Showing posts with label National Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Party. Show all posts

Sunday, October 30, 2011

John Key - Speech to National Party Campaign Opening

Rt Hon John Key, Prime Minister & Leader of the National Party

Speech to National Party Campaign Opening

Sky City Convention Centre, Auckland

Ladies and Gentlemen, fellow National Party members,

I'm proud to be launching National's campaign for the 2011 election.

It's an election where the stakes for New Zealand are high.

And you are an important part of it.

All of us have a role to play in this election, whether it's door knocking, putting up hoardings, posting flyers, driving people to the polls, or any of the hundreds of jobs that need to be done between now and November 26.

And we all have to be at the top of our game, because election campaigns are tough, and there is no room at all for complacency.

We need to be out there every day, selling our case.

For each of the next 27 days until the election, I will be out there talking about our plan for a brighter future and I want you to join me in doing that.

You can be assured that your MPs and candidates are working tirelessly to get our message across.

And what a great team we have.

Today I want to acknowledge their efforts and look forward to them joining me on the stage at the end of my speech.

In the end, this election is going to come down to two things.

First, it's about who can provide strong, stable leadership in difficult and uncertain times.

The world remains a turbulent place.

The images we see on our televisions from Europe and the United States remind us that strong political leadership is absolutely vital.

National has shown over the last three years that we can deliver strong and stable government in what have been very difficult times.

We've shown that we can work constructively with a number of other parties in Parliament to get things done for the benefit of New Zealand.

And the alternative is too awful to think about - a directionless, Labour-led government without a real plan to deal with these critical times.

Instead, all they have is a formula for more borrowing, more spending, more tax, and some vague notion of paying it off in the never-never. They would also impose big new costs on business.

That would be a recipe for disaster, just as New Zealand is starting to grow again and bedding in the economic recovery.

Which brings me to the second key factor in the election - who has the most credibility when it comes to the economy.

That's vitally important because when we talk about the economy we really mean our economy.

We are all a part of it.

Our economy keeps firms in business, people in their jobs, and families in their homes; it pays for medicines and health care, educates our kids, and pays our Super when we're older.

So whether a party has economic credibility or not has very real consequences for very real people.

National has a straightforward and comprehensive plan to build a more competitive, stronger economy.

We're balancing the books sooner by getting back to surplus in three years.

That means less debt and lower interest rates for households and businesses.

We're creating incentives for people to work hard, save and get ahead, through changes to tax and welfare.

And we're building better roads, broadband and other infrastructure so New Zealand businesses can grow.

Through these actions, we're creating a more competitive economy and backing Kiwis' ability to get out there and take on the world.

That means a more export-focused economy with more jobs for our kids.

And it means we can have better frontline services in health and education, stay strong on crime, and get on with the job of rebuilding Christchurch.

That's our plan, and what I can promise you this election is a continuation of that plan.

It's working, despite the difficult circumstances we've all endured over the last few years, including a recession in 2008, the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression, and the devastating series of earthquakes that hit Canterbury and destroyed whole parts of Christchurch.

182 people died in the earthquake on 22 February this year and our thoughts remain with the families and friends of all the victims.

I know it's been a difficult time for New Zealanders over the last few years.

We've had more than our fair share of adversity, and we've all been tested during this time.

But difficult times are when sound, stable and responsible government matters more than ever.

Faced with challenges, the National-led Government set about dealing with them in a measured and balanced way.

We supported New Zealanders through the recession, while at the same time putting in place measures to halt the rapid growth in government debt.

We undertook the biggest overhaul of the tax system in 25 years.

We cut personal tax, company tax, and taxes on savings; increased taxes on consumption and property investment; and closed a lot of loopholes and opportunities for tax avoidance.

We tightened our belt, and reprioritised billions of dollars towards front-line services in areas like health and education.

We put aside money to fund the government's share of Christchurch reconstruction.

And we took a number of steps to increase genuine national savings.

The results are already starting to show.

The economy has grown in eight of the nine quarters since our first Budget was delivered, despite the earthquakes and the lingering impact of the global recession.

Interest rates have fallen to 45 year lows.

Households this year will have a positive savings rate for the first time in nearly a decade.

Exporters have been getting very good prices for what they produce and our trade with Asia is booming.

The important thing is that ordinary New Zealanders have benefited from this recovery, even though it hasn't always been easy.

43,000 jobs were created last year.

Wages in the pocket have been rising faster than prices.

And the Government has been able to deliver better public services, with a focus on results.

