Showing posts with label Aorangi Securities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aorangi Securities. Show all posts

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Allan Hubbard Saga: 7th Grant Thornton Report - Aorangi Securities

The Seventh Grant Thornton Reports (there are two separate ones for HMF & Aorangi) into Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities Limited and Hubbard Management Funds which are the investment vehicles that Allan Hubbard has been charged with fraud over makes for grim reading for Hubbard and investors in the two failed entities which are now in statutory management.

These latest reports cover off some of the detail of fraud charges that have been brought to the Timaru High Court by the SFO just a few weeks ago after over a year of meticulous investigation.

Lets look at Aorangi here and we will cover off HMF in a separate post.

Investors may receive 8c in the dollar in July but this is defendant on a refinancing loan due at the end of last month. Long- term, investors also may have to wait a lengthy period for money to be returned because of the complex nature of investments, ownership issues, and questions over whether Mr Hubbard's purported transfer of assets from him personally to Aorangi are legitimate.

The first glaring inconsistency in this report is over the loan portfolio and issues are raised over what investors were told they were investing in and what actually happened.

"We have conducted a review of the Aorangi loan portfolio from 2007 to 2010. We have identified a very different investment profile in 2007 when Aorangi had $82 million invested in South Canterbury Finance Limited to June 2010 when it had $60 million invested with business entities associated with Mr Hubbard.

Aorangi’s financial records as at 31 March 2009 (before the transfer of the Hubbard Interests to the charitable trusts) had Aorangi’s assets close to $114 million which included the following investments:

South Canterbury Finance 12.2 million
Southbury Group Limited 33.6 million
Te Tua 13.7 million
Total 59.5 million

These three investments represent more than 50% of Aorangi's assets at that time and are entities closely associated with Mr Hubbard. They do not represent investments supported by mortgage security over land as requested by some investors in their investment authorities.

The Hubbard Interests purportedly transferred to Aorangi later were not included in Aorangi’s financial statements as at 31 March 2009". Seventh Grant Thornton Report - Aorangi

So this is clearly detail of false accounting and misleading investor documentation that Hubbard has been charged for fraud over by the Serious Fraud Office.

It has also been indicated that Allan Hubbard's much talked about (by himself and his supporters) injection of his own personal assets into Aorangi has strings attached. He may actually still legally own around $60 million of assets he says he put into the business so it could make this sum legally claimable by Aorangi as a lender to Hubbard. We all know Mr Hubbard has financial challenges of his own so this could clearly have further deleterious consequences for Aorangi investors considering $60 million is more than half of all the assets in this investment vehicle.

The Thornton report points out the serious nature of Mr Hubbard's claim that he put his own assets into Aorangi to stem investor losses:

"In our introduction to this report we commented on the difficulty being encountered with the purported introduction of Hubbard Interests into Aorangi. Most of the Hubbard Interests recorded in Aorangi were introduced by way of journal entry. There are no records of cash transactions in return for the introduction of the Hubbard Interests. Legal advice provided to us means that we cannot rely upon the purported transfer of Hubbard Interests into Aorangi at this time and as a result, and given the financial position of Mr & Mrs Hubbard, Aorangi investors may face a large shortfall. This means that any proceeds from the disposal of these assets cannot be repaid to investors until the financial position of Mr Hubbard is known, which may take some time and may be subject to dispute from personal creditors." Seventh Grant Thornton Report - Aorangi

Some dodgy bookkeeping and major issues over the validity of what Mr Hubbard claimed he did.

The bulk of the rest of the report basically covers off what has been canvassed many times before. Much of the lending in Aorangi is to individuals or companies which are having difficulties paying loans back - or are not paying at all - assets in Aorangi have often been pledged more than once in relation to security or more than one party may have claims on an asset. Some of these parties are related to Mr Hubbard either personally or are related businesses such as the defunct South Canterbury Finance.

This seventh Grant Thorton Report on Aorangi will put investors into further despair over what they might get back. They will get back something but when and how much are the two big questions.

For Allan Hubbard the evidence that he has been doing wrong becomes even clearer and of course we may see the genesis of all this some time in the High Court if he stands trial for the 50 counts of fraud laid against him by the SFO.

One can only hope that he decides to plead guilty as this will help somewhat expedite the repatriation of funds back to investors that he has lost for them over the last few years.

Allan Hubbard Saga

Full SFO Statement on SCF Fraud Investigation

Hubbard Letter to Simon Power

Download Grant Thornton Report 1
Download Grant Thornton Report 2
Download Grant Thornton Report 3
Download Grant Thornton Report 4
Download Grant Thornton Report 5
Download Grant Thornton Report 6
Download Grant Thornton Report 7 - Aorangi Securities

