Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Financial weapons of mass destruction

In the wake of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fallout last week, I thought it appropriate to re-post an article that I wrote in April this year for the Everything Warren Buffett Blog on reactions to the sub prime fallout.

In less than 5 months things have gotten considerably worse.


Latest on global financial fallout - to July 17 2008


The Fannie-Freddie Dodge -Washington Post
Dollar Little Changed Before Housing, Manufacturing Reports - Bloomberg
Financial crisis and inflation fears plunge w markets - Merco Press
Dollar up, stocks dip on Fannie Freddie plan - Forbes
Economic pain: 'Payback' for debt-fueled growth? - USA Today
Of Course It's A Recession -Forbes
Britain Appears Recession-Bound - BusinessWeek
Economist Predicts Worst is Just Ahead - West Orlando News


The announcement on March 31 (US time) that secretary Paulson is going to regulate the United State's financial markets with changes to it not seen since the Great Depression leaves me with a thought that has been running rat wheels in my mind ever since the current "Credit Crunch" kicked off.

Midway through last year, the Fed began sticking its filthy little hands in dikes all across the financial backbone of the USA by propping up institutions who had lent too much money to those who now cannot pay and to keep the wheels of commerce greased by trying to increase liquidity in the credit market-so we can do business with each other.

Now I am skeptical at the best of times as to State involvement in anything, let alone interfering in capital markets and don't have the foggiest whether the announcement by Paulson is going to change anything in the future at all.


Global financial fallout - to April 31 2008

German watchdog eyes $600 bln global bank losses: report- Reuters
Overhaul of Wall Street regulation doesn't address current crisis- International Herald Tribune
International Financial Panel Urges Bank Disclosures on Risk Exposure- Wall Street Journal
G7 to press big banks to reveal extent of credit crunch losses -Times Online
US prepares to give Fed sweeping oversight powers -Taipei Times
Ghosts of the Great Depression -Business Spectator
US Fed to be grilled over massive support to financial system- MercoPress
World Bank cuts East Asia growth forecast- Channel News Asia
East Asia Economies Pressed by Inflation- The Associated Press


The 1933 changes didn't stop the bear market in the 1970s, it didn't stop the sharemarket crash of 1987 or the tech bubble bursting in 2000 or the current credit crisis because of dodgy lending and investment practices related to that lending.

The interventions by the Fed and its global equivalents, to shore up credit liquidity is the main rat on the wheel in my mind.

What have these interventions stopped?

One can only speculate but one can do that with a largish amount of surety.

During the Great Depression, when faith in financial markets at the time was at an all time low there simply wasn't any intervention by the State apparatus to ameliorate what happened on that infamous day in 1929 when Wall Street threw a woopsey and capitalism jumped out of tall buildings in the financial districts around New York and around the world.

Have interventions in financial markets by State backed funds globally stopped some sort of 2008 crash from happening?

Probably, but not to the extent of 1929, but it is clear that it would have been a crash of some serious nature had there not been intervention.

Another question I have running through my head is, how long will the squillions of taxpayer dollars pumped into the economy stave off the inevitability of a bigger blowout?

That is harder to answer. In order to know better one would have to know the losses involved in the Sub prime loans and associated sub prime bonds, and we are no closer to knowing that than knowing if Hillary Clinton is going to be the Democratic Party leader or if Barry Obama still loves his preacher.

The vexed question of the massive derivatives market also looms in the minds of investors:

Large amounts of risk, particularly credit risk, have become concentrated in the hands of relatively few derivatives dealers, who in addition trade extensively with one another. The troubles of one could quickly infect the others. On top of that, these dealers are owed huge amounts by nondealer counterparties. Some of these counterparties, as I’ve mentioned, are linked in ways that could cause them to contemporaneously run into a problem because of a single event (such as the implosion of the telecom industry or the precipitous decline in the value of merchant power projects). Linkage, when it suddenly surfaces, can trigger serious systemic problems.

"Derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction. The dangers are now latent--but they could be lethal".

[Warren Buffett 2003]


Warren Buffett aside, I don't think anyone fancies the Fed's chances of shoring up the derivatives market should the dominoes start to topple.


What is clear is this scenario has at least the rest of the year to fully play out and further State intervention should be carefully applied only if is really going to work and not because the Fed needs to be seen to be doing something.

Hold onto those gold bars and keep the cash under the mattress, you just might need it.

Related Share Investor Reading

Global Market meltdown: What is Warren Buffett doing?
Credit crunch a blessing in disguise
Market meltdown: I can smell the fear from here

Mr Market gets his groove on
What happened to risk?
Global credit squeeze: There is no free lunch
Lenders must come clean over losses to restore faith in credit markets

Share Investor Forum-Discuss this topic

Related Amazon Reading

Recessions and Depressions: Understanding Business Cycles
Recessions and Depressions: Understanding Business Cycles by Todd Alan Knoop
Buy new: $25.00 / Used from: $24.00
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2008


Sky City outlines a clear future plan

Today's newsletter to Sky City Entertainment [SKC.NZ] shareholders got me a little excited for the company and its future direction, and that hasn't happened for a few years.