Hospitals are performing 27,000 more elective procedures each year, with more frontline doctors and nurses. Emergency dept and cancer waiting times are down. And we're making visits to after-hours clinics free for children under six.

We've passed 18 new laws to clamp down on illegal behaviour. We've taken a much tougher line with boy racers, sentencing, parole and bail. We've clamped down on gangs and P, and we've given the Police more tools to do their job.

Crime is down in every region of the country.

We've invested heavily in infrastructure projects that will help deliver a brighter future, like new State highways, rolling out ultra-fast broadband, and upgrading the rail network.

National has delivered for New Zealanders in difficult times.

And what does the future hold?

You know what you'll be getting under National because it's largely set out in the Treasury's independent pre-election analysis - the PREFU.

This shows the budget deficit reducing significantly over the next two years before we run a $1.5 billion surplus in 2014/15.

After that we will be paying off debt, while other countries continue to borrow.

The economy is expected to grow at an average of three per cent a year over the next four years, with 170,000 more jobs than at the time of the Budget.

Unemployment will fall steadily to below 5 per cent.

Wages will continue to rise.

Interest rates will remain low.

And the government will continue to invest in high-quality public services.

That's pretty good, but I actually think we can do better than this.

There are huge opportunities out there for New Zealand.

We are a food-producing country in a world that is demanding more food.

Our trade is increasingly shifting towards Asia - the most vibrant economic region in the world.

A growing middle class in China, India and across the continent is tuning in to the goods and services New Zealand can supply.

I'm unashamedly positive for New Zealand. I think we've got a great future ahead of us.

But we need to get out and seize that future - it won't come delivered on a plate.

No-one owes New Zealand a living - we have to earn it.

That's why it's so important to create a more competitive economy.

An economy where businesses have the confidence to invest, expand, and take on new staff.

And an economy where we sell more of what the world wants to buy.

However, the world comes with challenges too.

The global environment is full of uncertainties and the Treasury has highlighted the European debt crisis as a major risk to the world economy.

That makes it even more important to have a strong, stable government at the helm.

So that is what National has to offer this election:

� strong, stable government, with a great team of Ministers and MPs

� sound, proven economic management that builds off our progress over the last three years

� and a positive vision for New Zealand , where the dividends of growth are seen in jobs, wages and better public services.

The alternative is Labour.

Where do I start?

Labour is a party without a plan.

Instead, they have a collection of election gimmicks and slogans, like GST off bananas, all of which would come with a hefty price tag.

Together these would create a $16 billion hole in the government's accounts over the next 4 years alone - and far more over the longer term - which would have to be funded through borrowing.

Labour knows that.

So they have suddenly decided that every New Zealander can work another two years longer, to pay for some of their spending spree.

Even then, their numbers are a long way from adding up, because their retirement changes don't start having a significant effect for at least 15 years.

Where does that leave us?

Labour would simply borrow more, spend more, tax more, and impose more costs on every business in the country.

And now they now want to push back everyone's well-earned retirement.

Why would you vote for that?

Why would you vote for a party that thinks the answer to a global debt crisis is more debt?

It just doesn't make sense.

But it's certainly true to form.

When Labour was last in government they increased their spending by 50 per cent in only five years.

In Opposition, they have opposed every piece of spending restraint we've introduced.

Yes, every one.

And now their election promises consist of - you guessed it - more spending.

And when it comes to loading costs onto business, they are in a league of their own.

A big increase in the minimum wage, a compulsory KiwiSaver policy that hugely ramps up costs to employers, a new capital gains tax on all businesses, a more expensive ETS, an irrigation tax on farmers, more transport taxes, and a1970s industrial relations policy - all of these would add up to big cost increases for the 500,000 businesses in New Zealand.

That's seven big, extra costs on business.

Businesses, both big and small, have only a few ways to meet these sorts of costs - reduce wages, cut jobs, increase prices or simply shut up shop altogether.

This is not the future I want for my kids - and I know you don't want it either.

Let's face it - Labour just does not understand how businesses work.

I know, and you know, that the only way people get jobs, and wage rises, is when someone is prepared to put money and time into their business, seek out new opportunities and grow.

Through the promises it's made, Labour is telling those people not to bother.

Well I am far more optimistic than Mr Goff.

I back New Zealanders to get ahead.

But we have to give them the right environment to operate in, and a platform from which they can compete with the best in the world.

That only happens when we think carefully about things like taxes, and about regulations, and about the overall flexibility of the economy.

And it only happens when we keep debt low, invest in modern infrastructure and encourage savings.

