Tuesday, September 9, 2008

BREAKING NEWS: Horse trainer backs Glenn's version in donations row

Owen Glenn fronted the Privileges Committee to defend his reputation over the NZ First donations scandal. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Owen Glenn fronted the Privileges Committee to defend his reputation over the NZ First donations scandal. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Updated 4:06PM Tuesday September 09, 2008
By Patrick Gower and Claire Trevett

Melbourne Cup winning horse trainer Paul Moroney has backed up Owen Glenn's version of events in the New Zealand First donations row.

Mr Moroney said in an affidavit to Parliament's Privileges Committee today that he was at a lunch at Karaka in 2006 at which Winston Peters thanked Mr Glenn for his help.

continued at NZ Herald

Hell hath no fury like a donor scorned

The biggest donor to the Labour Party, Owen Glenn, will give evidence to clear his name today when he goes into a Privileges Committee hearing in relation to the $100,000 donation he gave to Winston Peters and NZ First.


He has been travelling for near two days, has been taken away from his business at hand and he must be absolutely pissed-with Winston Peters and the Labour Party.

Peters and Labour have been royally slagging off Glenn's reputation with an orchestrated smear campaign in order to discredit his character and reputation. 

Accusations of Glenn's mental capability, memory and stability have been spread by Trevor Mallard, the bully boy of the Labour Party.

Glenn has been a donor to several causes in New Zealand, to the tune of multi millions of dollars, including the Labour Party but Clark or any other member of her party will not even meet with him.

He now clearly regrets supporting Labour and Winston Peter's party and will avenge his good name this afternoon.

c Political Animal 2008



Blood Brother unwilling to give in Glenn donation saga

D day has come for Winston Peters and the details over his donation from Owen Glenn, made to him or his party or his lawyer-the story is different whoever you talk to and what time of day it is.


The Privileges Committee sits this afternoon where Owen Glenn will give his version of events, which haven't differed in all his accounts.

Glenn has said he is there to "clear his name" whatever the consequences for the players and I don't blame him for his bluntness. He is a busy man.

The missing link in all of this though appears to be Peter's lawyer Brian Henry, Peter's "blood brother".

Henry is "overseas" and it is unclear as to whether he will be giving evidence in Peters defence tomorrow when the Privileges Committee sits again with Winnie giving his newest version of events, again.

I cant understand why a person that is supposedly at the centre of this whole scandal-Peters and Henry contend it was Henry that was the bag man, while Glenn has given affidavits that it was Peters-and a self confessed "blood brother" of Peters wouldn't be there in Winnies hour of need.

I'm guessing he isn't because his testimony would be deleterious to Peters than it already has been.

c Political Animal 2008


US TREASURY PRESS RELEASE: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Share Investor Forum-Discuss this topic

The following information is a press release from the US treasury less than 30 minutes ago.


It defines effectively that the US Government(taxpayer) is taking control of Fannie and Freddie.

It means that half of all US mortgages are now State managed and backed.

It also means that the private housing market in the US has collapsed-the taxpayer bailing out the company doesn't mean it hasn't, whatever US Government officials are telling Americans, and the rest of the world for that matter.

It is important that investors re-assess their investments at this juncture and structure them according to the risk and current economic climate in view of this latest news.

WASHINGTON (Sun Sep 7, 2008 12:57pm EDT) The following is the full text of a statement released on Sunday by Treasury Henry Paulson on mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Good morning. I'm joined here by Jim Lockhart, Director of the new independent regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency,

FHFA. In July, Congress granted the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and FHFA new authorities with respect to the GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Since that time, we have closely monitored financial market and business conditions and have analyzed in great detail the current financial condition of the GSEs including the ability of the GSEs to weather a variety of market conditions going forward. As a result of this work, we have determined that it is necessary to take action.