The content of the newsletter outlined the direction that CEO Nigel Morrison wanted the company was to proceed towards, how it was going to get there, and a time frame to stick to.

The language was clear, to the point, and had none of the "management speak" of past shareholder communication.

It reminds me somewhat of the management at Mainfreight Ltd [MFT.NZ] and their no nonsense approach to ramming their point home.

Now whether management achieve their stated goals is another question, but previous management were truly awful communicators; to their shareholders,within the company and definitely to their customers and the market.

A clear way of communication in business often translates into positive results. Uncomplicated communication gives a clear direction for employees and can translate into a more productive and happier workforce and hopefully a better bottom line.

Morrison has also made practical moves towards the stated company goal, new management have been hired to grow individual casino businesses and a focus on organic growth is emphasised throughout the shareholder communication.

The direction the company is headed is most directly apparent in the outlook for 2009.

"Our shareholders have made it clear to us that they want us to focus on maximising the performance of the assets we operate. This is what we will be doing. as we have said previously, we expect to achieve this within an 18-month time frame. We will retain tight control over capital and not expend capital unless we are very confident of healthy returns for shareholders".

Lets hope the follow through shows some concrete results in the following 18 months.


Related Share Investor reading

Business gobbledygook puts up barriers to communication
Share Investor Forum-Discuss this topic

Related Amazon Reading

Business Communication (Harvard Business Essentials)
Business Communication (Harvard Business Essentials) by Business Essentials Harvard
Buy new: $13.57 / Used from: $8.38
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2008

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Winston's silence is telling

It seems more than a little hypocritical of Winston Peters to say what he calls the "National Party having secret donations from rich backers to trusts and other intermediaries to hide when the money comes from", when his party has probably been doing the same thing itself.

What is even worse is that Winnie backed and voted for the Electoral Finance Act. Something that he and its other backers said would "stop big money from buying an election".

Peters and his party have clearly been given money from ex pat billionaire Owen Glenn, there are emails and other evidence to support this. Peters still denies that he or his party have benefited from any large donation from Glenn, "into his or his party's bank account", going to the extent of asking Audrey Young, from the NZ Herald, the journo who broke the scandal, to "check his accounts".

Of course Winston or his party may not have got money directly into any of their respective accounts but money from Glenn may have been paid into a trust account, his PR company account or any other trust that Peters or his party or members operate.

Every other party in Parliament do similar things but it is usually no secret when asked by media.

In the light of evidence that Owen Glenn did give money to Peters, at least through a related party, Peters needs to front up with the truth rather than hiding his sanctimonious hypocritical manoeuvres under spin and bluster.

Yet can bet that Peters would want the full picture from anyone else in his position.

It was his trademark when he was in opposition.

Related Political Animal Reading

Labour gets tangled in Peter's lies
Leaked Glenn Email
Winston got secret donations from Owen Glenn
Labour Party Election funding murky at best
Electoral Finance Bill: The purpose is clear
The Owen Glenn Story: Singing the same tune but hitting a bum note

c Political Animal 2008

As recession bites Sky City bites back

I have had a correspondent through email over several months asking me about whether he should sell his Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd [SKC.NZX] shares. In March he asked the following question.

I'm a big fan of your blog, checking it most days for updates (particularly after a tough day on the sharemarket).

I just have a quick question regarding SKC. I hold some shares, which make up about 2/5ths of my (rather small) portfolio - as of late, they seem to be doing nothing but falling. Now, I am not one to sell on a whim, but I have been asking myself recently, is SKC something I should stick with?

I bought in at $4.30 and, after the 7 cent drop today, have lost a fair amount of money. Where do you see this stock going in the short to medium term? How about the long term? I've read the newspaper articles, including the ones on your page, that were posted today, but I'm not sure what to make of the situation.

I suppose selling when the price is so low is not really an option, but would love to know what you think as you are also a holder of SKC shares.

My answer was:

Now I don't really recommend what others should be doing with their
shares or investments but I will tell you what I am going to do with
my SKC shares and why and maybe that will give you an idea.

The rider is that your circumstances will be different to mine: the
dollar amount you are talking about will be different, your investment
term might be longer or shorter, you may have held the shares longer
or shorter than me, etc ,etc.

You will have to decide based on those and other conditions.

I have held my 35000 shares for around 6 years and hold them at a cost
of just over 2 bucks a share.

I don't check share prices daily but it sounds like the SP is around
$NZ 3.70 odd as of today. That is the lowest price they have ever been
since 2002 but at one stage mine were worth $70000.00 more at their
high point of around $5.70.

My investment term for shares is a minimum of 10 years, so I'm not
particularly worried about their current share price. Every share is
getting battered.

The current uncertainties re the credit crunch are a concern to me and
I believe shares could drop another 20% easily, so be prepared for
your shares to drop below 3 bucks.

In the long run though, SKC shows some promise.

The new head seems aggressive in his desire to improve business
without buying more businesses and he has the track record in other
casinos to back up his big mouth.