That last point is what I want to talk more about this afternoon - keeping debt low, investing in modern infrastructure, and encouraging savings.

Because that's precisely what our extension of the mixed-ownership model is all about.

As I go around New Zealand and talk to people, I find they increasingly understand what we're planning to do with the mixed-ownership model.

They understand that we already have a living, breathing example of mixed ownership in Air New Zealand, which has been operating under this model for almost a decade.

They understand that the government will retain a majority stake in Meridian, Mighty River, Genesis and Solid Energy, so we'll never lose control.

They know these companies provide an opportunity for New Zealand savers who are looking for somewhere to put their savings, and not in housing or finance companies.

And they understand that by extending the mixed-ownership model to these companies, the Government will free up $5 to $7 billion for reinvesting in new and valuable assets, without having to borrow.

Today I am announcing how this reinvestment will happen.

If re-elected, National will put the proceeds of mixed ownership - which, as I said, will be between $5 and $7 billion - into a new Fund, called the Future Investment Fund.

The Future Investment Fund will be used to buy new assets on behalf of New Zealanders, and to upgrade and modernise our existing assets.

The new projects I am talking about here are things like major hospital redevelopments, new schools, and transport projects.

They will result in assets that are long-lived, are here in New Zealand, and are owned by the Crown on behalf of all taxpayers.

We will set a high bar for projects to be funded out of the Future Investment Fund and the case for these projects will have to stack up.

They will have to deliver substantial social or economic dividends for New Zealanders.

Decisions on spending from the Fund will be made on a case-by-case basis, by ministers, as part of the normal Budget process.

We intend the Fund to run for at least five Budgets, but this of course depends on how much the mixed ownership model raises. The higher the proceeds, the more new investment we can pay for without having to borrow.

We will be very transparent about the proceeds that go into the Future Investment Fund and very transparent about what assets are being paid for out of the Fund.

In this way, the public can be assured that the proceeds of mixed ownership are not being lost.

Far from it - the money we raise from mixed ownership will be used, in its entirety, to pay for valuable new assets that will benefit New Zealanders for many years to come.

And because we will have the money already there in a Fund, we don't need to go out and borrow that money from overseas lenders, increase our debt, and pay higher interest payments offshore.

Today I am also announcing the first project to come out of the Future Investment Fund.

The first priority for the Fund is education.

We are putting aside $1 billion of the Fund, over the next five years, to modernise and transform New Zealand schools.

That's because the environment in which teachers teach, and kids learn, is hugely important.

But kids across New Zealand go to schools that are as different as chalk and cheese.

Some kids go to very modern, new schools.

I've been lucky enough to visit some of these schools, like Albany Junior and Senior High Schools in my own electorate.

These schools don't look anything like the ones most of us went to.

A time-traveller from the 1960s wouldn't even recognise them as schools.

For a start, they are not made up of rectangular, one-teacher, single-class classrooms, with 25 desks all in lines and a blackboard - or whiteboard - at the front.

They are built in a very modern way, to support modern teaching methods and modern technology.

Typically, they are built around what are called 'flexible teaching spaces'.

These are open plan areas with breakout rooms coming off them. The whole area can easily be reconfigured and used in a variety of ways.

This sort of space gives teachers the flexibility to teach small groups of students, or larger groups sharing resources with multiple teachers.

And they are designed to enable teachers and students to make far better use of technology than is possible anywhere else.

Other kids go to more traditional schools that nevertheless have built new teaching areas.

But most kids go to schools that were built during the post-war baby boom, or even before that. In fact 60 per cent of New Zealand schools are over 50 years old.

They weren't designed for new technology, quite obviously, and they weren't designed to support modern teaching methods.

What is more, quite a number of school buildings are either earthquake risks or are leaky.

The point here is that kids will struggle to learn in a poor environment.

So our goal is to ensure that as much as possible, all schools, whatever their age, can provide the same learning opportunities as new schools.

That will be a long-term project, stretching out 10 years and beyond.

And it will require a considerable investment.

As things stand now, the existing money for school building projects will be needed simply to maintain the existing school network and to help address health and safety issues like earthquake proofing and leaky buildings.

And to do anything more would require borrowing.

So we are going to take $1 billion from the Future Investment Fund and put it towards accelerating our "21st Century Schools" building programme.

This programme will cover the next five years and involves:

� building new, modern schools

� rejuvenating existing schools on the same site

� building new, modern teaching areas in existing schools

� and wiring up many more schools with fibre, to take advantage of ultra-fast broadband.

