 Remember this name, Richard Hurley,  Managing Director of Auckland City Brokers and on the  recommended advisor's page on the Good Returns website Richard is described as having:
Remember this name, Richard Hurley,  Managing Director of Auckland City Brokers and on the  recommended advisor's page on the Good Returns website Richard is described as having:
"18  years of experience in the Finance and Investment industry and has  lived in Mt Eden for 25 years. Your satisfaction is guaranteed".
And his company Auckland City Brokers is there to:
"To protect our reputation and your peace of mind, we deal only in quality products.
We aim to implement strategies that will build your wealth and produce income streams in retirement". 
All good inspiring, bodice ripping stuff but lets see how this stacks up.
Richard  advised one of my elderly retired clients to invest a large sum of  money into various ING funds that went belly up last year - he got an  upfront fee for selling it to this person.
He advised on the  basis that the investment was safe and low risk. This is not the case at  all. That fact is that some of these funds were investing in  derivatives in the United States, some of the riskiest investments (more  like a roulette wheel) that one can make.
My client was assured by Richard that the investment was very safe.
Two  days before ING announced a freeze of the funds this individual asked  Richard to redeem the investment because of its dropping value but  Richard laughed at this request and told his client not to worry because  investments changed in value all the time - said said he was speaking  to her like she was a fool.
Richard has refused to take  responsibility for his selling of ING products to this person on the  basis that it was low risk and turned out to be high risk and has left  his former client in the lurch in terms of her getting all her money  back.
We can imagine the rest.
There was much heartbreak,  stress and tears over the following months and in the recounting of the  facts today my client was close to tears a number of times.
Fast  forward to the offer from ANZ/ING to investors in their failed funds of a  60% return of their capital into a cash call account at just over 8%  but with a legal stipulation that those that accept the offer will not  sue ANZ/ING or can you believe it anyone who advised people to invest in  the fund.
You would have to ask yourself why is ANZ/ING  protecting advisers, when they are not part of their corporation. The  answer you might get, like me, is that advisers might know more than the  public does about dodgy dealings in relation to what went on at ING/ANZ  and a legal way of shutting the whole thing down is the best way to  keep a lid on things.
I didn't sign anything so I aint obliged to shut my gob.
My  client accepted the ING/ANZ offer because the individual is getting on  in life and hasn't got the energy to waste precious time and money going  through a long expensive legal process that might not be winnable. Life  is too short and all that stuff.
Financial Advisers (and I use  that term in its loosest sense) like Richard are going to get away with  their misleading advice because people like my confidant are either  afraid, ashamed or legally obligated not to talk about it and that is a  crime, morally and legally.
Richard Hurley from Auckland City  Brokers and his ilk have advised and made money off the elderly under  false pretenses in cases like the one above. They have lost nothing,  others have lost 
everything they have worked their lives for and now live with a high degree of uncertainty in retirement.
Mr Hurley you have fallen well short of being a good financial adviser.
Recent Share Investor ReadingDiscuss this topic @ 
Share Investor ForumRecommended Fishpond Reading
 Buy The     Intelligent Investor & more @ Fishpond.co.nz
Buy The     Intelligent Investor & more @ Fishpond.co.nz
c Share Investor 2009