Join the Put Allan Hubbard Away Facebook Group

GUEST POST: Deborah Hill Cone: NZ - crazy people, crazy place
Allan Hubbard Saga: When Monkeys Attack!
Allan Hubbard Saga: Victims Share Stories
Allan Hubbard Saga: The Defence
Allan Hubbard Saga: Fraud Charges - The Detail
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard to Face Fraud Charges
Adam Feely on Hubbard Fraud Charges
Allan Hubbard Saga: Answers to Investor's Frequently Asked Questions
Allan Hubbard Saga: Still Feral After All These Years
Allan Hubbard Saga: Sixth Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard looks set to cop a plea
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters Risk Legal Action
Allan Hubbard Saga: Mental Challenge
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard Defiant in 2011
Book Review: Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time, by Virginia Green
Allan Hubbard Saga: VIDEO - Hubbard Biographer Virginia Green on TVNZ's Breakfast
Book Extract - Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 3, The Final Cut
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 2
Allan Hubbard Saga: Paul Carruthers Goes Feral... Again
Allan Hubbard: The Biography
Allan Hubbard Saga: On Forged Signatures and Uncharitable Trusts
Allan Hubbard Saga: Evidence of Fraud now Clear
Allan Hubbard Saga: NBR VS the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: South Canterbury Finance to be investigated by the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: Third Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Will He Walk?
Allan Hubbard Saga: No Longer Bothered by Botherway
Allan Hubbard Saga: 60 Minutes Interview, Sept 23 2010
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters head to the exit door
Allan Hubbard Saga: Threats & the Mysterious PWC Report
Allan Hubbard Supporters: Conflict of Interest
VW Veneer reveals BMW heart
VIDEO: Jenni McManus Explains Allan Hubbard Collapse
Allan Hubbard Statement on SCF Receivership
VIDEO: Sandy Maier - full news conference on SCF Receivership
Market Alert: South Canterbury Finance to be placed in Receivership
Allan Hubbard: Ignorant Supporters Blissfully Unaware
Thornton Report 2: Allan Hubbard Guilty as Charged
Allan Hubbard: Full TV3 Interview - July 16 2010
Thornton Report 1: Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities
Bothered by Simon Botherway



c Share Investor 2011

Monday, June 27, 2011

Allan Hubbard Saga: The Prosecution

We have looked at a probable defence for alleged fraudster Allan Hubbard so now we must look at the case for the prosecution; what the details surrounding the case are and what he could be convicted of if found guilty.

In the Sixth Grant Thornton Report (A 7th is due at the end of June) it outlines the detail of the SFO case thus far and is a good starting point for prosecution purposes:

On Aorangi Securities Ltd: “The amount due to investors is $96 million. The preliminary estimate of the realisable value of the portfolio is in the range of approximately $87 million to $97 million.

Based on these estimates, investors could suffer a loss and Mr Hubbard would receive no money from Aorangi. No interest would be paid with realisations at this level.”

On Hubbard Management Funds: “The report states that some shares recorded as belonging to HMF are subject to possible claims from others. They say shares have been pledged as security to financiers for borrowings made by Mr Hubbard or parties related to him.

As previously stated, statutory managers’ reconciliation as at 31 March 2010 indicates that there were insufficient assets to provide investors the investments noted on their statements. There were also investments that were not allocated to investors and some valuations that, in the statutory managers’ opinion, were incorrect.

Once all adjustments and corrections were processed, the shortfall of assets compared with the investor statements is estimated at about $31 million.” Sixth Grant Thornton Report

So here we have a "shortfall" of $31 million for HMF and a reasonable chance of recovery with Aorangi. In relation to the facts as stated above we now come to how and why some of the above occurred.

Under the Crimes Act 1961 Mr Hubbard has been charged with more than 50 counts of fraud and the SFO have outlined why they are charging and what for:


"Crimes Act 1961

Section 220 - Theft by person in special relationship

(1) This section applies to any person who has received or is in possession of, or has control over, any property on terms or in circumstances that the person knows require the person—
(a) to account to any other person for the property, or for any proceeds arising from the property; or

(b) to deal with the property, or any proceeds arising from the property, in accordance with the requirements of any other person.

(2) Every one to whom subsection (1) applies commits theft who intentionally fails to account to the other person as so required or intentionally deals with the property, or any proceeds of the property, otherwise than in accordance with those requirements.

(3) This section applies whether or not the person was required to deliver over the identical property received or in the person's possession or control.

(4) For the purposes of subsection (1), it is a question of law whether the circumstances required any person to account or to act in accordance with any requirements.


Section 242 - False statement by promoter, etc

(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, in respect of any body, whether incorporated or unincorporated and whether formed or intended to be formed, makes or concurs in making or publishes any false statement, whether in any prospectus, account, or otherwise, with intent—

(a) to induce any person, whether ascertained or not, to subscribe to any security within the meaning of the Securities Act 1978 ; or

(b) to deceive or cause loss to any person, whether ascertained or not; or

(c) to induce any person, whether ascertained or not, to entrust or advance any property to any other person.

(2) In this section, false statement means any statement in respect of which the person making or publishing the statement—

(a) knows the statement is false in a material particular; or

(b) is reckless as to the whether the statement is false in a material particular.


Section 260 – False accounting

Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, with intent to obtain by deception any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, or to deceive or cause loss to any other person,—
(a) makes or causes to be made, or concurs in the making of, any false entry in any book or account or other document required or used for accounting purposes; or
(b) omits or causes to be omitted, or concurs in the omission of, any material particular from any such book or account or other document; or
(c) makes any transfer of any interest in a stock, debenture, or debt in the name of any person other than the owner of that interest". Crimes Act 1961

So Mr Hubbard has been charged with false accounting, false statements and Theft by a person in a special relationship. These relate to instances of forged signatures, failure to do adequate paperwork, omissions in paperwork, failure to disclose business relationships in relation to insider lending, failure to provide adequate information on which investors can make clear decisions on investing with Hubbard etc.

The evidence for prosecution is very clear, it just has to be proven in court, if it gets that far.

I am picking the SFO will pursue the false accounting, false statements made as a promoter and the theft charges as they appear to be the most serious charges laid.

These are very serious charges and any one count alone if found guilty would be enough for a suitably serious sentence.