All these new schools and all these new teaching areas will be built as modern learning environments and incorporate flexible teaching spaces.

They will all be set up to accommodate the latest technology.

And because we'll be relieving a lot of pressure from the rest of the school building budget, there will be more resources available for smaller rebuilding and redesign projects, which again will involve modern designs and modern technology.

So the $1 billion we are contributing from the Fund is a very big investment in schools and therefore in the future of our kids.

It will allow us to increase the total amount spent on school building projects each year by more than 50 per cent.

That level of investment would not be possible without the mixed ownership model.

Our 21st Century school building programme is also bolstered by the Government's major investment in ultra-fast broadband.

All schools will be connected to ultra-fast broadband over the next five years.

At the same time, we're wiring up the inside of schools with fibre so they can connect with the new broadband network.

And the next step is to develop a dedicated on-line network for all New Zealand schools.

I'm pleased to announce that the Government has agreed to fund the development of this network. It will be called the Network for Learning and it will go live in 2013.

Schools will be able to access this network once they are wired up for ultra-fast broadband.

Our Network for Learning will enable schools to access learning resources on line, connect with other schools across the country and around the world, and allow teaching to be delivered at a distance, for example to students in rural schools.

It will ensure that teaching and learning in New Zealand reflects modern educational methods and makes the most of new technology.

With over 2,500 schools and more than 800,000 users, it will be the biggest network of its kind in the country.

Taken together, our 21st Century building programme, ultra-fast broadband, and the new Network for Learning, will give our kids learning opportunities that are second to none in the world.

Ladies and Gentlemen, fellow National Party members:

Make no mistake - New Zealanders have a very clear choice this election.

They can choose to go forward with a strong, stable National-led government and build on the last three years.

A National government that stands for a prosperous, safe and ambitious New Zealand, where all Kiwis have the opportunities to get ahead under their own steam, no matter where they are born or what their parents do.

Or they can stop, and then head backwards, with a negative Labour Party that wants to borrow more, spend more, tax more, put more costs on business, and push back everyone's well-earned retirement.

Personally, I think New Zealanders are aspirational for their future.

That's why I'm asking them to give their party vote to National on November 26.

Let's get out there and win that election.


* Please note I would have posted the labour opening speech but there isn't going to be one.


Think Bigger


Darren Rickard 2011





Monday, February 14, 2011

The Case for State Asset Sales

Originally posted @ Share Investor Blog

Much has been written over the last month since the National Party announced its policy to partially sell State Electricity assets should they win the November 26 election and most of it the typical rantings of those commentators from the left and those politicians from the same place that are scaremongering for political gain.


If we look at the facts before us though, in terms of the economic fortunes of New Zealand we are in a dire situation.

These are the main points of the National Party Policy:

  • The Government would have to maintain a majority controlling stake by owning more than 50 per cent of the company.
  • New Zealand investors would have to be at the front of the queue for shareholdings, and we would have to be confident of widespread and substantial New Zealand share ownership.
  • The companies involved would have to present good opportunities for investors.
  • The capital freed up would have to be used on behalf of taxpayers to fund new public assets and thereby reduce the pressure on the Government to borrow.
  • The Government would have to be satisfied that industry-specific regulations adequately protected New Zealand consumers.

Very specific guidelines for a sale process that do not mention full sales.

We have very high debt levels, both personally and publicly and this debt is a heavy weight on out present and future economic stability.

We owe almost as much as we own and borrowing and interest costs are currently having a big impact on us, with the State borrowing NZ$300 million a week and individuals still borrowing and servicing their own debt.

This impact will have long term effects if we do not do anything to either pay down more debt, cut spending or drastically cut both. Nobody would attempt to do the latter, apart from the most rabid right wingers so we have to do something right?

Absolutely is the unequivocal answer.

While I would be happy to sell non-essential assets to the State like schools, hospitals, airlines, banks and many other under-performing state monopolies, the National Party are only considering selling partial minority stakes in 4 electricity companies to Mum and Dad investors -hardly a sell-down of the family silver!

The control of those assets remains in the hands of the State on behalf of all of us, so it shouldn't be a problem to the left who have championed the same sort of sell-down of Air New Zealand Ltd [AIR.NZX] that happened under Labour nearly 10 years ago, so the current opposition seems at the very least sour grapes that the left are not in power and at the most hypocritical to the extreme.

The proceeds from a sell down of 49% stakes in the 4 remaining state power companies should go to paying down debt, there are indications that Government want to use the cash freed up to buy other assets for the State but that would clearly be a mistake given the poor quality of management of State assets under any political party.

