Friday, July 18, 2008

Getting fluffy and cute with Teresa Gattung


Come back Teresa, all is forgiven, we love you!

That is what I would be saying if I wasn't being realistic about the disastrous job that Teresa Gattung did at the helm of Telecom New Zealand [TEL] .

Teresa, whose expertise is apparently in marketing, milked Telecom of dividends, failed to invest for the future and cost long term Telecom shareholders billions , as the company share price recently plumbed the depths of sub NZ$3.20 .

After all that she has been resurrected like one of those genetically enhanced sheep from the 2007 film "Black Sheep", the girl just wont die.

Appropriate that I make an early sheep joke because now someone has shepherded her back to New Zealand to become chairwoman of The Wool Company, which is undergoing a complete re-branding under the guidance of PGG Wrightson [PGW] chairman Craig Norgate.

Now you might think this post is about sticking it to Gattung again. Well that is where you would be wrong.

While Ms Gattung was the worst possible person to head a communications company, principally because she doesn't communicate well, as a marketer, she is perfect for resurrecting the tired image and fortunes of the New Zealand wool industry.

Wool isn't sexy, it is still being used mainly in lower margin products like carpet and bulk wool, whereas it could be marketed for use in higher margin goods like quality clothing, specialist outdoor gear and other high end product.

Now I could be wrong, she maybe an awful marketer, however, at Telecom, under her wing, she developed some of the best marketing in business at the time.

The high end wool business could be a high value export business if managed and marketed well and you have to give Gattung a couple of years before you can right her off completely.

Lets hope she doesn't try to pull the wool over her customers eyes, as she did at Telecom.

Related Share Investor reading

Share Investor Forum-Discuss this topic
Telecom NZ Hangs up
Business Gobbledygook puts up barriers to communication
A Rare Breed
Telecom NZ facing a watershed period
Biology a major key in "glass ceiling" for women
Telecom rewards Gattung for mediocrity

c Share Investor 2008

Share Investor Portfolio: 18 July 2008

The Share Investor Portfolio now contains 17 stocks listed on the NZSX. The bulk of the portfolio started back in 2002 and I have added to the bulk of it by using dividends and some cash.


The Share Investor Portfolio as at 18 July 2008

  • Auckland International Airport [AIA] 1000
  • ASB Capital NO. 2 Ltd [ASBPB] 10000
  • Briscoe Group Ltd [BGR] 3000
  • Fletcher Building Ltd [FBU] 1000
  • Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp Ltd [FPH] 5000
  • Freightways Ltd [FRE] 8200
  • Goodman Fielder Ltd [GFF] 2000
  • Halleinstein Glasson Ltd [HLG] 1000
  • Kiwi Income Property Trust [KIP] 1000
  • Mainfreight Ltd [MFT] 3125
  • Michael Hill International Ltd [MHI] 3000
  • Postie Plus Ltd [PPG] 2535
  • Pumpkin Patch Ltd [PPL] 5000
  • Ryman Healthcare Ltd [RYM] 5000
  • Sky City Entertainment [SKC] 35000
  • Steel & Tube Holdings Ltd [STU] 400
  • The Warehouse Group Ltd [WHS] 8000

Related Share Investor Reading: Why did you buy that stock?

Why did you buy that stock? [Fletcher Building Ltd]
Why did you buy that stock? [Freightways Ltd]
Why did you buy that stock? [Kiwi Income Property Trust]
Why did you buy that stock? [Hallenstein Glasson]
Why did you buy that stock? [Briscoe Group]
Why did you buy that stock? [Fisher & Paykel Healthcare]
Why did you buy that stock? [Pumpkin Patch Ltd]
Why did you buy that stock? [Ryman Healthcare]
Why did you buy that stock? [Michael Hill International]
Why did you buy that stock? [Mainfreight Ltd]
Why did you buy that stock? [The Warehouse Group]
Why did you buy that stock? [Goodman Fielder]
Why did you buy that stock? [Auckland Airport]
Why did you buy that stock? [Sky City Entertainment]


Discuss this topic @ Shareinvestor.net.nz

Related Amazon Reading

The Warren Buffett Portfolio: Mastering the Power of the Focus Investment Strategy
The Warren Buffett Portfolio: Mastering the Power of the Focus Investment Strategy by Robert G. Hagstrom
Buy new: $13.57 / Used from: $1.57
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Share Investor 2008

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Kiwis breathe a sigh of frustration, not relief, over distant meagre tax cuts


c Tom Scott, Stuff.co.nz 2008


In a story in yesterday's NZ Herald Mr Cullen said tax cuts in October would bring "relief".

"From October 1 all New Zealanders will get a tax cut that should provide some relief from rising prices." Michael Cullen 16.7.08

Well, I don't get tax cuts from that date because I'm self employed and 10s of thousands of other Kiwis are as well.

It seems bizarre that Dr Cullen would trumpet "tax relief" when Kiwis need it now. They actually needed it years ago. Labour decided to stop taking as much tax off us in the budget this May but the 6 month wait makes Labour's decision political rather than any sort of benevolent government helping out the proletariat. On average the October cuts are equal to less than one block of cheese.

