Its partner in crime, the Securities Commission, has as much bite as Jaws with dentures and is as hands off as a doctor treating a patient with swine flu when it comes to any enforcement.
In Bruce Sheppard's column this last Wednesday he manages to articulate my feelings with alot more detail, finesse and institutional fact.
"The listing rules allowed NZX to grant waivers, of the rules. Shit, this meant that NZX could enforce its rules on everyone else but waive them for themselves. Worse as NZX investigated breaches and prosecuted them, judged the results of the prosecution and fined the offenders, this too created a terrible conflict. How would NZX treat itself if it were to breach the rules?" Read the full article here.
The waiving of NZX "rules" has been high in stockmarket news of late as they have been so busy waiving their own rules for various capital raisings that smaller shareholders are wondering whether it will be their company next that will dilute their shareholding in favour of bigger shareholders.
Essential reading for every small shareholder.
Recent Share Investor Reading
- Cadbury could learn a thing or two from 1980's Coc...
- Mainfreight Annual Report Packs a Punch
- Pumpkin Patch's North American Downsizing a Prudent move
- Michael Hill: Interview with Ian Fraser
- A Note to Prospective Restaurant Brand's Shareholders
- Long VS Short : Auckland International Airport
- Pizza Hut sell-off provides opportunities all-round
- Market Watch: Sky City Entertainment/Freightways Ltd
c Share Investor 2009
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment on Share Investor Stuff