The sell-down will also encourage prospective small Mum and Dad investors to invest in good companies based in New Zealand rather than putting money into dead end stuff like term investments, private real estate or investing money overseas.

The vast proportion of Kiwisaver money and money invested in various New Zealand superannuation schemes is currently invested offshore and that clearly needs to change.

We need to invest in ourselves, promote a savings culture based on our own assets and the National Party proposal ticks all those positive boxes.

To scaremonger by saying this policy is one based on failed models of the 1980s and 1990s is simply that and is not based on fact at all but a political agenda and lack of economic education, business skills and a determination and political ethos that will have us stuck with the debt we have now for generations to come.

We need to take politics out of this and take a good hard look at the merits based on fact.


Recent Share Investor Reading


Discuss this Topic @ Share Investor Forum


From Fishpond.co.nz



Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz





c Share Investor & Darren Rickard 2011


Bookmark and Share

The Case for State Asset Sales

Much has been written over the last month since the National Party announced its policy to partially sell State Electricity assets should they win the November 26 election and most of it the typical rantings of those commentators from the left and those politicians from the same place that are scaremongering for political gain.

If we look at the facts before us though, in terms of the economic fortunes of New Zealand we are in a dire situation.

These are the main points of the National Party Policy:

  • The Government would have to maintain a majority controlling stake by owning more than 50 per cent of the company.
  • New Zealand investors would have to be at the front of the queue for shareholdings, and we would have to be confident of widespread and substantial New Zealand share ownership.
  • The companies involved would have to present good opportunities for investors.
  • The capital freed up would have to be used on behalf of taxpayers to fund new public assets and thereby reduce the pressure on the Government to borrow.
  • The Government would have to be satisfied that industry-specific regulations adequately protected New Zealand consumers.

Very specific guidelines for a sale process that do not mention full sales.

We have very high debt levels, both personally and publicly and this debt is a heavy weight on out present and future economic stability.

We owe almost as much as we own and borrowing and interest costs are currently having a big impact on us, with the State borrowing NZ$300 million a week and individuals still borrowing and servicing their own debt.

This impact will have long term effects if we do not do anything to either pay down more debt, cut spending or drastically cut both. Nobody would attempt to do the latter, apart from the most rabid right wingers so we have to do something right?

Absolutely is the unequivocal answer.

While I would be happy to sell non-essential assets to the State like schools, hospitals, airlines, banks and many other under-performing state monopolies, the National Party are only considering selling partial minority stakes in 4 electricity companies to Mum and Dad investors -hardly a sell-down of the family silver!

The control of those assets remains in the hands of the State on behalf of all of us, so it shouldn't be a problem to the left who have championed the same sort of sell-down of Air New Zealand Ltd [AIR.NZX] that happened under Labour nearly 10 years ago, so the current opposition seems at the very least sour grapes that the left are not in power and at the most hypocritical to the extreme.

The proceeds from a sell down of 49% stakes in the 4 remaining state power companies should go to paying down debt, there are indications that Government want to use the cash freed up to buy other assets for the State but that would clearly be a mistake given the poor quality of management of State assets under any political party.

The sell-down will also encourage prospective small Mum and Dad investors to invest in good companies based in New Zealand rather than putting money into dead end stuff like term investments, private real estate or investing money overseas.

The vast proportion of Kiwisaver money and money invested in various New Zealand superannuation schemes is currently invested offshore and that clearly needs to change.

We need to invest in ourselves, promote a savings culture based on our own assets and the National Party proposal ticks all those positive boxes.

To scaremonger by saying this policy is one based on failed models of the 1980s and 1990s is simply that and is not based on fact at all but a political agenda and lack of economic education, business skills and a determination and political ethos that will have us stuck with the debt we have now for generations to come.

We need to take politics out of this and take a good hard look at the merits based on fact.


Recent Share Investor Reading


Discuss this Topic @ Share Investor Forum


From Fishpond.co.nz

Every Bastard Says No: The 42 Below Story

Buy Every Bastard Says No - The 42 Below Story, by Geoff Ross & Justine Troy & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond



c Share Investor 2011

Monday, June 1, 2009

National's Budget like watching paint dry, Labour's would have led to economic disaster

Just looking back on Thursday's budget.

It wasn't really my cup of tea because it didn't cut back on spending enough. 

Lets face it it was politically safe and boring to the max -just what Key and Co need to be elected for a further term.