National would have brought their tax cuts in with urgency and unlike Dr Cullen's election bribe, tax cuts were something that the National Party have been pushing for years. Dr Cullen doesn't believe in tax cuts, he thinks the State should spend your money.

“We just don't believe in tax cuts - it's against our fundamental philosophy - after all we are socialists and proud of it.”— Dr Michael Cullen


We can however have a NZ$ 2 billion decision to buy 17th century technology, KiwiRail, made on the fly instantly, lose $1.5 billion of shareholder money by stopping the sale of the Auckland Airport, and increases in road user charges and an extra tax on petrol for all, both increasing cost to the average kiwi and more than wiping out any tax cut come October. But we cant have the meagre tax cut now?

In fact the amount of Government promised election spending so far announced by Labour puts the tax cuts in the shade. We will all be a least $30 pr week behind thanks to Cullen's "generosity" in the wake of an election.

Remember this when you cast your ballot this November:

My view is that tax cuts are largely offered as a political bribe, not because of beneficial economic or social effects.

— Dr Michael Cullen




Related Political Animal reading


Michael Cullen speaks with forked tongue
Cullen's history on tax cuts comes back to haunt him
Wednesday Political Soup: Edition 3 2nd story down - Let them eat cake
Labour and their last crusade



c Political Animal 2008



Not so sweet Fanny Mae

The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac saga is big by world standards.

Trillions of dollars of mortgages are involved, in fact the firms between them own or guarantee about half of the $12 trillion in U.S. mortgages.

I asked a question about 6 years ago, what would happen if these two institutions tipped over? This was in the light of many US companies involved in "accounting irregularities" at the time and that Fannie and Freddie was a possible inclusion.

The immediate cause of the problems that became public at Freddie Mac in 2002 appeared to be accounting properly for the use of derivatives, what Warren Buffett has called "financial weapons of mass destruction". Under the previous accounting procedures, income for the years 2000, 2001 and 2002 was understated, with income for the future overstated. Freddie and Fannie management decided that this method would be used to “smooth out” earnings, providing reassurance to financial markets and leading ultimately to lower interest rate costs.

The President of Freddie Mac was sacked for his part in the company's "accounting problems".

While assets of the 2 big macs went up in value, via customers house prices, there wasn't a problem, but as the sub prime saga unfolded property prices were hit and Fanny and Freddie now have a big cash flow problem. They are essentially insolvent.

I now know the answer to my question and it ain't a pleasant one to stomach, especially given the problem was painfully evident years ago.

These entities will probably go under without US taxpayer funds being pumped into them and the current credit crises that the business and financial world is experiencing will get considerably worse and there would probably be a contagion effect with other banks going under. The derivatives market upon which most of Fannie and Freddie's business is backed, would unwind and explode upon other financial institutions holding theses derivatives as assets, some of them the ones we have already seen in the news and some we haven't heard from yet.

As the planet is facing tough economic times at present, for Fannie May and Freddie Mac to go under would no doubt cause a massive recession the likes of we haven't seen in generations so one could understand why Henry Paulson and the Fed are looking at bailing these turkeys out.

But, and its a big giant butt, why should the US taxpayer have to bail out even more financial institutions, this time possibly to the whopping tune of US$1 trillion?

The answer is that they will take the rest of us down with them if nothing is done. Hard to stomach, given those that didn't binge on cheap debt and over spend, were not the ones who took the risks in the first place but will suffer anyway.

In New Zealand our mainstream lenders haven't been as reckless, however, the present Labour government wants to start our own sub prime lending, so it could be a problem for us in the future.

Kiwis would be affected indirectly though by a collapse of the two macs, so it is an important story for New Zealand and every other country because a collapse would affect our fragile economy and faith in markets, lending and business even more than it already has.

The bizarre thing is though, while we have been flooded with Tony Veitch and Winston Peter's stories, coverage by our local media over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae has been largely relegated to small pieces in the businesses pages and biz segments on TV news, not in the mainstream news, where it clearly deserves to be.

Confidence in the economy is much needed right now, Fannie and Freddie have knocked it about again. What Henry Paulson does in the next few days is going to be the difference between a complete meltdown and the status quo.

Unfortunately, I fear there are more Freddies and Fannies to come.

That just ain't sweet.

Related Share Investor Reading

Global credit squeeze: There is no free lunch
Lenders must come clean over losses to restore faith in credit markets

Global Market meltdown: What is Warren Buffett doing?
Credit crunch a blessing in disguise
Market meltdown: I can smell the fear from here

Mr Market gets his groove on
What happened to risk?
State backed Sub Prime mortgages in New Zealand
The global economy looks bad now, but wait theres more
NZ Sharemarket set for a Winter and Summer of discontent


Share Investor Forum -Discuss this topic

Related Amazon Reading

The Two Trillion Dollar Meltdown: Easy Money, High Rollers, and the Great Credit Crash
The Two Trillion Dollar Meltdown: Easy Money, High Rollers, and the Great Credit Crash by Charles R. Morris
Buy new: $11.86 / Used from: $0.01
Usually ships in 24 hours


c Share Investor 2008