Allan Hubbard Saga

Full SFO Statement on SCF Fraud Investigation

Hubbard Letter to Simon Power

Download Grant Thornton Report 1
Download Grant Thornton Report 2
Download Grant Thornton Report 3
Download Grant Thornton Report 4
Download Grant Thornton Report 5
Download Grant Thornton Report 6

Join the Put Allan Hubbard Away Facebook Group

GUEST POST: Deborah Hill Cone: NZ - crazy people, crazy place
Allan Hubbard Saga: When Monkeys Attack!
Allan Hubbard Saga: Victims Share Stories
Allan Hubbard Saga: The Defence
Allan Hubbard Saga: Fraud Charges - The Detail
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard to Face Fraud Charges
Adam Feely on Hubbard Fraud Charges
Allan Hubbard Saga: Answers to Investor's Frequently Asked Questions
Allan Hubbard Saga: Still Feral After All These Years
Allan Hubbard Saga: Sixth Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard looks set to cop a plea
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters Risk Legal Action
Allan Hubbard Saga: Mental Challenge
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard Defiant in 2011
Book Review: Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time, by Virginia Green
Allan Hubbard Saga: VIDEO - Hubbard Biographer Virginia Green on TVNZ's Breakfast
Book Extract - Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 3, The Final Cut
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 2
Allan Hubbard Saga: Paul Carruthers Goes Feral... Again
Allan Hubbard: The Biography
Allan Hubbard Saga: On Forged Signatures and Uncharitable Trusts
Allan Hubbard Saga: Evidence of Fraud now Clear
Allan Hubbard Saga: NBR VS the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: South Canterbury Finance to be investigated by the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: Third Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Will He Walk?
Allan Hubbard Saga: No Longer Bothered by Botherway
Allan Hubbard Saga: 60 Minutes Interview, Sept 23 2010
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters head to the exit door
Allan Hubbard Saga: Threats & the Mysterious PWC Report
Allan Hubbard Supporters: Conflict of Interest
VW Veneer reveals BMW heart
VIDEO: Jenni McManus Explains Allan Hubbard Collapse
Allan Hubbard Statement on SCF Receivership
VIDEO: Sandy Maier - full news conference on SCF Receivership
Market Alert: South Canterbury Finance to be placed in Receivership
Allan Hubbard: Ignorant Supporters Blissfully Unaware
Thornton Report 2: Allan Hubbard Guilty as Charged
Allan Hubbard: Full TV3 Interview - July 16 2010
Thornton Report 1: Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities
Bothered by Simon Botherway



c Share Investor 2011

Monday, June 20, 2011

Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard to Face Fraud Charges

Well, I was skeptical that Allan Hubbard would be charged with fraud over dodgy goings on at Aorangi Securities and Hubbard Management Funds but just a few hours ago fifty charges under sections 220, 242 and 260 of the Crimes Act have been laid today in the District Court in Timaru by Adam Feely of the Serious Fraud Office.

The charges relate to theft by a person in a special relationship, false statements by a promoter and false accounting and they carry a maximum prison term of 10 years.

I was of the view only a few months ago that Hubbard would cop a plea and plead guilty to minor charges after his lawyers had stalled for time over the last year at times citing the need to get extra paperwork and his own counsel even questioning his mental capability to stand trial.

I have always been of the view that Mr Hubbard has been guilty of some very serious charges in relation to the aforementioned business and associated companies like South Canterbury Finance and there was enough evidence to support that view and I feel more than slightly vindicated to have had that view and still stick by it even after pressure from self-appointed and self-interested feral Hubbard supporters like Paul Carruthers , whose defense while being interviewed on radio live this afternoon was to attack the interviewer because he really had little substantive of factual to say.

In a SFO statement on the fraud charges it is clear why they were made and the deliberations Feely and his people had made before laying charges:

“Whatever the public may think, in considering whether serious fraud has been committed, the motives or lifestyle of an alleged offender are ultimately irrelevant. We have to consider matters such as whether deceit has occurred; the losses caused by that that deceit; and whether the facts meet the prescribed elements of one or more criminal offences.”

Mr Feeley said that prior to making a decision to lay charges the SFO gave very careful consideration to the Solicitor General’s Prosecution Guidelines, including the issue of whether a prosecution was in the public interest.

“The decision to charge has been reached only after extensive analysis of the evidence, as well as discussions with senior prosecution counsel, including the Crown Solicitors and the SFO Panel Counsel,” he said.

“Throughout the investigation we have been aware of the level of public interest in, and support for, Mr Hubbard, and the issues of Mr Hubbard’s age and health which have been raised by his lawyers.”

“However, we also have to consider the interests of justice and the interests of the investors relative to the evidence we have obtained during our inquiries.”

“We are satisfied that, on balance, there is strong public interest in having this matter put before the Court, and any issues regarding fitness to stand trial will be matters for the Court to adjudicate on.” SFO Statement 20 June 2011

So the pros and cons have been weighed and on balance we are going to see a trial and I would concur fully with the decision to do so.

As I wrote months ago if there was no trial and a consensus come to on minor changes nobody from either side would have been happy. This way the public can rightly assess the guilt or otherwise of Hubbard based on the facts put before a count.

As has been the case through this saga and the dodgy goings on over the collapses of South Canterbury Finance I expect Mr Hubbard to come out at some stage and strenuously deny the charges and evidence of fraud and claimed he is innocent .