What was needed though was a massive cut back in the 10s of billions of wasteful social spending over the last ten years that got us in the current mess. Working for families, free money for students and that ridiculous "Gold Card" for seniors that will cost us dearly in the future amoungst other brain dead spending. We simply cannot afford these things.

Nobody got anything in the budget except another unaffordable socialist bribe, the home insulation scheme - stop insulating yourself with my money, keep yourself bloody warm!

We didn't get back the high taxes we paid over the last ten years either. Tax cuts were cut.
A really dumb move practically because we all know tax cuts stimulate economies more than any other tool but a good move politically because it looks like Bill English "cares" about the public purse.

As bitter as a  National Party 2009 budget is to swallow, one doesn't have to broaden ones imagination too far to surmise how much worse the budget would be under a Helen Clark Labour Government.

We would have had more of the same that we had under the last 10 years - Phil Goff has confirmed that many times over the last 8 months by reiterating we should be spending money we don't have. Taxes would have gone up instead of being just cut, we would have borrowed and spent our Children and Grandchildren's economic livelihood like Kevin Rudd, Barrack Obama, Gordon Brown and a number of other brain dead socialist morons around the world have over the last 8 months and interference from our Government would be more akin to a Stalinist regime only seen in North Korea.

We must remember the gleeful way Micheal Cullen gloated to National before the 2008 election that he had spent all our money, there was nothing left in the cupboard -"eat that!" to get a grip on where we would have gone from 2008 to 2011.

The man should be shot as treasonous for doing that but imagine his tax and spend regime under an economy in recession rather than the booming one that he inherited.

Yep, the 2009 Budget was boring but it is just what we need at a time like this, the alternative Labour Budget would have given us the Icelandic economic chills and brought us to our knees in short time.

At least with National we have a chance.

c Political Animal 2009


Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Key's whirlwind continues

What has taken all previous MMP governments weeks to organise has taken John Key less than a week.


He has announced his new government this morning even before officially being sworn in as Prime Minister.

Prime Minister elect John Key has announced the formation of a National-led centre-right government.

Act won five seats on election night and along with United Future, which won one, pledged to support National, meaning National's haul of 59 seats assured it a majority in the incoming 122-member Parliament.But Mr Key's successs in signing up the Maori Party means National could command 70 votes on confidence and supply issues.

Mr Key's formal inking of the deals paves the way for him to announce his Cabinet tomorrow and for him and his ministers to be sworn in on Wednesday.

That will allow Mr Key to fly out on Thursday to the Apec summit in Peru at the weekend as New Zealand's new Prime Minister. More

Not bad for a Prime Minister who was called a "politician with training wheels" by former Labour leader Helen Clark.

This caps Keys meteoric rise in Parliament from MP just six years ago to one of New Zealands youngest and most qualified individuals to take the position of Prime Minister.


c Political Animal 2008

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

But wait there's more!

The New Zealand election is over, we have got the desired result(for most of us anyway) so it is back to writing on my first love; money, business, finance and all that jazz.

Naturally my first piece back from writing at Political Animal is tinged with more than a little politics.

Sorry!

If you think New Zealand has seen the worst of its economic slowdown think again.

Currently New Zealand is suffering a recession brought on by profligate spending by our previous Finance Minister, Michael Cullen. Problems related to the credit squeeze have only just started to hit us and will reach their worst probably sometime mid 2009.

Some of the symptoms of the outgoing Labour Governments spending so far are; higher inflation, rising unemployment, a massive public deficit, lower spending on every level of consumer goods, high interest rates, low productivity, lower property prices, higher mortgage defaults and business failures, amongst other things.

These factors are set to get worse as we move into the New Year, save the higher interest rates, and clearly this is going to have a highly negative effect on the New Zealand stockmarket.

With the current NZX index at 2800, it is likely to go below 2000 points before it starts to get any better, probably towards the end of 2009 to early 2010.

Of course all the finer points of timing for recovery and or a worsening of the scenario outlined above hinge on what responses John Key's new Government makes to the current recession and whether it looms for longer or deeper.

The economic situation for our trading partners is also an important factor for any export led recovery and obviously the seriousness or otherwise of the global slowdown will have an impact and that impact we have largely yet to see.

Wasteful spending clearly needs cutting back in all areas of Government and the savings returned to taxpaying citizens via more tax cuts, this way the economy will be stimulated over and above any initiatives to speed the economy up via Government attached incentives or direct spending by them.

More of what we had from the Labour Party just isn't going to cut the mustard. Economies are best stimulated directly by citizens rather than by bureaucrats or politicians looking to spend taxpayer dosh on their favourite business charity.

