The Definition of Insanity

The definition of insanity is, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein

I have been mulling this opinion over for the last few months and think it is valid, simple and has a charming sort of 3rd form economics (14 yr old thinking for my foreign readers) approach to things.

Here goes.

Just what do Barrack Obama, Gordon Brown, Kevin Rudd and a whole host of other world leaders know that we don't?

I would argue, when it comes to the large sums of taxpayer dollars these imbeciles are doling out quicker than a rotund Wall Street banker in quicksand, that our leaders know very little indeed.

The answer to the Albert Einstein quandary is quite simple really and not as complex as those who dare to represent us might make out.

Why would one hand out very large sums of borrowed money to citizens to spend and "stimulate" economies when it is that very thing that got the globe and especially North America, in the proverbial in the first instance!

We must do the very opposite to this.

While not stopping spending entirely in the German or Japanese extreme, the answer to our current problems is to save.

Well duh !

Sufficient savings allows us to actually give us a real sense of wealth, rather than the plastic fantastic kind that contributed to this mess. That has to be paid back at some time and that time I would argue is now.

It is the same for individuals, business, large corporations and countries.

This is where reality and fantasy go in polar opposite directions and will probably have serious consequences somewhere else in the future.

What happens if you pile this much debt on top of debt to spend your way out of a problem caused by debt?

Well, eventually you have to pay that debt back.

So what Obama, Rudd, Brown et al are doing is postponing the inevitable and when that time comes the problem will be oh so more dire than it is currently.

Perhaps young Albert had something when he uttered those famous words that I posted above.

Here is another poignant ditty to end the lesson:

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction". Albert Einstein

Sorry for the complexity of my simplicity but it had to be said.


Recent Share Investor Reading

• United States Debt Crises: Is Warren Buffett Nuts?...
• Resmed takes market share from Fisher & Paykel Hea...
• Share Investor Portfolio 2: Value @ 5 August 2011
• Share Price Alert: The Entire NZX
• Heartland Bank NZ Ltd: A Good time to Buy?
• Collins Foods IPO

Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Forum


From Fishpond.co.nz - Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story





c Share Investor 2009

The $700 Billion Question: How much will the taxpayer bailout affect my investments?

I have been busy consumed with dirty politics over the last few weeks and haven't been writing much on investing. I cant help myself, these are interesting times in which we live.

I, like many of us, have been nervous about global economic problems and what that might mean to my investments.

I have a share portfolio, a house, a business, money in the bank and other financial interests that are going to be deleteriously affected by the fallout from the Sub-Prime meltdown.

Whatever your politics or attitude to investing, the US$ 700 billion taxpayer bailout of the US banking system is a necessary evil-I happen to be vehemently opposed to this kind of corporate welfare, but that is another story-we will suffer more economically if nothing is done.

So lets get to the point of this little rant.

Assuming the bailout will go ahead in a reasonably swift fashion, and it is likely to happen, how much impact will there be on your assets?

To be sure there is no free lunch when this size bailout is made, someone has to pay, in this case the American taxpayer digs deep and pays directly and the rest of the world will get caught in the fallout in a more indirect way.

$700 billion of extra debt for the biggest economy in the world means higher interest rates, higher gas, food and living costs and much, much more for the rest of us. All this unproductive spending means higher inflation, a slow down in the US economy, and a cut back by corporations-even outside the crippled financial sector-which will clearly have an impact on employment.

A decent recession is something we will have to look forward to and this will impact on asset classes of all kinds. When $700 billion is removed from an economy like that, your house, shares and business are going to be worth less.

Even though I am a long-term investor in all the assets that I hold, it is still hard to take the day to day devaluing of those assets.

I wrote a piece the other day about what companies you might consider buying during an economic slump of this kind and came to the conclusion that buying stocks in companies that sell day to day commodities or things that people will still use during a recession is a relatively safe bet.

I called it "The Monopoly Board" approach to investing, buy the eclectic, water and airport company monopolies and you will soon see your wealth increase.

Clearly shares in companies that sell widgets that are not essential are going to struggle during the coming downturn and as a result they ain't going to be worth as much.

If the bailout works and it probably will in the medium term, we will still need to hunker down and live a bit more frugally than we have been over the last 15 years or so.

Global economic growth was astounding in those years, assets increased in value multiple times and you shouldn't be surprised if your current assets lose half of their value before things get better. Even with a decrease of that nature we will still all be better off than we were at the beginning of this century.

Oh well, at least I still have my health.


Buy Toughen Up: What I've Learned About Surviving Tough Times



Toughen Up - Fishpond.co.nz



c Share Investor 2008