Since this difficult period for the GSEs began, I have clearly stated three critical objectives: providing stability to financial markets, supporting the availability of mortgage finance, and protecting taxpayers both by minimizing the near term costs to the taxpayer and by setting policymakers on a course to resolve the systemic risk created by the inherent conflict in the GSE structure. Based on what we have learned about these institutions over the last four weeks including what we learned about their capital requirements and given the condition of financial markets today, I concluded that it would not have been in the best interest of the taxpayers for Treasury to simply make an equity investment in these enterprises in their current form.

The four steps we are announcing today are the result of detailed and thorough collaboration between FHFA, the U.S. Treasury, and the Federal Reserve. We examined all options available, and determined that this comprehensive and complementary set of actions best meets our three objectives of market stability, mortgage availability and taxpayer protection. Throughout this process we have been in close communication with the GSEs themselves. I have also consulted with Members of Congress from both parties and I appreciate their support as FHFA, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have moved to address this difficult issue.

Before I turn to Jim to discuss the action he is taking today, let me make clear that these two institutions are unique. They operate solely in the mortgage market and are therefore more exposed than other financial institutions to the housing correction. Their statutory capital requirements are thin and poorly defined as compared to other institutions. Nothing about our actions today in any way reflects a changed view of the housing correction or of the strength of other U.S. financial institutions. I support the Director's decision as necessary and appropriate and had advised him that conservatorship was the only form in which I would commit taxpayer money to the GSEs. I appreciate the productive cooperation we have received from the boards and the management of both GSEs. I attribute the need for today's action primarily to the inherent conflict and flawed business model embedded in the GSE structure, and to the ongoing housing correction.

GSE managements and their Boards are responsible for neither. New CEOs supported by new non-executive Chairmen have taken over management of the enterprises, and we hope and expect that the vast majority of key professionals will remain in their jobs. I am particularly pleased that the departing CEOs, Dan Mudd and Dick Syron, have agreed to stay on for a period to help with the transition. I have long said that the housing correction poses the biggest risk to our economy. It is a drag on our economic growth, and at the heart of the turmoil and stress for our financial markets and financial institutions. Our economy and our markets will not recover until the bulk of this housing correction is behind us. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are critical to turning the corner on housing.

Therefore, the primary mission of these enterprises now will be to proactively work to increase the availability of mortgage finance, including by examining the guaranty fee structure with an eye toward mortgage affordability. To promote stability in the secondary mortgage market and lower the cost of funding, the GSEs will modestly increase their MBS portfolios through the end of 2009. Then, to address systemic risk, in 2010 their portfolios will begin to be gradually reduced at the rate of 10 percent per year, largely through natural run off, eventually stabilizing at a lower, less risky size. Treasury has taken three additional steps to complement FHFA's decision to place both enterprises in conservatorship. First, Treasury and FHFA have established Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements, contractual agreements between the Treasury and the conserved entities.

Under these agreements, Treasury will ensure that each company maintains a positive net worth. These agreements support market stability by providing additional security and clarity to GSE debt holders senior and subordinated and support mortgage availability by providing additional confidence to investors in GSE mortgage backed securities. This commitment will eliminate any mandatory triggering of receivership and will ensure that the conserved entities have the ability to fulfill their financial obligations. It is more efficient than a one-time equity injection, because it will be used only as needed and on terms that Treasury has set. With this agreement, Treasury receives senior preferred equity shares and warrants that protect taxpayers. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, common and preferred shareholders bear losses ahead of the new government senior preferred shares.


Related Share Investor Reading

Not so sweet Fannie Mae
Global credit squeeze: There is no free lunch
Lenders must come clean over losses to restore faith in credit markets

Global Market meltdown: What is Warren Buffett doing?
Credit crunch a blessing in disguise
Market meltdown: I can smell the fear from here

Mr Market gets his groove on
What happened to risk?
State backed Sub Prime mortgages in New Zealand
The global economy looks bad now, but wait theres more
NZ Sharemarket set for a Winter and Summer of discontent


c Share Investor 2008