Government spending on essential infrastructure is one notable exception.

New power stations, motorways in Auckland-another harbour crossing, a motorway through Mt Albert to finish the city's motorway system-and some decent school buildings would be a good start.

Any continuation of what got us in this mess in the first place will simply drag out out the recession for several years, rather than the likely 18 months or so.

Particular importance should placed on the speed and timing of the building blocks that must be put in place for us to start to grow the economy again.

A quick response is the best response and any impediment to economic development must be put aside so as to assist an economy that could get alot worse.

This means a fast tracking of a relaxing of the Resource Management Act and the immediate rescinding of the Emissions trading scheme, which will hamper economic growth by piling unnecessary cost into the economy when we least need it.

New Zealand finally has an administration that has the expertise to negotiate their way through financial management for the good and bad times.

New Zealand has made a choice by electing a new Government and our elected leaders must make the right economic choices, some of them difficult, in order for us to prosper again, sooner rather than latter.

The alternative is a continued slide down the economic ladder which will be extremely difficult to extricate ourselves from.


c Share Investor 2008

Saturday, November 8, 2008

National wins 2008 New Zealand Election

National have won by a large margin in the 2008 New Zealand Election on November 8 2008.


There was a big swing towards John Key and the National Party election night and the momentum that began weeks before election day continued as Key's party swept away the opposition Labour Party and its leader Helen Clark.

Winston Peters has finally gone from Parliament and Helen Clark is now looking for a position as a lecturer at AUT.

The big negative affect on the result was the pre-election dirt digging by Labour,the continued intervention of the Nanny State in Kiwi's lives and the poor management of the economy by Michael Cullen.

Rodney Hides yellow jacket worked for him and he managed a better result than 2005.

A good result for common sense, a good result for National, and a great result for New Zealand for the future.

Helen Clark gave the concession phone call after 99% of the vote was counted.

c Political Animal 2008






Monday, August 4, 2008

Its ours, but can we get rid of it already?


Customer service comes with paddle included.


What is all the fuss over national wanting to sell that monstrous failure Kiwibank.

They said they were not going to sell any Taxpayer "assets" in the their first term and they wont.

Will they sell it should they get a second?

Who cares.

The architect of this black hole for more taxpayer funds, Jim Anderton, says most Kiwis don't want it sold.
Really?

Then why are there only 500,000 low value customers then?

Kiwibank has been a drain on the taxpayer for 7 years now. It has been propped up by an initial NZ$125 million injection of taxpayer money, then subsidised by that other great sucker of taxpayer funds the highly inefficient NZ Post.


Typical customer service at a Kiwibank

Its minute "profit" in 2006 and 2007 was creatively accounted to make Anderton look good.

Its CEO Sam Knowles was at the Bank of New Zealand to "fix it up" after it collapsed under Labour's watch in 1990 and then was one of those overseeing the collapse of Databank.

Lets face it the lending book of Kiwibank is high risk and poor quality, much of it revolves around beneficiaries, the low paid and State involvement through taxpayer subsidised or sponsored home loans.

Kiwibank is a high risk possibility in the future for it to go under,taking our taxpayer money with it.

Lets sell it for what we can get for it.






Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Labour pollaxed by public opinion

Just a commentary about polls and what they might mean.

Now Labour have been trailing National in the polls since around October/November 2007. A perfect storm of sorts hit the lefties then, when their moralistic finger pointing over the Electoral Finance Act and anti smacking law backfired and coincided to piss off even their own deluded voters.

The first big swing to National showed an almost 20 point lead over Labour with a lower polling for John Key as most preferred leader and several polls since then have showed more or less the same results, except John Key is now the most preferred Prime Minister.

There has been one poll that had pegged the National lead back to around 10 points but it is the trend in the polls that needs to be taken into account. The trend is clearly in favour of a National Government, by a country mile.

In the months since, Labour have accepted secret donations, denied their part in rising costs to families and had major parts of state run departments like Education, Health and policing limp from crises to crises.

In addition, last month the private property rights of New Zealand and foreign shareholders in Auckland International Airport were trampled on when retrospective law, which this administration is fond of passing when it suits their socialist agenda, blocked them from selling their shares.

Just yesterday, Labour sunk more than NZ$ 600 million taxpayer dollars, with billions more to come, into an inefficient,loss making railroad company because they think it will buy them votes in November.

Who said our economy was struggling?

These additions to Labour's poor track record are going to will no doubt swing polls even wider. In National's favour.

