Hugh Fletcher: Silver spoon no recipe for success

In an interview with Kim Hill on National Radio a few weeks back Fletcher Building Ltd [FBU.NZ] former CEO Hugh Fletcher gives his views on the history of the business and his time there.

Fletcher followed in the footsteps of his father and grandfather at what was then Fletcher Challenge. He remains a director of Fletcher Building to this day.

He is currently on the board of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand in 2002 and chairs the board of directors of IAG New Zealand and is a director at Vector Ltd [VCT.NZ], and a board member of Insurance Australia Group.

The interesting part of the interview is the glossing over by Hugh of his failure as CEO in the 1980s-1990s. Under his reign the company limped towards oblivion in the 1990s as failed expansion attempts led to the breakup of the company into 3 different divisions in 2000.

He made many enemies along the way, notably Sir Ron Trotter, Sir Ron Brierly and Dr Rod Deanne, a former director at Fletcher Challenge and failed former CEO of Telecom NZ [TEL.NZ].

A very interesting view from Mr Fletcher on the history of what is now Fletcher Building and it is ironic that the company went back to its roots in the building industry after its failure under the grandson of the founder.

It just goes to show, leaders and business are not born but made from hard work and ability and often separated from parentage.


Disc: I own a small FBU holding in the Share Investor Portfolio


Fletcher Building @ Share Investor

Long VS Short: Fletcher Building Ltd
Fletcher Building's Commercial arm keeps their head above the tunnel
Sweetheart deal for Fletcher Building's Friends
Fletcher House built on hard times
Fletcher Building down tools in the short term
Why did you buy that stock? [Fletcher Building Ltd]
A solid foundation for the future
Fletcher Building raises profit through canny management
Fletcher's got game

Discuss Fletcher Building @ Share Investor Forum - Register free

From Fishpond.co.nz

The story of his family and their company is told in Fletchers: a Centennial History of Fletcher Building by Paul Goldsmith




c Share Investor 2009

Hanover, Allied Farmers deal more of the same

So the Hanover Finance "rescue" package proposed by Allied Farmers has been given the big tick in an "independent report" by Grant Samuels . Well GS does reports on a number of companies and favour in its reports usually falls on the side of the party paying the cheque, so we can largely discount the GS report.

This is what it basically said though:

The Allied Farmers proposal is superior to the status quo and a high risk of receivership for Hanover Finance investors, according to Grant Samuel. NZ Herald

I happen to have an alternative view.

As I said back in November 2009 when Hanover proposed their moratorium, the best thing to do would have been to vote to wind the company up and get what you could get.

Hanover investors instead voted to give Eric Watson and his fellow fraudsters another chance and of course we now know that has blown up in investors faces just one year latter.

Investors in Hanover and United Finance, who Allied are also interested in buying, have the choice again to this time give directors at Allied a chance to get some money back on assets that are not likely to improve in value any time soon, in a property market that is uncertain at best or to simply bury their pride and vote to wind up the companies and get the best they can get at today's market rate.

I bet you Mark Hotchin's $35 million house in Paratei Drive that taking the money now rather than crossing your fingers for a recovery under future management will be the best bet.

Related Share Investor reading

Hanover's "White Knights" are really daylight robbers
Hanover collapse: It was just a matter of time
Money Managers Saga: 3 Story wrap
Money Managers gives First Step investors the middle finger
Greed is bad: Geneva Finance Folds
Financial 101: Learn before you leap
Kevin's Blog

Related Amazon Reading


Resisting Corporate Corruption: Lessons in Practical Ethics from the Enron Wreckage (Conflicts and Trends in Business Ethics) by Stephen V. Arbogast
Buy new: $64.00 / Used from: $21.50
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2009

Warehouse strike opportunity to buy

News earlier this week that less than a third of The Warehouse Group [WHS.NZ] workers will go on strike because they see the company as the big bad Christmas Grinch is bad short term for the company because it comes at a time of year when the bulk of their sales and profit is made but it is nonetheless another opportunity for people like myself to load up on the Christmas bargain that Warehouse shares could become if the industrial dispute drags on.

"Project Invigorate" the Warehouse' initiative to streamline and save costs includes the ability for management to direct workers into more flexible hours and conditions. Approximately 7500 staff work at the big red sheds and the bulk of the staff, who are not unionised, agree with management and so don't have a problem.

As I said above the short term prognosis if a strike is called and it drags on means that sales and profit for the next reporting period will be down but in the long term savings from increased labour flexibility along with logistics changes and inventory tweaks will mean bigger profits and more dividends for owners like myself and clearly that aint a bad thing.

The company is getting bad press in the mainstream media and they are largely behind the union from what I have been reading but below is typical of some of the coverage:

"All the staff were happy in their job. The managers used to be more flexible with the hours, they understood our personal circumstances, they used to work around our lives instead of us trying to work around the company's life. NZ Herald

I mean hang on a sec, don't you realise your boss is employing you ! at a time when economic circumstances are tough.