I will be glued to the Timaru courts to see what happens next as my readers will likely be and we will see how Mr Hubbard's defence goes.

A guilty plea that would save taxpayers further expense would be the best way to go.

Allan Hubbard Saga

Full SFO Statement on SCF Fraud Investigation

Hubbard Letter to Simon Power

Download Grant Thornton Report 1
Download Grant Thornton Report 2
Download Grant Thornton Report 3
Download Grant Thornton Report 4
Download Grant Thornton Report 5
Download Grant Thornton Report 6

Join the Put Allan Hubbard Away Facebook Group

Allan Hubbard Saga: Fraud Charges - The Detail
Adam Feely on Hubbard Fraud Charges
Allan Hubbard Saga: Answers to Investor's Frequently Asked Questions
Allan Hubbard Saga: Still Feral After All These Years
Allan Hubbard Saga: Sixth Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard looks set to cop a plea
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters Risk Legal Action
Allan Hubbard Saga: Mental Challenge
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard Defiant in 2011
Book Review: Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time, by Virginia Green
Allan Hubbard Saga: VIDEO - Hubbard Biographer Virginia Green on TVNZ's Breakfast
Book Extract - Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 3, The Final Cut
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 2
Allan Hubbard Saga: Paul Carruthers Goes Feral... Again
Allan Hubbard: The Biography
Allan Hubbard Saga: On Forged Signatures and Uncharitable Trusts
Allan Hubbard Saga: Evidence of Fraud now Clear
Allan Hubbard Saga: NBR VS the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: South Canterbury Finance to be investigated by the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: Third Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Will He Walk?
Allan Hubbard Saga: No Longer Bothered by Botherway
Allan Hubbard Saga: 60 Minutes Interview, Sept 23 2010
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters head to the exit door
Allan Hubbard Saga: Threats & the Mysterious PWC Report
Allan Hubbard Supporters: Conflict of Interest
VW Veneer reveals BMW heart
VIDEO: Jenni McManus Explains Allan Hubbard Collapse
Allan Hubbard Statement on SCF Receivership
VIDEO: Sandy Maier - full news conference on SCF Receivership
Market Alert: South Canterbury Finance to be placed in Receivership
Allan Hubbard: Ignorant Supporters Blissfully Unaware
Thornton Report 2: Allan Hubbard Guilty as Charged
Allan Hubbard: Full TV3 Interview - July 16 2010
Thornton Report 1: Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities
Bothered by Simon Botherway




c Share Investor 2011

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Allan Hubbard Saga: Answers to Investor's Frequently Asked Questions

Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard to Face Fraud Charges

With so much written about Allan Hubbard and his plight in relation to billions of dollars of losses he has sustained for investors and the taxpayer lets spare a thought for investors directly affected by Allan's careless disregard for basic business protocols and sloppy and non existent paperwork.

Grant Thornton have prepared a list of frequently asked questions which former investors who lost money in Aorangi Securities and Hubbard Management Funds can turn to if they need some clarification of where they are now in relation to their losses and how their situation is affected, if at all, by the Serious Fraud Office probe into several of Mr Hubbard's businesses.

Investors not taking their own action against Hubbard would be wise to read below to find out where they stand. After all, the focus has all been on Hubbard and what he has gone through. Lets put spotlight back on those who lost money because of him as they cleary are the important ones here.

It should be noted that taxpayers who have lost upwards of $1.7 b as a result of Mr Hubbard's suspect business practices in relation to the collapse of South Canterbury Finance are still waiting for the outcome of a probe into possible fraud charges by the Serious Fraud Office and they have just yesterday sat down with Hubbard's lawyers to discuss the state of play, with a resolution "weeks away".

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. I deposited money for investment from an automatic payment after the date of statutory management on 20 June 2010. What happens to this money?

    Any funds contributed for investments following the date of statutory management were held in Trust. These funds have now been returned in full to investors.

  2. The media is suggesting that the cost of the statutory management is extensive. When will you provide details of these costs?

    We have outlined the costs to September 2010 in our fourth report and our costs to 31 January 2011 in our sixth report. Copies of these reports are available on our website.

  3. What is the relationship between the statutory management function and the Serious Fraud Office investigation?

    The two processes are completely independent and separate. We are responding to requests by the Serious Fraud Office but do not have regular communication with them or know the status of their investigation. Where investors have come to us with significant concerns, we have suggested that they consider voluntarily supplying information to the Serious Fraud Office to assist them with their investigation.

  4. What is a distressed investor and how do they apply for support from the emergency fund?

    A distressed investor is one who is experiencing significant cashflow issues as a result of the statutory management process. The independent assessor will look at the cash resources of each investor and their commitments and any other specific requirements such as medical care. Should you find that your circumstances change, you can apply to the fund or if you have previously applied and been turned down then you may reapply.

    Investors that get assistance from the fund will need to sign certain documents that will allow the Statutory Managers to offset the support that they have had against future repayments from Aorangi or Hubbard Management Funds. There were no offsets against the initial 3c in the $1 payment for Aorangi investors that was made in late October 2010.

  5. Will the payments made be a return of our investment or interest on our investments?

    The payments will be a return of the principal investment. We will not pay any interest in the short term. This is consistent with best practice in the circumstances. The reason for this is primarily tax driven. If we pay interest it would be subject to tax in the hands of most investors where as if we repaid the original investment capital it is not subject to tax. We are maintaining records that will allow us to calculate the interest should there be adequate assets and income within Aorangi to not only repay all capital but also the outstanding interest. Our current estimates, which are set out in our sixth report (available on our website) is that there is likely to be a small shortfall in the principal repayments and therefore no interest payments are anticipated at this time.