Even though Labour are going to try and buy the 2008 election, as they did during the 2005 spend-fest, and with stolen taxpayer money no less, it is looking like a right royal massacre for Labour come polling day.

Related Political Animal reading

Labour first to break own Electoral law
Sign the anti smacking petition


c Political Animal 2008

Sunday, February 24, 2008

John Key gives good Facebook?

Photo c John Key, Facebook, 2008

According to Madonna, Bette Davis gave good face, will John
Key on Facebook?




Johnny Key has joined Facebook, to get some facetime with the voting age yoof who would normally vote for a leftie government. 10 people joined up while I was!

A good move by John, should have been made ages ago but never mind.

Contributers, watch what you say OK? the Electoral Finance Act is peeking over your shoulder.

Labour party hacks, please stay off it unless you have something sensible and erudite to say.


Related Political Animal reading

Electoral Finance Bill: The purpose is clear
Victim of Electoral Finance act forced to shut down website
John Key's Facebook page


c Political Animal 2008

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Desperation by Labour Backfires

Image result for useless labour party 2007 nz

The New Zealand Labour Party is desperate.

2o points down in the polls, an all-time low against this National Opposition, Labour Ministers mired in scandal and political stuff-ups and the Prime Minister Helen Clark and her underlings are in full filth mode trying to dig dirt on John Key. If serious accusations are to be found true then any politician must be harangued , it just so happens that none of the accusations placed at the feet of Key are serious or truthful

While New Zealands financial and political security and economy is on the brink of collapse and looking like it will consume this government and the country with it, all Labour are interested in is hanging onto power any way they can.

Scurrilous accusations have been made against John Key which haven't stuck and in fact they have indeed backfired on the detritus that have pointed the wagging fingers. What is that phrase again about glass houses and stones?

The energy being put in by Labour to discredit the National Opposition would be better used to govern the nation out of its present sliding fortunes. On second thoughts it might be better for NZ inc if Labour didn't try to "help" us, things always get worse when they intervene!

To simply ignore the mayhem surrounding them though is a crime that should be punished by an early election and a solid beating of the government reminiscent of what David Benson Pope used to dish out to his pupils while he was a teacher at a Tauranga High School.

Labours thrust at another term in office has them ignoring the basic issues a government is elected to do. We have the highest interest rates in the developed world, hospitals unable to cope with patients, finance companies losing almost $2 Billion dollars so far, government Ministers and bureaucrats involved in corruption and cover-ups, crime at at an all-time high, education standards slipping, record numbers of Kiwis leaving the country while questionable immigrants flood in unabated and a continuing lust to curb our freedoms by Labours lap dogs in parliament, Winston Peters, Sue Bradford and the usual hangers on.

Perhaps the biggest lunge at power lust by Labour is the introduction of a a contentious bill to parliament that will make it almost impossible for detractors of the Government to criticise them or use money in an election year to advocate against them or for an individual or party that one supports. That includes blogs such as this one. (I will not remain silent though dear readers)

The Electoral Finance Bill would curb advertising by political parties from January 1 of an election year that would cap their electoral spending, while government advertising on programmes like KiwiSaver would be uncapped and able to continue unrestrained. This advantage would also apply to Labour supported interest groups such as left backed organisations like the PPTA and other unions.

This kind of introduced legislation-it hasn't been passed yet-is the kind of law that would be passed by jurisdictions such as Mugabe's Zimbabwe , Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and Hitler's Germany.

The successful passing of this bill and its repercussions on democracy cannot be understated. The main purpose of the bill is to shut down free debate and the ability of the silent majority to elect an alternative government, whatever colour that government might be. It cannot be allowed to pass and any individual in parliament who votes for it must surely hang their heads in shame and perhaps think of packing their bags for a seat in Zimbabwe's Governing dictatorship. Clearly those who vote for such individuals must also question their motives for doing so.

A government whose sole focus seems to be power at any cost and the neglect of the country and those that voted for them in the first place is indeed a sad state of affairs. Regardless of how badly Labour have governed New Zealand over the last 8 years and history will look back and judge this period as one of the blackest since the great depression and more recently Rob Muldoon's tenure in the late 1970s and early 80s, a Governments focus must be on governing the country. It is from the outfall, positive or negative, from a governments running a country that a voters ballot must be judged and cast not the corruption of the democracy by fascist law and filth flinging at opposition.

Either way Helen Clark's Labour Government must be judged and whatever angle one looks at it from , whether it be from Governmental success/failure or unbridled muck raking and various legal/ illegal attempts at remaining in power they have been a dismal failure at both.





c Darren Rickard 2007