Showing posts with label Long vs Short: Pumpkin Patch Ltd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Long vs Short: Pumpkin Patch Ltd. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Pumpkin Patch's Chinese Adventure: A Great Wall of Losses or the Road to Riches?



With a 50% higher net profit for the 2010 half year on lower borrowing costs, Pumpkin Patch Ltd [PPL.NZ] is in the news again.

I have often wondered when Pumpkin Patch Ltd would start opening stores in China and news out that they will open their first store there in Beijing has answered my question.

Clearly this is a big risk because China is a massive market with lots of potential competition but with that big risk comes big opportunity in a market that could sustain thousands of stores.

There have been many failures of Western companies entering the Chinese market then high tailing it out with big losses. Lion Nathan Ltd (no longer listed) did this around 15 years ago and lost a bundle. Various US car companies have lost shareholder moola by the Hummer load in China.

There have also been some big successes; Yum! brands [YUM.NASDAQ], Coca Cola [KO.NYSE], McDonalds Corp [MCD.NYSE] have all found riches on the road to China. YUM! ,the franchisor of KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell and a number of other fast food brands is doing especially well, particularly for its KFC offering.

With Pumpkin Patch there is an advantage that many other companies operating there don't have. Their product is made in China so the only logistics costs are rooted in local distribution. Variables like currency fluctuations are also ameliorated and only exists in terms of repatriating revenue back to New Zealand where Pumpkin Patch is currently based.

Pumpkin Patch has strong and loyal brand recognition in all the markets that it currently operates in and is a ripe candidate to exploit the Chinese fascination with all things Western - except for perhaps democracy!

There are some big risks in this market. The sheer size of it means that the cost of expansion is likely to be massive and that is going to be a cost to the company and therefore every Pumpkin Patch shareholder. We have found that the cost of expansion thus far in the USA has cost shareholders dearly, with millions lost due to slow sales and the closing of multiple stores as a result.

Sure, growing a business, especially in a market you don't fully understand or currently don't operate in is fraught with risk but if you want a truely global brand and business, risks like this, done in a calculated, planned and sedate manner must be taken.

Greg Muir, Pumpkin Patch Chairman, was at the centre of a failed expansion as CEO of The Warehouse Group [WHS.NZ]in Australia in 2000 that cost the company hundreds of millions, so I hope that he has acquired the requisite expertise for the Pumpkin's Chinese expansion and doesn't repeat the same mistakes.

If done in an appropriate manner shareholders are going to be wealthy beyond their wildest dreams, if done incorrectly it will threaten the very existence of the company.

Pumpkin Patch @ Share Investor

Pumpkin Patch's North American Downsizing a Prudent move
Digging at Pumpkin's Profit
Long vs Short: Pumpkin Patch Ltd
Pumpkin Patch Buyback shows Confidence in the Future
Pumpkin Patch takes a hit
Pumpkin Patch ripe for the picking
What is Jan Cameron up to?

I'm buying
Why did you buy that Stock? [Pumpkin Patch]
Rod Duke's Pumpkin Patch gets bigger
Buyer of large piece of Pumpkin Patch a mystery
Pumpkin Patch a screaming buy
Broker downgrades of PPL lack long term vision
Pumpkin's expansion comes at a cost
Pumpkin Patch vs Burger Fuel
Pumpkin Patch profits flatten
New Zealand Retailers ring up costs not tills

Discuss this stock @ Share Investor Forum


Related Links

PPL 2010 Half Year Profit


Related Amazon Reading

International Retailing

International Retailing by Brenda Sternquist
Buy new: $64.40 / Used from: $52.00
Usually ships in 24 hours

Buy Investment Books & more @ Fishpond.co.nz

Fishpond


c Share Investor 2010

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Long vs Short: Pumpkin Patch Ltd

http://chart.bigcharts.com/custom/fairfax-com-nz/chart.asp?rnd=0.3338466193181723&style=2242&symb=PPL&size=1&type=64&time=4yr&freq=1dy&comp=&compidx=NZ50G~1392984&ma=&maval=&lf=&lf2=&lf3=&uf=16384&arrowdates=&arrowlegend=&country=NZ&sid=162937


In this fifth installment of the Long vs Short series I am once again going to take look at the chart comparisons for a stock from the Share Investor Portfolio and compare the 4 year return (above chart) (PPL listed June 15 2004, so I cant give you a 10 year period like other stocks in this series) to the turmoil of the last year with a 1 year return chart (large chart at bottom of post).

In this series I want to show the merits of investing, using charts, for the long-term vs short term gains or losses. I will use the longest available data to me for the long-term view (10 years )and will make a comparison against the NZX50.

In the fifth of this segment of Long vs Short I will take a look at Pumpkin Patch Ltd [PPL.NZ]

I currently hold 5000 Pumpkin Patch shares after buying 1000 in August 2006 and have added more since then to take the total to 5000 (see small chart below for detail)

Now this is one of the worst performing shares in the portfolio so I expected a poor result for my shareholding which spans about 2.5 years.

I was right!


My Portfolio

Symbol
Price
Value
Earned
$0.900
$4500
$-8200
You own 5000 [PPL.NZ] shares
purchased at $2.54 [$12700]

If I had held this stock for a full 4.5 years of company listing (see large chart at top) my return would have been 60%-including dividends, tax credits and minus brokerage, the NZX is a gross index of stocks.

By comparison if I had held the stock for just one year (see large chart below) my return would have been a loss of just under 30%.

My total return after 2.5 years or so is a loss of 64% (see small chart on left) That is after dividends and tax credits are added and brokerage applied.

When I initially started this edition of the Long vs Short Series I was expecting to see the long-term return to be negative because the stock has really been hammered. If you were lucky enough to participate in the June 2004 IPO at NZ$1.25 you would still have had a 60% return after collecting the dividends and tax credits, even though the share price ended at 90c today.

Long is still winning after five editions of Long vs Short.


http://chart.bigcharts.com/custom/fairfax-com-nz/chart.asp?rnd=0.3338466193181723&style=2242&symb=PPL&size=1&type=64&time=1yr&freq=1dy&comp=&compidx=NZ50G%7E1392984&ma=&maval=&lf=&lf2=&lf3=&uf=16384&arrowdates=&arrowlegend=&country=NZ&sid=162937



Pumpkin Patch @ Share Investor


Pumpkin Patch Buyback shows Confidence in the Future
Pumpkin Patch takes a hit
Pumpkin Patch ripe for the picking
What is Jan Cameron up to?

I'm buying
Why did you buy that Stock? [Pumpkin Patch]
Rod Duke's Pumpkin Patch gets bigger
Buyer of large piece of Pumpkin Patch a mystery
Pumpkin Patch a screaming buy
Broker downgrades of PPL lack long term vision
Pumpkin's expansion comes at a cost
Pumpkin Patch vs Burger Fuel
Pumpkin Patch profits flatten
New Zealand Retailers ring up costs not tills


Long vs Short series


Fisher & Paykel Healthcare

Mainfreight Ltd
The Warehouse Group
Sky City Entertainment

Related Reading

Pumpkin Patch financial data


Related Amazon Reading

Using Technical Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding and Applying Stock Market Charting Techniques, Revised Edition

Using Technical Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding and Applying Stock Market Charting Techniques, Revised Edition by Clifford Pistolese
Buy new: $26.97 / Used from: $1.99
Usually ships in 24 hours


c Share Investor 2009