  6. I have an investment in Hubbard Management Funds. My statement says that I have an investment in Aorangi Securities as part of my Hubbard Management Funds portfolio. Will I be getting a payment from Aorangi?

    Hubbard Management Funds is an investor of Aorangi. Hubbard Management Funds will, therefore receive payments just like all other Aorangi investors. These funds will be deposited into Hubbard Management Funds and can only be distributed when the appropriate basis for distribution to Hubbard Management Funds investors is determined by court direction.

  7. When will payments be made to investors?

    Aorangi investors have received a small payment of 3c in the $1 as the first step in repaying their investment. As noted in our report we hope to make a more significant payment in the middle of 2011 as we realise Aorangi’s investments and receive income from investments.

    Hubbard Management Funds investors will receive payments once we have clarity on the correct and fair approach to repay the investors. As we have noted in our reports we will require court direction on this matter. Our legal advisers have indicated that it could be 2012 before any court direction is received. There is always the possibility that this direction may be challenged by an investor, which could further delay payments. We have detailed the key issues in our fourth report released in late October 2010. It is anticipated that papers will be filed with the Court in the third quarter of 2011. It is unlikely that any payment will be made before 2012.

  8. You have outlined in your reports the need for Hubbard Management Funds to receive court direction on the repayment of investors’ funds. Why is this, what are the processes involved, and will the investors be advised of the process?

    As we have noted in our reports, it is not clear whether this is a personalised investment fund or a pool investment fund. The answer to this has a significant impact on the allocation of the funds to each investor in Hubbard Management Funds. To provide everyone with certainty, we consider there is a need for the court to review the evidence for each of the possible distribution methods and to conclude which distribution method is going to provide the most equitable and fair allocation of funds to each investor. The processes to have a court hearing are complicated. You will be aware that there is considerable pressure within the court system and our legal advisers estimate that it is unlikely to be resolved until 2012. In the event that court direction is required every investor will be kept fully informed It is likely that the notice of proceedings will need to be served on each investor to provide them with the opportunity to consider whether they wish to be represented. Clearly, if all investors wish to be represented the process will be extended significantly and therefore we are investigating the ability of having some independent council appointed on behalf of the investors. We would emphasise that we are actively looking for alternatives that enable swifter resolution.

  9. How much am I exposed to the investments made by Aorangi and Hubbard Management Funds into entities associated with Mr Hubbard?

    We covered this matter in our third report dated 30 September 2010 (which is available on our website). There are substantial exposures of both Aorangi and Hubbard Management Funds to South Canterbury Finance and its parent Southbury Group Limited. Given the insolvency of both these companies, there is a high likelihood that the investments will be worthless.

  10. Why are you selling assets?

    Aorangi has a portfolio of first mortgage loans and other loans and investments primarily into farming operations. The commercial loans and first mortgages that Aorangi holds are being rolled over and refinanced in the normal course of business. Mr Hubbard has developed a four year plan to realise the Aorangi assets so the investors can be repaid. We are in negotiations with a number of the borrowers to refinance their loans in order that we can repay Aorangi investors. The investments into farming businesses, by their nature, do not produce a regular cash flow. We have dealt with this matter in each of our reports. Other shareholders and business partners in these farming businesses have approached us and are willing to buy Mr Hubbard’s interests. We are working to establish if these requests are an appropriate course of action. We are in negotiations with a number of parties and will report regularly on the status of these discussions. We will not be “fire” selling these interests.

    Hubbard Management Funds has sold a limited number of investments. These sales have been to take advantage of some good asset pricings and also to tidy up some very small investments relative to the overall fund. The primary purpose of these actions has been to obtain sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations to continually make payments to certain venture capital investments of the fund. If the fund does not make these payments the value of those investments will diminish significantly. Our actions have been to protect the value of the investments on behalf of the investors.

  11. We have an investment with Aorangi. We were advised it was a first registered mortgage. Why is our investment at risk?

    Some investors have provided us with authorities showing that they believed they had invested in first mortgage securities over the land. Other investors have provided us with correspondence suggesting a similar type of investment. We reported earlier that the nature of the investments was generally not first mortgage securities over land. The majority of the investments are in fact second mortgages, unsecured advances or are shares in certain businesses in farming operations. These investments carry far higher risks than a first ranking mortgage and some losses will be incurred.

  12. Who holds the shares and cash that are part of Hubbard Management Funds?

    The vast majority of the shares are held in the name of Hubbard Churcher Trust Management Limited which is in statutory management. The cash associated with Hubbard Management Funds is held by Forresters Nominee Company Limited (in statutory management). The reason for these two companies being placed into statutory management was to secure the assets for the benefit of the investors as they were not controlled by the Statutory Managers. Some investments are held in other entities. We are working to transfer these to Hubbard Churcher Trust Management Limited.

  13. Are the shares held in my own name?

    No, the shares are not held in the name of each investor. They are held globally on behalf of the fund, usually in the name of Hubbard Churcher Trust Management Limited.

  14. What is the current valuation of the Hubbard Management Fund portfolio?

    We have been providing an update in our reports on the current value of the Hubbard Management Fund portfolio.

    The graph below sets out the movements in the value of the Hubbard Management Funds portfolio and cash holdings.