While I am for treating workers well, one has to realise that the company is there to make money and while you are an important part of that the company deserves the right to do what it sees fit to run their business.

The majority of Warehouse employees agree with management and only a handful of workers whipped up by a socialist union are pissing in the wind.

Time for them to go elsewhere get another job and let us run the company how we see fit.

With every cloud though there is a silver lining. I will be poised to buy if the share price drops.

Thanks to the Union for that.

Warehouse shares dropped 10c yesterday on the news and my interest will be piqued at around the $3.75 mark.




The Warehouse Group @ Share Investor

Long Term Play: The Warehouse Group
Share Investor Short: Warehouse Group yield worth a look
Woolworths supermarket consolidation an indicator of a move on the Warehouse?
Stock of the Week: The Warehouse Group
Warehouse 2009 interim profit a key economic indicator
When will The Warehouse bidders make their move?
Long vs Short: The Warehouse Group
Warehouse bidders ready to lay money down
The Warehouse set to cut lose "extra" impediment
The Warehouse sale could hinge on "Extra" decision
The case for The Warehouse without a buyer
Foodstuffs take their foot off the gas
Woolworths seek leave to appeal to Supreme Court
Warehouse appeal decision imminent
Warehouse decision a loser for all
Warehouse Court of appeal decision in Commerce Commission's favour
MARKETWATCH: The Warehouse
The Warehouse takeover saga continues
Why did you buy that stock? [The Warehouse]
History of Warehouse takeover players suggest a long winding road
Court of Appeal delays Warehouse bid
The Warehouse set for turbulent 2008
The Warehouse Court of Appeal case lay in "Extras" hands
WHS Court of Appeal case could be dismissed next week
Commerce Commission impacts on the Warehouse bottom line
The Warehouse in play
Outcomes of Commerce Commission decision
The fight for control begins soon


Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Forum - Register free

From Fishpond.co.nz



NEW! "Letters to Aston: Lessons Learned from a Lifetime of Investing" by Martin Hawes


c Share Investor 2009

Mike Pero and Air New Zealand: Capitalism vs Socialism

The fuss made by Air New Zealand [AIR.NZ] over Mike Pero's generous offer last week to provide a plane for families of victims of the 1979 Mt Erebus crash to visit the crash site has come to a head today when Air New Zealand seems to have relented because of embarrassment over a pitiful 6 individuals allowed to go to the site for the 30th anniversary of the crash last week.

The pilot of the fateful Air New Zealand DC10 that killed 257 people was blamed by Air New Zealand management at the time for the crash but evidence was clear that the fault lay first and foremost at Air NZ's feet and that management lied and covered up to rescue the company reputation.

It seems Rob Fyfe and his fellow board members have learned little over the years.

The company that he runs, which is majority owned and financially supported by Kiwi taxpayers has had a history under Fyfe's ownership of socialistic tendencies. That is, its CEO Fyfe has muttered that his company needs more taxpayer moola to run it, using fake science to attack competitors and making public comments that really shouldn't be made by a CEO in a publicly listed company.

Air New Zealand is to all intents a government department and it is run that way.

You can see that in its response to Mike Pero's offer to get a charter plane up to Erebus. Pero made the offer, Air NZ was "offended" by it, then changed its mind and now wants to do it itself, with taxpayer money - pure politics in operation and nothing else.

The failure by Fyfe at the top to be proactive and supply a plane for as many family members of victims who wanted to go is the real story.

Of course the fact that Jim Collins, the pilot of the 1979 flight, hasn't been publicly vindicated is the biggest shame of all and politics is again to blame for that.

As taxpayers, we are all Air NZ shareholders and we should all be angry about that. Those that have made a choice to buy Air NZ shares on the NZX should be seriously looking elsewhere to make money - this company aint going anywhere good in the long-term.

I salute you Mike for standing up to the mediocrity of socialism and using your fine capitalistic skills to try and make a difference for "victims" of the Erebus disaster.

Lets hope you go ahead with the flight. I know which flight I would rather be on.


AIR @ Share Investor

Queenstown Airport: Loud Voices & Loyalty
Long Term View: Air New Zealand Ltd
John Palmer Tipples on the Shareholder
Mike Pero and Air New Zealand: Capitalism vs Socialism
Rob Fyfe's "Environmental Extremism"
Reality Needs to Bite
Air New Zealand wants another taxpayer bailout

Discuss this stock at Share Investor Forum - Register free
Download AIR Company Reports

Security Analysis: Sixth Edition, Foreword by Warren Buffett (Security Analysis Prior Editions) by Benjamin Graham Buy new: $41.77 / Used from: $33.50 Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2009