The recent announcement by the CEO of Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd [SKC.NZX], Evan Davies, that management will be looking over "underperforming assets" leaves more questions to ask than it answers.
Decisions
The timing of management for a reassessment of underperforming assets must be questioned.
Indicators that various units of Sky City's business were not cutting the mustard were obvious years ago.
The Sky City Cinema division is the most glaring example of the inability of management to move on from a dumb decision. Even at the time of purchase of the cinemas, it was obvious that they were never going to perform ,even for a moderate return on capital.
Intense competition from other cinema chains and other forms of media coupled with the high capital expense of continued new technology and the roll-out of more screens, made this purchase one of the worst of its time by any company listed on the NZX.
Management ignored these basic facts and shareholders pleas to cut it loose.
Queenstown Casino
For the life of me I cannot understand the rationale of management in keeping an asset that has never returned wealth to shareholders and has yet to make a profit. It appears to this writer that the status of a casino in the prestigious Queenstown tourist mecca and competition with Skylines outlet there(SKCs partner in the Christchurch Casino) is much more important than making a return on capital. Let Barry Thomas have Queenstown, it will never bring much to the bottom line even if the other casino left town.
Adelaide Casino
The Adelaide Casino has much going for it but it is taking far too long for it to deliver an acceptable return to its owners.
There has been much shareholder money pumped into this gaming den and they have been waiting patiently for the cherries to come up in a set of three. So far only 2 keep appearing.
It doesn't look like management can turn this one around. They have been given ample time and money but still keep shareholders with baited breath that spending millions more on this or that improvement will get more punters in the door and spending. It clearly isn't going to work any time soon.
Why now? Timing.
The most curious question left unanswered is that why, after many long years do Evan Davies and management see fit to look at these and other assets again with a view to remove them perhaps from the Sky City portfolio?
Pressure from shareholders hasn't worked in the past. I'm postulating here that Davies has been pressured by the more astute members of the board to do the honest thing and face up to the reality that some of Sky City's assets just do not belong alongside the good ones : Auckland, Hamilton, Darwin and Christchurch Casinos.
I'm guessing that Davies was given an ultimatum, that he either do something and get rid of the losers or ending up being cut himself.
If Davies only listens to board members and not shareholders do they deserve his leadership at the helm?
The question shareholders must ask themselves is, do we still want Evan Davies as our chief decision maker or do we need to put Sky City in the hands of a CEO who can make decisions, when it is appropriate and timely to do so.
What now? Proceeds of a sell-off
Shareholders have seen the Sky City share price become stagnant over the last 4 years, that is because the market hasn't had confidence in management to do the right thing with the assets and shareholders capital that they have at their disposal.
It is clear that high interest rates and business costs have continued to rise across the entertainment sector and other areas of the economy and Sky City Management have racked up over $NZ 1B of debt with some of the recent acquisitions that they have made on behalf of owners.
The proceeds of a sale of Queenstown Casino, a 40% share of Christchurch Casino(this writer doesn't believe it should be sold)Sky City Cinemas and Adelaide Casino seem to start at around $NZ 600M or there abouts.
75% of the proceeds $450M must go towards paying down debt but the rest $150M must be returned to shareholders via a capital return in the form of a special dividend. Shareholders need some payback for years of average returns.
To leave the proceeds of a asset sale in current managements hands will only encourage another burning hole in the pocket approach to investing and that is the last thing that Sky City needs for a good long term future.
A question still remains.
Who is Evan Davies successor and why isn't he in his chair?
Disc: I own SKC shares in the Share Investor Portfolio
Sky City Convention Centre @ Share Investor
Share Investor discusses Convention Centre proposal with CEO Nigel Morrison
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money Loser: Part Two
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money loser
SKC Convention Centre power-point slide illustrations & SKC submission to Auckland City Council
Sky City Entertainment Group @ Share Investor
Share Investor's Total Returns: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Presentation to Macquarie Group
Morningstar Revalues Sky City Entertainment Group
Guest Post - Michele Hewitson Interview: Nigel Morrison
Failed Sky City bid for Christchurch Casino good news for Shareholders
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Christchurch Casino bid falls short of Investment Criteria
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Never mind the width feel the volume
Sky City Annual Meeting & 2011 - 2012 Profit Forecast
Stock of the Week: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Sky City set to lose National Convention Centre bid
Sky City Entertainment Group: Australian Acquisition on the Cards?
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: 2010 Full Year Profit Analysis
Sky City Entertainment Group 2010 Full Year Profit Preview
Chart of the Week: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Share Investor discusses Convention Centre proposal with CEO Nigel Morrison
Share Investor Q & A: Sky City CEO, Nigel Morrison
Sky City Entertainment: CEO Nigel Morrison discusses 2010 HY
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money Loser: Part Two
Sky City Convention Centre Expansion a Money loser
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd: Download full Company analysis
Sky City 2010 full year profit looking good
Long Term View: Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd
Sky City Entertainment: CEO Nigel Morrison discusses 2010 Half Year
Sky City Entertainment Group 2010 Interim Profit Review
Sky City to focus on Gaming
Sky City debts levels now more manageable
Insider Trading on Sky City shares
Sky City Profit Upgrade: Always on the Cards
Sky City's Current Cinema "Boom" a Horror Story in Disguise
Stock of the Week: Sky City Entertainment Group
Are Insiders selling Sky City Stock?
Sky City Entertainment 2009 Interim Result Preamble
2008 Sky City profit analysis
Sky City share offer confusing and unfair for smaller shareholders
Sky City Entertainment 2008 Full Year profit results , NZX release, 2008 full year presentation, result briefing webcast, financial statements
Sky City 2008 profit preamble
Sky City outlines a clear future plan
As recession bites Sky City bites back
Sky City Assets: Buy, sell and hold
Why did you buy that stock? [Sky City Entertainment]
Sky City Share Volumes set tongues wagging
Sky City half year exceptional on cost cutting
NZX Press release: Sky City profit to HY end Dec 2007
Sky City Cinemas no Blockbuster
Sky City Entertainment share price drop
New Broom set to sweep
Sky City Management: Blind, deaf and numb
Sky City sale could be off
Opposition to takeover
Premium for control
Sky City receives takeover bid
Sky City Casino Full Year Profit to June 30 2007
Setting the record straight
Sky City CEO resigns
Sky City Casino: Under performing
Sky City Casino 2007 HY Profit(analysis)
Sky City Casino 2007 HY Profit
Discuss SKC @ Share Investor Forum
Download SKC Company Reports
Recommended Amazon Reading
The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) by Benjamin Graham
Buy new: $14.95 / Used from: $6.99
Usually ships in 24 hours
c Share Investor 2007
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment on Share Investor Stuff