    Hubbard Management Funds Portfolio Valuation

  15. What is my own position in Hubbard Management Funds? How much will I get back?

    The position of each investor in Hubbard Management Funds is unclear. If the fund has acted as a pool then each investor will get a pro-rata amount of what they have invested. Our current estimate is that on this basis investors would receive approximately 60% of their investment. This will alter as the portfolio value changes. If the fund is regarded as an individual portfolio then the returns are less certain. As we have noted in our reports, there are certain situations where there is inadequate shares and cash to match investor statements. We have undertaken a brief review of the positions of the investors on the assumption that each investor would get a share of each investment that is listed on their statements. It is concerning that some investors would suffer a large loss, whereas other investors would suffer only a very small loss. Because the variances in the returns will be considerably different for many investors, we will need to get court direction as to the best basis for allocation.

  16. Has Mr Hubbard pledged any of the assets that are owned for investor benefit?

    Our initial investigations indicate that there are shares owned by Hubbard Management Funds that appear to have been mortgaged or offered as security for other loans. These are at risk. We referred to this matter in our third report and indicated that the total value of these assets pledged as security is approximately $7.5m. This estimate has reduced to $4.5 million at 31 January 2011 as we have resolved some issues and the value of the shares subject to claims has changed.

  17. Was there $2.5 million available to Aorangi prior to 30 June 2010?

    We can confirm that at the time of our appointment $2.5 million was held in a solicitors trust account. Some days subsequent to our appointment these funds were transferred to our legal advisers trust account. Given we were appointed just a few days before the 30 June 2010 interest payment was due we did not have sufficient time to get a full understanding of the position of Aorangi and therefore it was prudent to place interest payments on hold. These funds were used, along with other funds received, to make the 3 cent capital repayment to investors in October 2010.

  18. Why has it been reported that the Statutory Managers have not worked closely with Mr Hubbard?

    In the early days of the process we engaged regularly with Mr Hubbard. Mr Hubbard’s legal advisers then required all questions to be filtered through them which slowed the process enormously. Additionally, Mr Hubbard was required to focus on the plans for South Canterbury Finance and therefore we needed to provide him with “space” to focus on this matter. We have now ceased placing requests via Mr Hubbard’s solicitors. We now meet regularly with Mr Hubbard to get his input on a range of matters.

  19. Why were there no previous indications that Aorangi could not meet its interest obligations?

    Mr Hubbard was able to mortgage his assets to raise funds to pay investors fully. At the time of our appointment there were a number of mortgage applications with solicitor nominee companies and banks. We are aware Mr Hubbard was borrowing personally from those he had previously supported to meet Aorangi interest payments. We have previously commented on the mismatch in funding and borrowings. The recent September and December quarter receipts have highlighted this as noted in our fourth and sixth reports. With such a mismatch an investor wishing to withdraw funds may experience delays. We have sighted correspondence where investors were not able to withdraw funds despite a number of requests.

  20. What assets does HMF hold and what has been sold?

    We can not generally disclose this information without running the risk of impacting the value of the investments. Our priority is to maximise the value of the fund. We have already seen the effect of the market anticipating (incorrectly) the sale of certain assets. This included a drop in the market share price in anticipation of surplus stock available for sale and a number of heavily discounted offers. As previously stated the Statutory Managers are not intending to sell any investments unless it complements the process of good management maximising fund value for its investors and maintaining appropriate spread and weighting of investments. We are not liquidating the fund but we are actively managing the fund.

  21. Pike River Coal Limited (PRC) has been placed in receivership. What is HMFs share holding in PRC?

    Hubbard Management Funds currently holds 1,100,000 shares in PRC. When Grant Thornton New Zealand became Statutory Managers back on 20 June 2010, the shareholding stood at 1,546,386, up from 1,398,445 shares held on 31 March 2010.

    As part of our active management of the fund we have sold down the holding by approximately 30% as the share price peaked in October and early November 2010. This was in response to our advisers’ considered opinion that the fund had excessive exposure to the resource sector.

  22. When is there going to be a further payment of Aorangi capital?

    We expect to make a payment by mid 2012, subject to the sale of assets identified by Mr Hubbard.

  23. If an investor with funds under statutory management were to ‘pass away’ what would happen to the money invested under that person’s name?

    The investment would transfer to their Estate. The investment would remain in the name of the Estate within either Aorangi or HMF.

  24. What legal responsibility do the Statutory Managers have to pay out the money to an estate? If there are legal expenses, who pays?

    An Estate would have the same status as all other investors. There would be no legal costs from the Statutory Managers’ solicitors associated with the transfer of an Aorangi or HMF investment to an Estate. The Statutory Managers would require evidence and direction from the Estate solicitors to make any transfers. This is likely to include a probated will. The process we would use is identical to the process used for the major share registries.

  25. What interest rate is used to calculate the interest on Aorangi investments?

    Systems are in place to calculate interest but as yet, no interest has been calculated. The rate used will most likely relate to the banks on-call rate or the 90 day bank bill rate as this data is easily available retrospectively.

  26. When will interest payments commence?

    We will repay capital first and will only calculate interest in the event of a surplus available to investors. Interest will not be calculated prior to the full repayment of capital, nor will we credit interest to any investors account earlier, as to do so may create taxable income for investors which may never be paid. Our current estimates which are set out in our sixth report, indicate it is unlikely any interest will be paid on funds invested in Aorangi.

  27. Do the Hubbards have access to funds to pay for legal advice?

    We have no further comment to make other than our 10 December 2010 statement.

