Friday, October 28, 2011

Len Brown's 2012 rate hikes cause for ratepayer revolt

Auckland mayor Len Brown is about to raise rates in Auckland by the level of inflation next year. The only problem is Lenny thinks inflation is going to run at 20% or more:


"Auckland Mayor Len Brown yesterday revealed plans for a single Auckland rating system which is generally kind to rural areas and businesses, but stings many households.

Mr Brown is expecting a "very noisy" response from suburbs such as Mt Eden, Mt Albert, Mt Roskill, Remuera and the eastern suburbs where thousands of households can expect an average 14 per cent to 16 per cent rise in rates next year.

Howick and the North Shore will pay increases of about 10 per cent next July.

Mr Brown is proposing a rates remission to cushion the blow for ratepayers whose increases next year are more than $400 or 20 per cent. But thereafter, those ratepayers will pay the full amount". NZ Herald

Lenny campaigned on keeping rates rises to the level of inflation but broke that promise this year when rates hikes were slightly above inflation and will smash through all fiscal barriers next year when rates will rise by the biggest margin in Auckland's history.

His free spending ways over his first year of incompetence would have added to the 2012 hike and he has done nothing to stick within budget at a time of economic uncertainty not seen since the Great Depression.

I am a North Shore ratepayer and will pay at least 10% more next year. The thing is this makes my hikes in just 1 year come in at just under 15%. I will simply not be able to live here if we have to pay these rises.

I advocate ratepayers refuse to pay their rates next year until Lenny sees the error of his ways, takes his head out of his backside and backs down on these massive hikes.

Come on Auckland, it is time to stand up to this robbery of our pockets, don't moan and fold, refuse to pay and send this little prick the message you want him to hear.

NO!

Lens contact details are:

Facebook

len.brown@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

09 3010101





Thursday, October 27, 2011

Labour's plan to slash pensions lacks conviction

So, Mr Goff is going to slash pensions in 20 years time.


"Labour would also gradually raise the age of eligibility for New Zealand superannuation from 65 to 67. That would be done over 12 years between 2020 and 2033 giving people time to plan". NZ Herald

I agree with his plan to slash pensions but is it really a political winner when it will be the very people who you say you back and will vote for you that will be the ones that lose big-time -albeit in 20 years time when Phil will be collecting the full whack from his heavily taxpayer subsidized pension - no not really.

I don't think he has the courage of his convictions with this policy. Otherwise the lead-in time would have been much sooner. It is more of a I'm different, look at me, look at me, grab for media attention.

He got the attention today but what the heck is he going to do next to surprise us?

Go back to the asset selling that he did in the 1980s?





Labour kick employers in the guts with Kiwisaver.

Interesting that Labour's policy released today that advocates making Kiwsaver compulsory and raises the employer contribution to 7% from 2% and keeps employee contributions the same is about saving.


"The KiwiSaver change "for all workers" would take effect from 2014.

Employee contributions remain at 2 per cent, "because we know families are finding it hard to make ends meet right now, let alone save".

However, employer contributions would increase by 0.5 per cent a year from 3 per cent in 2014 to 7 per cent by 2022.

"Making KiwiSaver universal will make it simpler for Kiwis to save and build a retirement nest egg", "Universal KiwiSaver also reduces our reliance on foreign lending. It builds up our own pool of savings which can be invested in New Zealand businesses and create jobs for Kiwis."

To make the policy more affordable for the Government, Mr Goff said Labour would phase in the $1000 kick start for all new members at $200 a year". NZ Herald

The $1000 every kiwisaver will get via a State handout will be borrowed from China and gather interest. The employee contributes a tiny amount and the employer gets socked the most.

The merits of saving via kiwisaver have yet to be shown. So far it has been a gigantic failure in terms of saving and returns.

The big kick in the guts though is for employers who will struggle to make this contribution and to kick our business in the guts at a time of severe recession is just plain idiotic.

The taxpayer is a net loser from this policy.





Phil Goff: Leader or deviant?

We need to be reminded that Phil Goff really isn't the sort of individual this country should have as its leader. in 2004 Phil advocated lowering the age of consent from 16 down to 12:


"Sex between children as young as 12 will be allowed under a New Zealand law amendment, arousing criticisms from the opposition party and educators, according to Sunday Star-imes Sunday.

The Crimes Amendment (No 2) Bill, which passed its first reading in Parliament in March and is now before the law and order select committee, updates laws regarding sex crimes that were passed in 1961.

The new law would allow a girl as young as 12, and a boy aged 12-14, to have sex with impunity.

The change would give New Zealand the dubious reputation of having the most liberal stance on sex in the developed world. Most western countries set the age of consent at 16, except France where it is 15". See China Daily for more

Any knuckle dragging moron will tell you if you lower standards in the way that Goff wanted to in 2004 then you lower the moral and legal bar and kick the door ajar for those individuals who like kids in a sexual way.

Disgusting and not leadership material.