for almost a decade.

They understand that the government will retain a majority stake in Meridian, Mighty River, Genesis and Solid Energy, so we'll never lose control.

They know these companies provide an opportunity for New Zealand savers who are looking for somewhere to put their savings, and not in housing or finance companies.

And they understand that by extending the mixed-ownership model to these companies, the Government will free up $5 to $7 billion for reinvesting in new and valuable assets, without having to borrow.

Today I am announcing how this reinvestment will happen.

If re-elected, National will put the proceeds of mixed ownership - which, as I said, will be between $5 and $7 billion - into a new Fund, called the Future Investment Fund.

The Future Investment Fund will be used to buy new assets on behalf of New Zealanders, and to upgrade and modernise our existing assets.

The new projects I am talking about here are things like major hospital redevelopments, new schools, and transport projects.

They will result in assets that are long-lived, are here in New Zealand, and are owned by the Crown on behalf of all taxpayers.

We will set a high bar for projects to be funded out of the Future Investment Fund and the case for these projects will have to stack up.

They will have to deliver substantial social or economic dividends for New Zealanders.

Decisions on spending from the Fund will be made on a case-by-case basis, by ministers, as part of the normal Budget process.

We intend the Fund to run for at least five Budgets, but this of course depends on how much the mixed ownership model raises. The higher the proceeds, the more new investment we can pay for without having to borrow.

We will be very transparent about the proceeds that go into the Future Investment Fund and very transparent about what assets are being paid for out of the Fund.

In this way, the public can be assured that the proceeds of mixed ownership are not being lost.

Far from it - the money we raise from mixed ownership will be used, in its entirety, to pay for valuable new assets that will benefit New Zealanders for many years to come.

And because we will have the money already there in a Fund, we don't need to go out and borrow that money from overseas lenders, increase our debt, and pay higher interest payments offshore.

Today I am also announcing the first project to come out of the Future Investment Fund.

The first priority for the Fund is education.

We are putting aside $1 billion of the Fund, over the next five years, to modernise and transform New Zealand schools.

That's because the environment in which teachers teach, and kids learn, is hugely important.

But kids across New Zealand go to schools that are as different as chalk and cheese.

Some kids go to very modern, new schools.

I've been lucky enough to visit some of these schools, like Albany Junior and Senior High Schools in my own electorate.

These schools don't look anything like the ones most of us went to.

A time-traveller from the 1960s wouldn't even recognise them as schools.

For a start, they are not made up of rectangular, one-teacher, single-class classrooms, with 25 desks all in lines and a blackboard - or whiteboard - at the front.

They are built in a very modern way, to support modern teaching methods and modern technology.

Typically, they are built around what are called 'flexible teaching spaces'.

These are open plan areas with breakout rooms coming off them. The whole area can easily be reconfigured and used in a variety of ways.

This sort of space gives teachers the flexibility to teach small groups of students, or larger groups sharing resources with multiple teachers.

And they are designed to enable teachers and students to make far better use of technology than is possible anywhere else.

Other kids go to more traditional schools that nevertheless have built new teaching areas.

But most kids go to schools that were built during the post-war baby boom, or even before that. In fact 60 per cent of New Zealand schools are over 50 years old.

They weren't designed for new technology, quite obviously, and they weren't designed to support modern teaching methods.

What is more, quite a number of school buildings are either earthquake risks or are leaky.

The point here is that kids will struggle to learn in a poor environment.

So our goal is to ensure that as much as possible, all schools, whatever their age, can provide the same learning opportunities as new schools.

That will be a long-term project, stretching out 10 years and beyond.

And it will require a considerable investment.

As things stand now, the existing money for school building projects will be needed simply to maintain the existing school network and to help address health and safety issues like earthquake proofing and leaky buildings.

And to do anything more would require borrowing.

So we are going to take $1 billion from the Future Investment Fund and put it towards accelerating our "21st Century Schools" building programme.

This programme will cover the next five years and involves:

� building new, modern schools

� rejuvenating existing schools on the same site

� building new, modern teaching areas in existing schools

� and wiring up many more schools with fibre, to take advantage of ultra-fast broadband.

All these new schools and all these new teaching areas will be built as modern learning environments and incorporate flexible teaching spaces.

They will all be set up to accommodate the latest technology.

And because we'll be relieving a lot of pressure from the rest of the school building budget, there will be more resources available for smaller rebuilding and redesign projects, which again will involve modern designs and modern technology.

So the $1 billion we are contributing from the Fund is a very big investment in schools and therefore in the future of our kids.

It will allow us to increase the total amount spent on school building projects each year by more than 50 per cent.

That level of investment would not be possible without the mixed ownership model.

Our 21st Century school building programme is also bolstered by the Government's major investment in ultra-fast broadband.

All schools will be connected to ultra-fast broadband over the next five years.

At the same time, we're wiring up the inside of schools with fibre so they can connect with the new broadband network.

And the next step is to develop a dedicated on-line network for all New Zealand schools.

I'm pleased to announce that the Government has agreed to fund the development of this network. It will be called the Network for Learning and it will go live in 2013.

Schools will be able to access this network once they are wired up for ultra-fast broadband.

Our Network for Learning will enable schools to access learning resources on line, connect with other schools across the country and around the world, and allow teaching to be delivered at a distance, for example to students in rural schools.

It will ensure that teaching and learning in New Zealand reflects modern educational methods and makes the most of new technology.

With over 2,500 schools and more than 800,000 users, it will be the biggest network of its kind in the country.

Taken together, our 21st Century building programme, ultra-fast broadband, and the new Network for Learning, will give our kids learning opportunities that are second to none in the world.

Ladies and Gentlemen, fellow National Party members:

Make no mistake - New Zealanders have a very clear choice this election.

They can choose to go forward with a strong, stable National-led government and build on the last three years.

A National government that stands for a prosperous, safe and ambitious New Zealand, where all Kiwis have the opportunities to get ahead under their own steam, no matter where they are born or what their parents do.

Or they can stop, and then head backwards, with a negative Labour Party that wants to borrow more, spend more, tax more, put more costs on business, and push back everyone's well-earned retirement.

Personally, I think New Zealanders are aspirational for their future.

That's why I'm asking them to give their party vote to National on November 26.

Let's get out there and win that election.


* Please note I would have posted the labour opening speech but there isn't going to be one.


Think Bigger


Darren Rickard 2011