  28. “We have been liaising, and continue to liaise, with Mr Hubbard's personal legal advisers. The Statutory Managers put a proposal for immediate legal support to Russell McVeagh during November 2010.

    The Statutory Managers are confident that appropriate arrangements would be made for Mr Hubbard's personal legal representation should he face charges from the Serious Fraud Office.”

    To make further comment at this time would not be appropriate as processes are being developed to handle the situation. You can, however, be assured that the Statutory Managers are working in the best interests of Mr Hubbard in this matter.

  29. Who is paying for Statutory Management - the Government or the investors?

    Presently, only Statutory Managers costs for Hubbard Management Funds (HMF) are coming from investor funds. Before Statutory Management was imposed Mr Hubbard charged investors an annual management fee of 1.5% on monies invested. To cover Statutory Management costs, we obtained a Court Order to have the fund cover the costs. This was on the basis that Mr Hubbard's usual annual management fee of about $1.2m ($80m x 1.5%) was not charged in December 2010 as had been his past practice.

  30. When will the next Statutory Managers report come out?

    The statutory managers have released two separate reports for Hubbard Management Funds and Aorangi Securities Limited Both reports will be placed on this website by 10 March 2011. The next report is expected to be issued by the end of June 2011.


Allan Hubbard Saga

Full SFO Statement on SCF Fraud Investigation

Hubbard Letter to Simon Power

Download Grant Thornton Report 1
Download Grant Thornton Report 2
Download Grant Thornton Report 3
Download Grant Thornton Report 4
Download Grant Thornton Report 5
Download Grant Thornton Report 6

Join the Put Allan Hubbard Away Facebook Group

Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard to Face Fraud Charges
Allan Hubbard Saga: Still Feral After All These Years
Allan Hubbard Saga: Sixth Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard looks set to cop a plea
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters Risk Legal Action
Allan Hubbard Saga: Mental Challenge
Allan Hubbard Saga: Hubbard Defiant in 2011
Book Review: Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time, by Virginia Green
Allan Hubbard Saga: VIDEO - Hubbard Biographer Virginia Green on TVNZ's Breakfast
Book Extract - Allan Hubbard: Man Out of Time
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 3, The Final Cut
Allan Hubbard Saga: Going Feral - Part 2
Allan Hubbard Saga: Paul Carruthers Goes Feral... Again
Allan Hubbard: The Biography
Allan Hubbard Saga: On Forged Signatures and Uncharitable Trusts
Allan Hubbard Saga: Evidence of Fraud now Clear
Allan Hubbard Saga: NBR VS the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: South Canterbury Finance to be investigated by the SFO
Allan Hubbard Saga: Third Grant Thornton Report
Allan Hubbard Saga: Will He Walk?
Allan Hubbard Saga: No Longer Bothered by Botherway
Allan Hubbard Saga: 60 Minutes Interview, Sept 23 2010
Allan Hubbard Saga: Supporters head to the exit door
Allan Hubbard Saga: Threats & the Mysterious PWC Report
Allan Hubbard Supporters: Conflict of Interest
VW Veneer reveals BMW heart
VIDEO: Jenni McManus Explains Allan Hubbard Collapse
Allan Hubbard Statement on SCF Receivership
VIDEO: Sandy Maier - full news conference on SCF Receivership
Market Alert: South Canterbury Finance to be placed in Receivership
Allan Hubbard: Ignorant Supporters Blissfully Unaware
Thornton Report 2: Allan Hubbard Guilty as Charged
Allan Hubbard: Full TV3 Interview - July 16 2010
Thornton Report 1: Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities
Bothered by Simon Botherway




c Share Investor 2011

Friday, September 3, 2010

VIDEO: Jenni McManus Explains Allan Hubbard Collapse







Source: NZI Business Sept 2: Fairfax Media briefing with Jenni Mc Mannus


Few people watch NZI business at 6.00am but I occasionally do when I am getting my little girl ready for daycare. This is worth a look if you want to get your brain around Allan Hubbard and his failure at South Canterbury Finance (SCF), Aorangi Securities, Hubbard Funds Management and other divisions of his former business.

Jenni explains the saga over Allan Hubbard and the goings on at his business empire better than anyone else.

Known for her dispassionate focus on facts in terms of business commentary and investigation Jenni zones in on the following key points:

1. Disclosure and transparency of the SCF loan book has always been a problem and a big issue for Jenni.

2. SCF strayed from its core lending under Hubbard. A big reason for his empire collpse.

3. Lachie Mcleod, former CEO of SCF, was lent $15 million to buy shares in SCF with no interest by one of Hubbard's investment vehicles - big questions as to whether this was typical of the lending practices of Hubbard's business interests.

4. Hubbard made decisions without board approval or indeed reference.

5. The statutory management process made clear what was going on all the time. The second Grant Thornton Report is an important document that reveals typical financial processes of the company; hidden loans, inter-party lending, ghost assets. Statutory management had no bearing on the collapse of SCF or any other part of the business.

6. Insufficient due diligence done on finance companies let into the Govt guarantee - well duh.


The probability is, after more poking around in balance sheets and records, that the kinds of loans made by Hubbard and associated companies that will be disclosed will reveal a litany of embarrassing and possibly fraudulent loans and the relevance of the Serious Fraud Office part will become very clear.

You would have to say though that Allan Hubbard isn't alone in his financial skulduggery. Auditors, accountants and advisers to Hubbard and his former business have questions to answer as the SFO case unravels and a further report from Grant Thornton comes latter on this month. What is clear at present is that Mr Hubbard needs to take the biggest responsibility for the failure as he was the head and CEO of SCF.

