Friday, August 7, 2009

Beware of "Black October"

A recent market update by Kingfish Ltd [KFL.NZ] the listed portfolio management vehicle, got me thinking.

In this document they wax lyrical about how well share prices for the companies they hold have done well over the last quarter and they are right, they have done well.

Ryman Healthcare [RYM.NZ] Freightways Ltd [FRE.NZ] Mainfrieght Ltd [MFT.NZ] Sky City Entertainment Group[SKC.NZ] and many others have stacked value on their share prices.

Sky City alone has gained over 40% since its recent $2.51 lows.

Kingfish have all these companies in their portfolio bar Sky City. I own them all in the Share Investor Portfolio.

But rather than reason to get excited if you are an investor with a shorter term horizon you are likely to get a bit of a shock in the back pocket, if stockmarket history is anything to go by.

The month of October is notoriously bad for global markets, the 1929 crash happened in October and so did the 1987 crash - the 2008 crash likewise. Even if you discount those three historical events October is just a bummer month for stocks, it is probably a psychological thing where historical events have self perpetuated into a down month.

Nevertheless it does happen and that month could be the time to start buying again. My wallet is firmly closed, for now.

Take care of yourselves, be careful when deciding to buy and make some money why don't ya.

See you soon.

Recent Share Investor Reading

Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Portfolio

Related Amazon Reading

The Great Crash: How the Stock Market Crash of 1929 Plunged the World into Depression
The Great Crash: How the Stock Market Crash of 1929 Plunged the World into Depression by Selwyn Parker
Buy new: $17.90 / Used from: $13.35
Usually ships in 2 to 4 weeks


c Share Investor 2009

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Bruce Sheppard's debt debate points the finger at you


Bruce Sheppard's crusade on NZX listed companies and their debt levels has apparently come to an end but what has it achieved?

Well, it is always good to get frank and open debate about our listed companies, because if you have been reading my comments over the years the NZX and their mates are almost a closed shop as far as communication and disclosure are concerned.

Bruce also highlighted several companies that have either collapsed or a sailing very close to the wind in terms of their debt levels; Cadmus-Provenco, Nuplex Ltd [NPX.NX], Fisher & Paykel Appliances [FPA.NZ] and more.

The non-reply's to Bruce's letters from Sky Network Television [SKT.NZ] and Team Talk reveal more about respective company management and poor attitude to shareholders apart from a possible debt problem.

Nothing substantive in terms of conclusions were made by Bruce but he quite rightly puts the responsibility back on individual investors to do their own homework:

Just as I and the SA are prepared to be judged by what we do, right or wrong, well or badly, so too should companies be judged. So rather than me analysing the responses in detail or providing you with any guidance on the strength or weakness of the companies written to, you must do this for yourself by reading our letters and their replies.

The companies were on my list because I thought, and still think, they have too much debt and are at risk in an economy such as this. That is my prerogative, you will each have your own risk profiles and you will each analyse the prospects and debt profile of these companies for yourself. It is my view that debt is the number one risk faced by equity investors today and that is why I did this work. 

Read the full conclusion @ Stirring the Pot

Why am I interested in Bruce's opinion so much on such matters?

Well, I mostly like what he says, he stimulates debate and he is an influential person.

The main point of Bruce's debt exercise? Looking at issues like debt, company management and company performance are essential when investing and should be done by you dear reader.

Oh, and he also finally disclosed ownership of shares in a couple of companies.



Related Links

Bruce Sheppard's Stirring the Pot


Recent Share Investor Reading
Discuss this Topic @ Share Investor Forum




c Share Investor 2009



Market Quickie: Sky TV Worth Watching




I have given Sky Network Television [SKT.NZ] a very wide birth over the years, I have never really understood a company that spent more than 10 years losing money and has only been making it for the last 3 or 4.

I guess they were building up a business?

I don't like its business model; a company that relies on continuous large amounts of capital to keep competition at bay doesn't make for a good long term return.

Sky is also at the mercy of Government regulation, currency fluctuation, product quality and large capital depreciation.

