Saturday, April 25, 2009

Bank Guarantees: The Return of Bryce

I mentioned to one of my email correspondents that I would return in a few months to see my bank manager, "Bryce" at the ASB Bank in Albany after having seen him first late one Thursday at the end of February to re-negotiate the terms of our rather large mortgage.

I did, sort of.

This time Bryce was unwilling to see me after my hard workday so we discussed the matter over the mobile.

I would have preferred to see him in person but he insisted I couldn't.

I pointed out to him, again, that the New Zealand taxpayer was guaranteeing banks in New Zealand so they could borrow cheaper money from abroad to lend to us.

Bryce pointed out to me that it wasn't the taxpayer that was going guarantor,it was in fact the Government.

After pointing Bryce to the error of his ways over the fact that Government and the taxpayer were one and the same (Bryce still doesn't think they are) I thought out loud that wasn't it funny that as a borrower from his bank, the ASB, that I was now a guarantor for my loan but also as a taxpayer I was going guarantor for his bank to borrow the same money to lend back to me.

This seem to confuse Bryce but it was very clear to me.

I added what I said at our Thursday evening meeting in February, that we are clearly living in exceptional economic times, something Bryce agreed with during the mere half dozen times I repeated that same mantra.

Bryce said I would be breaking my contract with the bank if we re-negotiated without an outrageous bank fee and I agreed with Bryce at that stage but had to point out that the terms of our contract had clearly changed because I was now going guarantor for both his and my borrowing, hence making it cheaper for Goldstein and his fat American buddy to borrow money in the first place.

We both became dizzy as I reiterate the above several times (I don't let go once I sink my teeth in) to no effect at all.

The bank will not negotiate at all, that is all he had to say from the get-go

Before we both left the conversation, Bryce pointed out that the bank had been around for 100 and something years and was "very safe" immaterial of any taxpayer/Government guarantees and then I asked him why then did the bank sign up to the guarantee and he kindly pointed out because that is what the other banks were doing and it wouldn't "be fair" to the ASB if they didn't join the party.

Fair... mmm, yes but, why?...

A asked whether the bank had these sort of guarantees during the 1930s, he didn't know, I left none the wiser and Bryce left probably wishing he hadn't returned my call.

I don't think Bryce is going to take another call from me.

I will however have another go in a few more months.



More Banking Madness @ Shareinvestor

Westpac: I'm Thinking of Returning





c Share Investor 2009



Friday, April 24, 2009

535 Ex Trans Rail Holders due $10 million

I hate to see people lose money and not get money that is due to them.

The Securities Commission is actually earning its money in this case - I knew they were good for something!

Some 535 shareholders are still eligible for compensation from settlement of the Tranz Rail insider trading case. The names of these shareholders are listed on the Commission's website at www.seccom.govt.nz. They are invited to contact the Commission by 24 July 2009 for information about how to claim their compensation. Entitled shareholders will need to verify their identity and shareholding details. Full Press Release

The claim relates to the Fay Richwhite Trans Rail insider trading case where the aforementioned made a $27 million payment to the Securities Commission, without admitting guilt, to insider trading.

The case was unable to be proven by the Commission but there is clear evidence of the insider trading and most of us are aware of information that points to Messrs Richwhite's guilt.

The claim for those 535 shareholders with money outstanding is time limited, so get off your butt and contact the Securities Commisssion before the State gets it.

Just as an aside, funny that last year the same company was bought on behalf of the taxpayer under similar fraudulent circumstances by one Michael Cullen.

I wonder if the SEC COM will be chasing Mr Cullen?

Related Links

Securities Commission - Make your claim here
List of eligible shareholders

Recent Share Investor Reading


Related Amazon Reading

The Stock Market Mercenary
The Stock Market Mercenary by Daniel L. James
Buy new: $24.95 / Used from: $18.86
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2009

Political Animal backing Russel Norman in Mt Albert Bye--Election

In the battle for Helen Clark's old seat Mt Albert there are many possible candidates lining up to keep that seat warm.

Melissa Leigh from the National Party is the clear front runner in this previous Labour only held electorate and is likely to win the seat.

Labour is still undecided on their candidate, like they are with their tax policy and just about every policy they have a view on.

It is uncertain what every other political party is doing for this seat when the bye-election is due in June of this year.

All except the Green Party.

They are putting up Russel Norman, the current "co-leader" of the Green Party.

A man of obvious credentials and also possessing a wardrobe stocked with thick woolly jumpers.

Politcal Animal backs Mr Norman in his quest for the Mt Albert seat and urges as many Mt Albert folk to vote for him as can be relied upon to do so in that area.

We always back the underdog here at Political Animal and clearly Mr Norman fits that bill.

