Showing posts with label Left wing media bias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Left wing media bias. Show all posts

Friday, May 22, 2009

Carol Hirshfeld's naked grab for taxpayer cash!

When Carol Hirshfeld first came on the scene and when I was a much less informed lefty loser I thought she and jug ears John Campbell were the cats pajamas.

Socialism at 7 or otherwise known as Campbell Live is Left biased in the extreme, inaccurate at best and slanderous at times at its worst.

The damage they do to young impressionable minds must be horrendous.

It is no surprise that she will now work for a racist TV station, Maaoori TV, with a socialist agenda that is supported by the long suffering taxpayer.

She maybe cute and on guys list to do but boy that thin veneer hides a tainted way of thinking.

Related Amazon Reading

A Slobbering Love Affair: The True (And Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance Between Barack Obama and the Mainstream MediaA Slobbering Love Affair: The True (And Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance Between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media by Bernard Goldberg 
Buy new: $17.13 / Used from: $12.95
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Political Animal 2009

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Even with Lipstick and an agenda a pig is still a pig

Judging by the fuss made by Labour and their mates in the left wing media over the last few weeks in regard to Melissa Lee and Christine Rankin, they haven't learnt a thing from the mud flinging and finger pointing that was done before the November General Election, an election that they lost in a landslide to National.

In Melissa Lee's case they labeled her a racist for telling the truth about crime ridden South Auckland and then Duncan Donut from TV3 tried to pin her with taking taxpayer money to pay for electioneering.

With Christine Rankin they hit her with the "unsuitable" label because she doesn't agree with the PC sisterhood over the way our children are raised.

To the brain dead non-thinking individual these accusations ring true but to those who think these accusations lack even the slightest hint of moral fibre they are at best slanderous and at worst racist themselves.

Why is this being done though?

Well, when you label an individual with a PC lefty moniker you are able to get the PC media on board, then try and bully them into submission.

This has the effect of stifling real debate by using that label and then further allows the media to bully and victimise the labeled.

It is anti democratic and was used by Labour before the 2008 election and is typical left wing nastiness. As in 2008 it will backfire on Labour because Kiwis hate unfairness and this is clearly unfair.

What it allowed Labour to do in the above examples was to first avoid the blame for the crime they fostered in hell holes like South Auckland over the last 9 years and for their similarly poor record over child beatings and death and the failure of the United Future sop, the Families Commission to do anything about it, proving that Rankin's appointment was appropriate.

Subterfuge like this is used to avoid responsibility for the Left's part in the very same problems they are pointing the finger of blame at people like Melissa and Christine.

It is morally wrong and it is used to hide the truth and when you cant speak the truth you know you have a problem.

Just today the Labour Party Candidate David Shearer was caught out telling the truth about the very same thing the Left have been frothing swine-like at the mouth over for the last 2 weeks.

When he called South Auckland's unemployed "criminals" there was a certain amount of truth to it. Just as Melissa Lee's comment was.

Nothing wrong with speaking your mind.

Did the media set on it as with Melissa?

You guessed it, No.

They really shouldn't because what is wrong with David speaking his mind? To be consistent with their history on such things though the Left Media really should go after Shearer with the same venom and jealously that they went after Lee and Rankin.

Will they?

No.

Related Amazon Reading

Retreat of Reason: Political Correctness & the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern BritainRetreat of Reason: Political Correctness & the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern Britain by David Conway 
Buy new: $27.50 / Used from: $51.71
Usually ships in 24 hours
Coloring the News: How Political Correctness Has Corrupted American JournalismColoring the News: How Political Correctness Has Corrupted American Journalism by William McGowan 
Buy new: $11.53 / Used from: $2.47
Usually ships in 24 hours

c Political Animal 2009

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Deluded media beat-up denies public the truth

The media attention to Lockwood Smith's comments 2 days ago about immigrants and their abilities or otherwise to do particular jobs or the inability to toilet themselves without coaching were interesting.


It wasn't the comments that were controversial in any way whatsoever because certain races do have particular physical or mental traits that make them good at one thing and crap at another. Lockwood Smith was simply conveying the truth, from information passed on by employers who have experience with immigrant workers.

The controversy really lies at the reaction from the politically correct media, lefty politicians and John Key's over the top reaction to publicly censor Smith for no particular reason other than he might have pissed a few Wellington egg heads off, and to get the snivelling media off his back.

For Smith to have to apologise to professional racist Taniana Turia is really scraping the barrel of filth.

One might also like to point out that the All Blacks have mostly Island and Maori Boys, the Tall Blacks have mostly tall players, most sprinters and the majority of NBA players are black, jockeys are small and light and mostly white and the New Zealand Woman's netball team is, well, fully comprised of women.

All participants in these sports are picked because of their particular abilities and certainly black athletes prevail in sports that require strength, speed, and brute force.

Nothing racist about picking people by ability in this way at all, or to point it out, like Lockwood Smith did, that this is the case.

To vilify an individual in this way by using PC group speak such as "racist" and "bigot" is merely giving way to an intellectually bankrupt idea that those that speak the loudest, with inappropriate labeling and have the opportunity to do so-such as the media and barking mad socialists like Helen Clark-are right simply because someone might be "offended" by the truth.

What this does is stifle free and open speech and quite simply removes us several factors away from truth and therefore democracy.

Interesting that David Cunliffe, who apparently has a propensity to try and eradicate racism from the face of the earth had a go at the Asian accent Benny Hill Style in 2005 when he mocked Pansy Wong's  in Parliament but little was made of it by the mainstream media.

Go figure.




.

Friday, October 17, 2008

The left get their panties in a bunch

So the rabid left don't think John Key is going to be flexible with their Maori seats policy if it means they can negotiate a deal for form a government after the election huh?


Helen Clark has been as flexible as a Russian contortionist on acid when it comes to Winston Peters and his support. She hasn't ruled him in, she hasn't ruled him out but she is telling the public neither one thing or the other but in private she will negotiate a deal with the devil to get back into power after November 8.

So the head girl hasn't been open and honest herself-again!! Isn't there a story there?

Duncan Garner is doing handstands because he is making negative stuff up about Key that any other party running for a seat is doing right now.

For goodness sake even the Maori Party said publicly a few weeks ago that they could do a deal with National but in private they have been saying to their supporters that they wouldn't do a deal with National because they will remove the Maori seats! Isn't that a story?

Where is the story when it comes to John Key?

There simply ain't one.

It looks to the untrained observer that Key has been indecisive-even though he seems to have attained a new found confidence and has handed this latest left spin well-but if you observe closely it really is just left wing media spin.

The meaningless attacks from the left wing media always seem to come when Key has punished Clark's popularity publicly, as he did during the Prime Ministerial debate on Tuesday but this latest drivel will simply be forgotten come election time because it doesn't matter.

c Political Animal 2008