What I do like though (I am such a negative bugger) is that it is a virtual monopoly-in Pay TV terms -but even that is under threat by new technology (which SKY is trying to take a punt on) via the Internet and satellite TV and product.

It hasn't done well over the last year, with a more than 16% drop in profit to just over $NZ42 million in the half year to 31 Dec 2008 on higher revenue of nearly $350 million. This is due to higher capital costs, which I outlined above.

Why the hell then do I mention the company today if I see little redeeming about it in its day to day operations?

I kinda like its share price.

The shares are well off their low of $3.15 during the last 52 weeks but the corollary to that is that they are off their 52 week high of $5.10 and well off their all-time high of $6.75 in late 2006 (see 5 year chart above)

I reckon this company is worth a good short-term to medium term punt.



Sky Network Television @ Share Investor

Watching Sky Television
Market Quickie: Sky TV Worth Watching

Discuss SKT @ Share Investor Forum
Download SKT Company Reports




Buy Toughen Up: What I've Learned About Surviving Tough Times

Toughen Up: What I've Learned About Surviving Tough Times

Toughen Up - Fishpond.co.nz

c Share Investor 2009

Get me a Mogadon already, I'm over-stimulated

I wasn't going to write anything else about the state of the economy, In April I was getting bored with the relentless bad news; stockmarket plunges, company collapses and endless Government "stimulation" plans to resurrect economies all around the world and I thought I would devote my writing to getting down to the day to day business of the operation of the stockmarket and company performance.

Oh how things have changed.

Gee, now that the economy is improving, I thought I would have another go at telling you what I think about our economic situation and the apparent green shoots that are now starting to turn into large bamboo poles.

All the signs are that a large number of global economies are improving, economic indicators are up, banks are doing better, company profits are consistent with forecasts, manufacturing looks like it might have reached bottom, more cars are being sold (mmm), all is rosy with the world and Elvis and Michael Jackson are recording a duet in a Burger King somewhere in Kentucky.

This may indeed all be happening, but if you ask yourself why, then you might find yourself uncovering more questions than you answer.

This apparent lazerous turnaround in our collective economic fortunes -it isn't even a very strong one but people are behaving like it is-is linked to one thing and one thing only, the shit load of money that Barrack Obama and his progressive mates the world over have dumped into their economies.

But that is a good thing and its real right?

Well, no is the answer to both of those questions.

I have pointed this out before but this money is being printed by various central banks worldwide and some of it is borrowed and eventually it is going to have to be paid back.

That means higher taxes for those that are working, the middle classes primarily, and more wealth used to service debt and less productivity, in other words another recession sometime in the future or a continuation of the current one.

Socialism doesn't work, borrowing money to give to people to buy cars, shoes, computers, purchase imaginary carbon credits and flat screen TVs may seem like a paradise that keeps the wheels of commerce greased but what it actually does is put off the inevitable.

I really hate to be a pessimistic little bastard but we should all be very skeptical of these signs of economic recovery because they hide the fact that it is based on a lie and is not sustainable in the long run.

I know we have been stimulated to the point of a straight jacketed stupor but we really should ditch the over-priced Starbucks, cigarettes and borrowed moola and wake up.

Dont get me wrong, economically things are going to get better and business is doing OK, we just have to "get on and do it". But its time for careful rethink when it comes to the signs that things are all rosy again.

They are not, and we should learn not to get carried away with it all as some of us are currently doing -the big bounce in global stockmarkets is evidence of that.

Cautious optimism is needed.

Back to stocks again tomorrow.


Recent Share Investor Reading

Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Forum


Related Amazon Reading

Stimulus Cash Finder: How to get your Share of the $787 Billion Stimulus Bill
Stimulus Cash Finder: How to get your Share of the $787 Billion Stimulus Bill by Rupert Hart
Buy new: $9.95
Usually ships in 24 hours

2009 Congressional Stimulus Bill
2009 Congressional Stimulus Bill by 111th Congress
Buy new: $0.99
Usually ships in 24 hours


c Share Investor 2009