Showing posts with label government regulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government regulation. Show all posts

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Whingers, Losers, Xenophobes and Private Property

The fuss made by some over the possible sale of dairy assets to a Chinese Government owned company just shows how little some New Zealanders know about business, investing, commerce in general, how it all works and how it provides income for the country as a whole.

There is little negative about the prospect of the Chinese or any other foreign organization or business owning dairy assets or any other asset domiciled in New Zealand.

Money will flow into the coffers of the sellers and then that gets reinvested into future business, in this case lenders will receive the funds and this will give them the opportunity of lending that money out again.

These farms and assets bought in general will need New Zealanders to look after them, work within them and manage them. The company will pay tax, so will individuals. GST and other taxes will provide State income as well if you are worried at all by that.

The alternative to not selling to the Chinese or any other high bidder for an asset would be to seriously devalue that asset, any asset in its class and assets in general in this country. A case in point was Michael Cullen's last minute veto of the sale of Auckland International Airport [AIA.NZ] to the Canadian Pension fund in 2008. That particular asset is now worth roughly half the offer the Canadians made for it and the losers were the shareholders who forgo more than NZ$1.5 billion in profits that could have been reinvested in other stock exchange businesses.

Seriously, would you sell to an alternative lower offer to a high bidder for your car simply because you didn't like the genetic origins of that buyer?

It sounds dumb when you put it that way doesn't it?

Those that say the dairy industry is a "strategic" one and shouldn't go offshore or that the "Government" should buy these "strategic assets" miss the point entirely. These businesses are privately owned and as such Governments shouldn't have any say in such business transactions.

To allow this sort of intervention merely puts business in the hands of politicians and the political mood of the day and is no way to run a business let alone a country. It slow downs commerce, interferes with economic growth and provides an uncertainty for business when certainty is essential to a smooth running business and growing economy.

Free trade is also stifled by this head up the backside approach to business. New Zealand business has investment overseas and specifically in farms the world over. NZ Farming Systems Uruguay [NZS.NZ] owns many dairy farms in South America and in turn its majority owner, PPG Wrightson Ltd [PGW.NZ] has a cornerstone Chinese owner.

Any entertainment of such interference from State sanctioned knuckle draggers, who know little about successful business, simply devalues the value of private property rights and the right of the owner of an asset to do what he sees fit to do with it.

Private property rights and the upholding of them, ironically by the State, are one of the most important parts of a smooth running democratic society and it is essential that these rights are upheld at every available opportunity.

The refusal to allow dairy farms, other dairy assets and assets in general to be sold to the Chinese or anyone else for that matter is merely a symptom of xenophobia, the wish to maintain monopolies, in the case of Fonterra, and small mindedness of some New Zealanders who need to either read more widely ( or perhaps read at all) and do a little overseas travel to countries whose main inhabitants have a different skin colour to them.

Shame on you if you think this way.

Recent Share Investor Reading

Recommended Amazon Reading

The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A     Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition)
The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) by Benjamin Graham
Buy new: $14.95 / Used from: $7.50
Usually ships in 24 hours

Buy The Intelligent Investor & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


c Share Investor 2010

Friday, July 24, 2009

Auckland Airport Sale: Ready to Fly

This blog was visited by a large number of Googlers yesterday. They were searching for Auckland International Airport [AIA] information.

Those searches were principally related to questions about the possibility of its sale, so I thought I would write something opinionated on just that subject.

This interest would have been sparked by the National Government's relaxing of rules and legislation surrounding the overseas ownership and purchase of New Zealand assets announced by them today.

I wrote back in February that we were likely to see just this very scenario occur:

With the new National Government in place and the current relaxing of the rules around the RMA, the major planning law that has stopped economic development of New Zealand, we could expect to see developments in other areas of business in regards to relaxing laws and legislation to allow business to flow quicker and therefore more efficiently and more profitably.

Small parts of overseas investment criteria have been relaxed immediately but there will be a review of the Overseas Investment Act with a view to relax current complications and confusion.

The 3 main points of the act that will be looked at latter in the year that are pertinent to any possible bid for Auckland Airport are:

1. the thresholds determining which land and business investments are screened are set at the right level -- so only genuinely sensitive assets are captured.

2. Providing greater certainty for investors, by removing the ability to substantially change overseas investment rules during applications.

3. Simplifying the screening of investments in sensitive land, while ensuring that overseas investors are subject to a higher standard than domestic investors.

The airport sale was stymied by the previous Labour Administration by a law that was expressly passed for the AIA bid by DAE and the Canadian Teacher's Pension fund as well as confusion brought by the 3 parts of the act noted above.

With an overhaul of this act, relaxation of other overseas investment rules and a business friendly shake-up of Auckland Council's that hold airport shares, Auckland Airport will soon be in play.

Disclosure I own AIA shares in the Share Investor Portfolio


Auckland International Airport @ Share Investor Blog

Stock of the Week: Auckland International Airport

Is another Auckland Airport Bid likely?
Long VS Short: Auckland International Airport
Auckland Airport needs main focus on its core business
Marketwatch - Auckland International Airport
Why did you buy that stock: Auckland International Airport
Cullen's move on Auckland Airport has far reaching effects
Cullen's move on AIA tax plan Anti-Business
AIA profit stays grounded
Softening opposition to CPPIB bid for AIA
Directors of AIA bribe brokers not to sell
What is Auckland Airport worth to you?
Second bite at AIA by CPPIB might just fly
AIA new directors must focus on shareholders
Auckland Airport merger deal nosedives
The Canadians have landed
AIA incentive scheme must fly out the window
Government market manipulation over AIA/DAE deal
DAE move on AIA: Will it fly?

Discuss this stock @ Share Investor Forum

Related Amazon Reading

Mergers and Acquisitions Basics : The Key Steps of Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Investments
Mergers and Acquisitions Basics : The Key Steps of Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Investments by Michael E. S. Frankel
Buy new: $29.16 / Used from: $17.12
Usually ships in 24 hours


c Share Investor 2009