Some fat has been trimmed from operating costs and I believe the
company is ready to bounce back.

The company does have a largish debt burden but has very cheap credit
funding secured for many years.

The only cloud on the horizon is government legislation.

It is a great cash business, a monopoly in most of its markets and a
great hedge in uncertain economic times.

I have no intention of selling, but if you need the money the shares
are not going to improve in value until the credit crunch has blown
over and that is going to take many months to come.

I hope that has been helpful.


In subsequent emails my correspondent continued to fret over the plunging price of his Sky City holding.

I answered that the company will do OK in a recession, with the implication being that other companies will suffer.

Retailing stocks in New Zealand have been especially hard hit. I have held several retail stocks for some years but given plunging stock prices have bought some new retail stocks, as well as other sectors, into the Share Investor Portfolio.

The general point made to my correspondent was that you shouldn't sell your shares unless you really needed to or if there was something significantly wrong with the company you invested in.

The Sky City example makes a good general point. Stocks and investments are losing value currently. There are good reasons why that is the case. A probable global recession brought on by the Sub Prime credit crunch and high oil, interest and food costs will have impacts on company profits. That will not last forever though, so unless you need the money selling is not a good idea.

You invested in a business and businesses have good and bad times. Get used to it.

Investors who sold Sky City over its share price rort will probably be kicking themselves. The capital value of the company has nearly halved since February but the profit guidance made in that month was re affirmed yesterday.

"There's a lot of concern that in this environment there are a lot of companies contemplating earnings downgrades and we wanted to confirm that we weren't," SkyCity chief executive Nigel Morrison said.

Proving that Mr Market has gone overboard in marking this company down.

Sky City isn't recession proof though. Expect it to struggle slightly in the 1 July to 31 Dec half.

Other stocks listed on the NZX have also been oversold in my opinion.

My correspondent didn't sell his Sky City shares shares.

Disc: I own SKC shares in the Share Investor Portfolio


Sky City Convention Centre @ Share Investor

Share Investor discusses Convention Centre proposal with CEO Nigel Morrison
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money Loser: Part Two
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money loser
SKC Convention Centre power-point slide illustrations & SKC submission to Auckland City Council

Sky City Entertainment Group @ Share Investor


Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Presentation to Macquarie Group
Morningstar Revalues Sky City Entertainment Group
Guest Post - Michele Hewitson Interview: Nigel Morrison
Failed Sky City bid for Christchurch Casino good news for Shareholders
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Christchurch Casino bid falls short of Investment Criteria
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Never mind the width feel the volume
Sky City Annual Meeting & 2011 - 2012 Profit Forecast
Stock of the Week: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Sky City set to lose National Convention Centre bid
Sky City Entertainment Group: Australian Acquisition on the Cards?
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: 2010 Full Year Profit Analysis
Sky City Entertainment Group 2010 Full Year Profit Preview
Chart of the Week: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Share Investor discusses Convention Centre proposal with CEO Nigel Morrison
Share Investor Q & A: Sky City CEO, Nigel Morrison
Sky City Entertainment: CEO Nigel Morrison discusses 2010 HY
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money Loser: Part Two
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money loser
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Download full Company analysis
Sky City 2010 full year profit looking good
Long Term View: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Sky City Entertainment: CEO Nigel Morrison discusses 2010 Half Year
Sky City Entertainment Group 2010 Interim Profit Review
Sky City to focus on Gaming
Sky City debts levels now more manageable
Insider Trading on Sky City shares
Sky City Profit Upgrade: Always on the Cards
Sky City's Current Cinema "Boom" a Horror Story in Disguise
Stock of the Week: Sky City Entertainment Group
Are Insiders selling Sky City Stock?
Sky City Entertainment 2009 Interim Result Preamble
2008 Sky City profit analysis
Sky City share offer confusing and unfair for smaller shareholders
Sky City Entertainment 2008 Full Year profit results , NZX release, 2008 full year presentation, result briefing webcast, financial statements
Sky City 2008 profit preamble
Sky City outlines a clear future plan
As recession bites Sky City bites back
Sky City Assets: Buy, sell and hold
Why did you buy that stock? [Sky City Entertainment]
Sky City Share Volumes set tongues wagging
Sky City half year exceptional on cost cutting
NZX Press release: Sky City profit to HY end Dec 2007
Sky City Cinemas no Blockbuster
Sky City Entertainment share price drop
New Broom set to sweep
Sky City Management: Blind, deaf and numb
Sky City sale could be off
Opposition to takeover
Premium for control
Sky City receives takeover bid
Sky City Casino Full Year Profit to June 30 2007
Setting the record straight
Sky City CEO resigns
Sky City Casino: Under performing
Sky City Casino 2007 HY Profit(analysis)
Sky City Casino 2007 HY Profit


Discuss SKC @ Share Investor Forum
Download SKC Company Reports

Recommended Amazon Reading

The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A    Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition)
The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) by Benjamin Graham
Buy new: $14.95 / Used from: $6.99
Usually ships in 24 hours


c Share Investor 2008