Get out and vote on election day, the environment will be the winner on the day.

Related Amazon Reading

Progressivism and the World of Reform: New Zealand and the Origins of the American Welfare StateProgressivism and the World of Reform: New Zealand and the Origins of the American Welfare State by Peter J. Coleman 
Buy new: $29.95 / Used from: $24.79
Usually ships in 2 to 3 weeks

c Political Animal 2009

Bookmark and Share

Sky City CEO doubles down

The rationale for Sky City Entertainment [SKC.NZ] loading up the balance sheet with extra shares and as a consequence around NZ$230 million of cash isn't completely clear to me over the last few days since SKC were put on a trading halt on Tuesday 21.

My confusion is compounded by the fact that the $230 million raised appeared to be for two different reasons, for purchase opportunities and "strengthening the balance sheet" in uncertain times but if a purchase is made how does that strengthen the balance sheet? especially if it involves drawing down on the half a billion in unused credit facilities that Sky City currently has.

I am going try to unwind my confusion and explain my point of view on this subject in the following column.

This from a story in Stuff.co.nz might give you an indication on where I might be heading:

But despite its $916 million of debt, SkyCity plans to put the money it raises in a bank deposit account, at least for now.

Chief executive Nigel Morrison said that was because SkyCity "owes no bankers anything."

Just one question though, if you have access to cash in the bank and a rather large debt hanging around your neck don't you pay some of it down?

Well, Nige did say when posted to his position as CEO last year that one of his main tasks would be to be prudent with shareholder funds:

"Our shareholders have made it clear to us that they want us to focus on maximising the performance of the assets we operate. This is what we will be doing. as we have said previously, we expect to achieve this within an 18-month time frame. We will retain tight control over capital and not expend capital unless we are very confident of healthy returns for shareholders".

The emphasis on unnecessary capital spending in addition to paying down debt has been made several times since then and one could be forgiven for thinking that this task was going to be paramount to everything else until performance at the company was "maximised".

That certainly of direction needed to be achieved as the company has floundered directionless over the last 5 years under the previous CEO Evan Davies.

Now of course Morrison does have to be fleet footed and have the ability to change tack as economic circumstances change but the clear direction that he outlined last year has forked out into another, possibly expensive direction:

"For anybody to suggest that the money it just going to sit on deposit in a bank account earning 3 per cent for three years, that's ludicrous," he said. "It's a position of strength. We're not beholden to any financier or any bank." Morrison said it also gave the company funding for acquisitions should opportunities arise. Full Story

Now I am not about to suggest that Morrison is going to plunder more shareholder money on overpriced assets as Evan Davies did, as his reputation for being a canny operator who rejuvenates casinos is well known but I get a little edgy when he is asking shareholders to put their hands in their pockets to buy more casino assets, even if they are as he said, now going for knocked down prices.

It is the move away from the previous stated 18 month aim of being financially prudent and rejigging the business that has me worried and to then focus on other plans that involve large capital expenditures would be a more realistic goal, especially as those casino assets he may now be talking about could be alot cheaper in 6 months time.

It seems to me that he may already have a target casino in mind.

Time to cross your fingers if you are a shareholder. I am.



Sky City @ Share Investor

Sky City Entertainment 2009 Interim Profit Review

Sky City Entertainment 2009 Interim Result Preamble
2008 Sky City profit analysis
Sky City Entertainment 2008 Full Year profit results , NZX release, 2008 full year presentation, result briefing webcast, financial statements
Sky City 2008 profit preamble
Sky City outlines a clear future plan
As recession bites Sky City bites back
Sky City Assets: Buy, sell and hold
Why did you buy that stock? [Sky City Entertainment]
Sky City Share Volumes set tongues wagging
Sky City half year exceptional on cost cutting
NZX Press release: Sky City profit to HY end Dec 2007
Sky City Cinemas no Blockbuster
Sky City Entertainment share price drop
New Broom set to sweep
Sky City Management: Blind, deaf and numb
Sky City sale could be off
Opposition to takeover
Premium for control
Sky City receives takeover bid
Sky City Casino Full Year Profit to June 30 2007
Setting the record straight
Sky City CEO resigns
Sky City Casino: Under performing
Sky City Casino 2007 HY Profit(analysis)
Sky City Casino 2007 HY Profit

Discuss this topic @ Shareinvestor.net.nz

Related Links

Sky City Financial Data
Related Amazon Reading

Double or Nothing: How Two Friends Risked It All to Buy One of Las Vegas' Legendary Casinos

Double or Nothing: How Two Friends Risked It All to Buy One of Las Vegas' Legendary Casinos by Tom Breitling
Buy new: $17.72 / Used from: $1.40
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2009