From this reading, supporters of Mr Hubbard appear to be chasing a dead dog that will lead to further embarrassment of the kind already heaped upon them from the mainstream media that previously supported their stance.

See Chris Lee for an interesting "inside" look.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Thornton Report 2: Allan Hubbard Guilty as Charged

In the ongoing saga of Allan Hubbard and his crumbling business empire there were further revelations yesterday when the second report from statutory managers Grant Thornton came out.

It appears that Mr Hubbard has been running his Hubbard Management Funds (HMF) business, Aorangi Securities and a number of other investment vehicles in a slack, fraudulent and underhanded manner. In those respects it makes him as bad as your Hotchins, Watsons, Bryers and their filthy thieving ilk.

On first look though, what appears different is that Hubbard looks to have been motivated by the "Robin Hood" factor. That is, he was using other peoples money to lend to those who "needed" it.

All very altruistic sounding at first glance but bound to end in tears when incoming funds and assets didn't match outgoings.

There have been claims made in the second report that Aorangi Securities has been borrowing money on call while lending the proceeds to second rate and overvalued farming assets, the bulk of which are connected to the Hubbards - nothing altruistic going on there.

Aorangi made interest free loans to a charitable trust that the Hubbards have a financial investment in and that trust was being charged 10% interest on those loans - very dodgy.

Investment values overstated by 25% in the Hubbard Management Funds business with $13 million of assets allocated to investors in the fund that apparently don't exist - looking very bad here.

An overstatement of cash at hand at HMF of more than $5.5 million.

Inter-party lending that advantages Mr Hubbard and his financial interests over his investors is a good indication that he was covering his own ass in the event of a meltdown.

Mr Hubbard's businesses all suffered from a lack of full detailed documentation.

It is clear now while Mr Hubbard did not set out to deliberately fleece investors as other finance company heads have over the last 3 years, Mr Hubbard is no saint.

I have until now largely reserved my judgement on Hubbard and his predicament but if you read the report you can come only to the conclusion that Hubbard has been a naughty boy and supporters need to take a good hard look at themselves if they wish to continue to back Mr Hubbard in the face of the reality of his offenses thus far revealed.

Yep, it isn't right that the other thieves out there have largely been untouched by authorities but the object of our interest here is Allan Hubbard and we now should wait for the additional detail that will come out from the Serious Fraud Office and the Statutory managers of Hubbard's business and personal financial dealings.


Related Share Investor Reading

Download Grant Thornton Report 1
Download Grant Thornton Report 2

Allan Hubbard: Full TV3 Interview - July 16 2010
Thornton Report: Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities
Whatever happened to? Muriel Dunn
Bothered by Simon Botherway
Allied Farmers: Prosecutions should be on the cards
Allied Farmers Fraud passes with little fanfare
Allied Farmers: What's it Worth?
Hanover, Allied Farmers deal more of the same
Jane Diplock Q & A Interview
Hanover's "White Knights" are really daylight robbers
Hanover collapse: It was just a matter of time
Money Managers Saga: 3 Story wrap
Money Managers gives First Step investors the middle finger
Greed is bad: Geneva Finance Folds
Financial 101: Learn before you leap
Kevin's Blog


Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Forum - Register free


From Fishpond.co.nz

Bird on a Wire: The Inside Story from a Straight Talking CEO

Buy Bird on a Wire: The Inside Story from a Straight Talking CEO & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


c Share Investor 2010

Friday, July 16, 2010

Thornton Report: Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities

I am not sure why Grant Thornton, the Statutory Manager of Allan Hubbard's Aorangi Securities, would be publicly releasing an interim report on Hubbard's company unless it provided a clear picture of what has been going on. It doesn't.

Best a complete investigation be done then publicly comment. Thornton's accusations have yet to be backed up by fact and while there maybe a basis for this investigation, parading it in the media before crossing the "I's" and dotting the "T's" isn't a wise move. Hubbards other business interests have and will be further affected by these claims

Having said that there are some serious issues that Mr Hubbard needs to address if true:

These are the main points Thornton has made:

1. Inter-party lending seems to have been rife with interest free loans flowing from charitable trusts to Hubbard business interests.

2. Security on some loans, while promised, seems to be missing in some cases.

3. Inadequate accounting systems


Many commentators have been calling for Mr Hubbard's neck in a noose over this but so far I haven't seen anything that would require he be run out of town. Not yet anyway.

Best they shut their mouths until the final report and any evidence is revealed.


Related Share Investor Reading


Download Grant Thornton Report

Whatever happened to? Muriel Dunn
Bothered by Simon Botherway
Allied Farmers: Prosecutions should be on the cards
Allied Farmers Fraud passes with little fanfare
Allied Farmers: What's it Worth?
Hanover, Allied Farmers deal more of the same
Jane Diplock Q & A Interview
Hanover's "White Knights" are really daylight robbers
Hanover collapse: It was just a matter of time
Money Managers Saga: 3 Story wrap
Money Managers gives First Step investors the middle finger
Greed is bad: Geneva Finance Folds
Financial 101: Learn before you leap
Kevin's Blog


Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Forum - Register free


From Fishpond.co.nz

Bird on a Wire: The Inside Story from a Straight Talking CEO

Buy Bird on a Wire: The Inside Story from a Straight Talking CEO & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


c Share Investor 2010